Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) A case-forming challenge (Read 8069 times)
Patrick Chadwick
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 40
Joined: Oct 5th, 2020
Re: A case-forming challenge
Reply #30 - Oct 29th, 2020 at 4:49pm
Print Post  
Lesson for today: do NOT believe that everything is on the Internet.

A online search with my PC just uncovered the one Stockheim (see earlier post)

A look in my ADAC road atlas revealed 12 places called Stockheim.

I now have to look at them all, to see if I can interpret the OD.
« Last Edit: Oct 29th, 2020 at 4:56pm by Patrick Chadwick »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Patrick Chadwick
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 40
Joined: Oct 5th, 2020
Re: A case-forming challenge
Reply #31 - Oct 29th, 2020 at 4:55pm
Print Post  
Got it!

Stockheim in Odenwald (i.e. Stockheim i. OD). A part of Michelstadt-Erbach, if you wish to look it up.

Alas! No entry in Stoeckel for for a gunsmith in Stockheim, Michelstadt, Erbach, and none at all for the name Friedlein.

Why did I take this trouble? - Because the gun dates from a period when the majority of gunsmiths are listed in Stoeckel, and Friedlein could have been working for one of them, and later become independent.

The complete lack of an entry, by name or by location, makes me wonder if Wilhelm Friedlein was a dealer who put his name on a gun that was actually made, in whole or in part, by someone else.

For that reason , I am going to ask you to remove the front-end  wood and study the hidden section of the barrel most carefully. One sometimes finds markings there.

As to the chambering, it seems that you have the same problem as I have with my Stahl target rifle - the chambering is too generous in the neck for the bullet that would fit in the rifling.

I will get round to this in a day or two, but it is now rather late over here in Mauserland.

Keep watching this space!

Patrick
« Last Edit: Oct 29th, 2020 at 5:06pm by Patrick Chadwick »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Patrick Chadwick
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 40
Joined: Oct 5th, 2020
Re: A case-forming challenge
Reply #32 - Oct 29th, 2020 at 5:10pm
Print Post  
ww wrote on Oct 29th, 2020 at 4:47pm:
After knowing where to look I'd agree on it having Martini Henry rifling. I learned something new. Thank you.
WW


Sorry to be picky, but there is no Martini-Henry rifling. The combination of Henry rifling and a Martini action was the basis of the British Martini Henry service rifle.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ww
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 176
Joined: Apr 18th, 2017
Re: A case-forming challenge
Reply #33 - Oct 29th, 2020 at 6:44pm
Print Post  
Not a problem. Im learning.
WW
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3867
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: A case-forming challenge
Reply #34 - Oct 29th, 2020 at 8:24pm
Print Post  
"the chambering is too generous in the neck for the bullet that would fit in the rifling"
Even if it was a stop ring bullet where the neck fit could be a little sloppy for the bullet?
WW, late in its career the Martini Henrys were converted to .303 with Enfield rifling thus becoming Martini Enfields.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ww
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 176
Joined: Apr 18th, 2017
Re: A case-forming challenge
Reply #35 - Oct 30th, 2020 at 9:39am
Print Post  
Patrick Chadwick wrote on Oct 29th, 2020 at 4:55pm:
Got it!

Stockheim in Odenwald (i.e. Stockheim i. OD). A part of Michelstadt-Erbach, if you wish to look it up.

Alas! No entry in Stoeckel for for a gunsmith in Stockheim, Michelstadt, Erbach, and none at all for the name Friedlein.

Why did I take this trouble? - Because the gun dates from a period when the majority of gunsmiths are listed in Stoeckel, and Friedlein could have been working for one of them, and later become independent.

The complete lack of an entry, by name or by location, makes me wonder if Wilhelm Friedlein was a dealer who put his name on a gun that was actually made, in whole or in part, by someone else.

For that reason , I am going to ask you to remove the front-end  wood and study the hidden section of the barrel most carefully. One sometimes finds markings there.

As to the chambering, it seems that you have the same problem as I have with my Stahl target rifle - the chambering is too generous in the neck for the bullet that would fit in the rifling.

I will get round to this in a day or two, but it is now rather late over here in Mauserland.

Keep watching this space!

Patrick



I looked the location on goggle maps and got the same results. 
There is nothing under the forearm wood but a witness mark one on top of the barrel also. The only other markings on the rifle that I can find is the serial number under the lever that removes the triger assembly. 23830 appears to be hand applied. 
The only thing a serch for the barrel address results turned  up a similar rifle at Julia's in 2014  chambered in 8.15X46R. It sold for $1100. 
I would be inclined to agree with the address being retail or distribution rather than a gunsmith. 
No proofs that I can find unless they are on the tangs under the wood. I haven't tried to remove the butt stock yet. 
I'll keep playing with the star-line 50-90 and Buffalo Arms 44-774r to see if I can get closer to the .015 wall thickness. Buffalo Arms measures  a .515 base diameter and saves the work of sizing down from .558 with the 50-90.
You mentioned Mauserland I assume that your in Germany. I'm in Iowa U.S.
WW
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Patrick Chadwick
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 40
Joined: Oct 5th, 2020
Re: A case-forming challenge
Reply #36 - Nov 11th, 2020 at 10:11am
Print Post  
oneatatime wrote on Oct 28th, 2020 at 2:07pm:
Patrick, now you have to show us the rifle!


Your wish is my command!

But posted in the collecting section!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 
Send TopicPrint