Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Stevens-Pope question (Read 5397 times)
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2845
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #15 - Apr 17th, 2021 at 12:43pm
Print Post  
I'd like some help with citations, please.

If you have read someplace that Stevens made more than 600 barrels for the Krag, where did you read that?  When I wrote it, I wrote that it was a WAG.

Where was it reported that the State of Pennsylvania bought 110?  I find it easy to believe, but how do we know that?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MrTipUp
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Quality is to a product
what character is to
a man

Posts: 1314
Location: Indiana
Joined: Feb 19th, 2020
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #16 - Apr 17th, 2021 at 9:17pm
Print Post  
If I could have remembered or tracked down where I had read that more than 600 Steven-Pope .22 Krag barrels were produced. I'd have cited it.  As it is, the best I can do is say that I think it was an internet citation and that the total was somehow derived from remaining National Guard records.  Sorry.

I have one in the 1700 serial range, and the barrel is marked just like all Stevens-Pope barrels when Pope was there.  I have no idea when it was made, since we have to records. Could only guess based on when Stevens and Pope started, and then extrapolate a guesstimate from that.

See the first post in this thread, Vall, for Pope's own claims as to when he worked for Stevens.   Those quotes, by the way, were taken from the internet article "Harry Pope: The Old Master" which is itself an excerpt from The American System to Mass Production, 1800-1932 by David Hounshell.  The article can be found at (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links).

The Tom Rowe quote can be found on our ASSRA Forum; just search for his posts over the whole site.

Bill Lawrence
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16271
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #17 - Apr 17th, 2021 at 10:28pm
Print Post  
MrTipUp wrote on Apr 17th, 2021 at 9:17pm:


See the first post in this thread, Vall, for Pope's own claims as to when he worked for Stevens.   Those quotes, by the way, were taken from the internet article "Harry Pope: The Old Master" which is itself an excerpt from The American System to Mass Production, 1800-1932 by David Hounshell.  The article can be found at (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links).
Bill Lawrence


I have no idea what you're referring to Bill? I simply answered your question about how Stevens-Pope barrels were marked after Pope left. And added that I didn't know when my mid 1700 serial number might be made?
I've read the first post, but already knew when Pope worked for Stevens. That's been well documented in numerous references and also am aware that it appears it was around #1230-1250 range somewhere. Did Pope's quote you mention state when certain serial numbered Pope barrels were made after he left?
I'm puzzled by your response, so if you might clarify what it means I'd appreciate it.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MrTipUp
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Quality is to a product
what character is to
a man

Posts: 1314
Location: Indiana
Joined: Feb 19th, 2020
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #18 - Apr 17th, 2021 at 11:28pm
Print Post  
Could only guess based on when Stevens and Pope started

Whether or not I'm growing senile, Vall, I apparently now do have trouble reading, understanding, and writing English.

Anyway, my previous post was mostly a response to your statement quoted above, which I took to mean that you didn't know when Pope had worked for Stevens.  I'm sorry if I caused confusion or offense.

Bill Lawrence
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16271
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #19 - Apr 18th, 2021 at 9:43am
Print Post  
I think you either misread my comment, or I wrote it in a way it could be misread. I meant I could only guess when my barrel was made based on when Stevens and Pope were in a partnership. So based on that known data, I can only guess when my barrel was made after Pope left. Not that I needed to guess when Pope worked at Stevens.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TRowe
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 178
Joined: Sep 4th, 2017
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #20 - Apr 20th, 2021 at 9:29pm
Print Post  
I have a copy of a letter in which Fred Ross states that the factory turned down to order for full Stevens Pope outfits. It was dated Jan. 1911. Also he was only working part time. I don't believe the Krag barrels had their on serial number range. They did have their own stamp "Stevens Pope" and didn't have the Stevens A&T like you see on most Pope barrels. The highest SP number observed is 1964 and it was a barrel only found in the estate of an old time shooter.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2845
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #21 - Apr 21st, 2021 at 5:17pm
Print Post  
TRowe wrote on Apr 20th, 2021 at 9:29pm:
I have a copy of a letter in which Fred Ross states that the factory turned down to order for full Stevens Pope outfits. It was dated Jan. 1911. Also he was only working part time. I don't believe the Krag barrels had their on serial number range. They did have their own stamp "Stevens Pope" and didn't have the Stevens A&T like you see on most Pope barrels. The highest SP number observed is 1964 and it was a barrel only found in the estate of an old time shooter.


This is quite helpful, but, as usual with anything Stevens, leaves me with another bunch of questions.   

"Fred Ross wrote that the factory "turned down to order" for full Stevens-Pope outfits. 

Does outfits mean barrels? 

Was there a single size (length, diameter, weight) for a "standard" Stevens-Pope barrel?

The photo is of Terry Buffum's Stevens-Pope rifle.  It is a .22 Short, gain twist, with a 44 1/2 action (2-digit SN).  The S-P barrel is about like a Winchester #3 in weight.  The S-P barrel number is higher than the cutoff number for Pope's presence.  I have misplaced the number, but IIRC, it is over 1800.  Was that a "standard" barrel?

Were any of the S-P barrels heavier than the barrel in this photo?   

Were any of the recorded S-P barrels round or half-octagon?


Assuming that the S-P numbers started at 1 and that number 1964 is close to the end of the line, and that the line ran from early in 1901 until the end of 1907, that implies the average production rate was about ONE barrel per day.

That's a few men running a few machines, each doing a different step in barrel manufacture.  If Pope or Fred Ross was supervising such an operation, he would have been on the shop floor, not in an office.  At the very least, they would have been looking over someone's shoulder.   

I have recorded 9 SNs for S-P Krag barrels, with maybe another 3 or 4 that I have references to but not SNs.  How many non-Krag S-P barrels have survived?  I'm trying to infer a survival rate.



  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MrTipUp
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Quality is to a product
what character is to
a man

Posts: 1314
Location: Indiana
Joined: Feb 19th, 2020
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #22 - Apr 21st, 2021 at 6:50pm
Print Post  
In Catalog No. 53 (factory-dated 1911), the term "outfit" was used with reference to the "Stevens-Pope System" for a muzzle-loading rifle.  The outfit was defined as being a barrel, a mould, a false muzzle, a starter, a ramrod, and a lubricating pump.  Illustrations showed the mould to be of the Pope double-cutoff style and the lubricating pump to also be in the Pope style.  The outfit had a fixed price of $40 above what the rifle otherwise cost. 

A breech-seating "Stevens Pope System" barrel could be had at $15 extra, no accessories included.

Accessories could, of course, be bought separately.  A Pope-style duplex powder measure was $6; a Pope-style lubricating pump was $2.50 with one die, $0.75 each for extra dies; the re-de-capper which has long been incorrectly linked to Pope was $1.50; and a Pope-style mould cost $4 for a point cutoff version, $1.50 for a base cutoff version, and $0.50 extra for venting.

No indication that prices charged for some calibers, non-standard barrel lengths and weights, etc. were any different for Stevens Pope System barrels than for "standard" barrels.

Bill Lawrence
« Last Edit: Apr 21st, 2021 at 7:00pm by MrTipUp »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16271
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Stevens-Pope question
Reply #23 - Apr 21st, 2021 at 11:36pm
Print Post  
My Stevens-Pope barrel is half octagon. In .32-40 caliber, and a no false muzzle setup ever fitted to it.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint