MrTipUp wrote on Apr 16
th, 2021 at 2:45pm:
In Catalogue No. 53, was the Krag replacement barrel in .22 rimfire listed?
No. Catalog No. 53 from 1911 does not list these barrels.
HOWEVER, more closely studying that catalog revealed that Catalog No. 53 not only still listed the formerly Pope-associated accessories noted above, but also "breech loading" barrels and "muzzle loading outfits" for the "Stevens-Pope System". The "outfit" included a false muzzle, de-recapper, powder measure, mould, and lubricator pump.
The real question, of course, was whether such barrels were still separately serial-numbered and still stamped "Stevens-Pope". My own guess is "yes" for the former and "no" for the latter; and yet again I dearly wish that the company's records still existed.
Bill Lawrence
Bill, the Krag .22 barrels were definitely stamped "Stevens-Pope".
One of the people at Amoskeag sent me pics of both rifles in their last auction. Barrel # 878, as excellent a sample as any are likely to encounter, was stamped twice, with overlapping strikes, or perhaps the roll stamp slipped. Barrel # 1237, a clunker, was lightly stamped.
I have a photo of Barrel # 1065 with an Ordnance Dep't. flaming bomb stamp right at the end of the Stevens-Pope line. That raises even more questions, considering that the Chief of Ordnance banned their use.
Were they a separate series? I tend to think so, simply because they were bored (or turned) eccentrically and that would have required another series of steps in the manufacturing process. My WAG is that there were more than 600 made.
But the only way we'll ever know is if someone comes up with a duplicate SN.