Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle. (Read 7755 times)
burntwater
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 540
Location: Michigan
Joined: Feb 5th, 2018
Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Sep 2nd, 2020 at 12:43pm
Print Post  
I’m  working with a twelve year old CPA 38-55 Douglas 28” 16” twist, 16x Unertl. I cast the chamber and had Accurate make me a mold for a tapered breach seating 300 gr bullet. Bullet is .001” over at base band and .001” over at ogive,  alloy is 1-25 with Emmerts lube. Working with IMR 4227 and Re 7 using Fed Match primers. 4227 shows best promise right now. I don’t have enough stashed 4759 to waste on prelims. 

It’s vertical stringing a problem I’ve worked with years ago on wildcat varmint guns and hunter class BR but those were the result of hot barrels. My 38-55 sure isn’t getting hot so I need some advice on what is going on. Five shot groups start 2” low then start climbing about 2- 2.5 “ for the five shots. Some holes are touching but generally no more distance between shots than 1-1 1/2 diameters. I can see good accuracy potential but the stringing cancels that out. I’d like to think my loads are going in the right direction and the problem is my bench mechanics. I could used the collective experience and some advice.

One thing I’m not liking however is my bench set up it’s an awkward dicey looking assembly but I don’t see any easy way to benchrest a CPA with a Pope style stock and underlever and Swiss style butt plate. I made some longer threaded feet for my Hart rest to get the butt stock drop and butt plate off the deck so it’s easier to get on target. But the butt stock doesn’t play well with any of my rear bags so that needs work - longer ears. Front rest bag is a benchrest holdover that worked with flat forearmed varmint guns but I need a tighter fit for this round barrel. And of course a Swiss style butt plate is just all wrong for bench shooting though I’m sure there a quite a few of you who are forced to work with them if they shoot offhand also with one rifle.   

So what I’m suspecting is that my bench set up could probably be the source of my vertical stringing. I think the gun wants to shoot and I think I’m on the right page to dial it in but this problem has me two-blocked. I shot off the bench for lots of years and when I set up my rest and the gun it was simply a matter of lifting the bolt, reloading, sliding the rifle forward a bit and squeezing the bag a little to settle on target. Not so with this rifle it’s a wiggler and has to be convinced where to set every shot. And I haven’t found a repeatable easy way to make friends with the butt plate either. So my gut says it’s my set up and equipment and unrepeatable shooting technique.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #1 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 1:23pm
Print Post  
Are you sure your Douglas barrels twist is 16 and not fifteen. Reason I ask is mine is 15 and I bought back in 1998. Are you shooting fixed or breech seating and if breech seating what is your load and average velocity. Below is a 38-55 target shot with 17.1 grains of 300MP, Winchester LR Magnum primers and the bullet seated to engrave just beyond the base. Average velocity is 1474 fps. the bullet is a Hoch and per-say the same as a Pope. The alloy is 30-1 and the lube is Dell 59C and the group size is .958. I also posted a picture of my benchrest setup and hopefully that two might be of some help. Rifle is CPA Schuetzen Junior and the front rest sand bag is also custom made. If you think I can be of any help please feel to ask any questions that you might have. 

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Sep 2nd, 2020 at 1:32pm by JLouis »  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
4570mike
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 449
Location: On the Peninsula
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #2 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 1:45pm
Print Post  
My SWAG's would be; check your velocities and see if they are showing much variation.  Also, I found most single shot rifles to be somewhat sensitive to where you rest the barrel.  First; be consistent and second find the "dead node" location.  There was an excellent thread here a bit back on how to do that.
I did the "dead node" search on a couple of my rifles and it tempered vertical stringing for me.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
burntwater
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 540
Location: Michigan
Joined: Feb 5th, 2018
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #3 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 2:50pm
Print Post  
True to form with this outfit lots to ponder and all you guys have brought up should be followed up. 

JL the gun and barrel were serial checked by Gail at CPA and she emailed a spec sheet indicating a 16” twist but I am going to check it real soon. The two barreled set was sold with a 32-40 then later swapped to 38-55 so maybe on to something. I shoot both fixed and breach seated. But the fixed is just offhand practice. 

My new mold drops a 295 gr 1-25 bullet. I cast the chamber when I first got the gun as is my practice. Following advice from Charlie Dell’s and Randy Wright’s excellent books I spec’d a mold with base band .001” over and bore riding ogive at .001” over. I can start the bullet with my thumb into the throat enough to use CPA’s brass seater plug to take it home. Removing a seated bullet shows about 2/3rds base band engraved and landes just touching ogive. 

I need to chrono these 4227 loads again. I did some cursory testing when I got the gun but nothing lately. I am a very disciplined loader  and have been working wildcats and everything I shoot for about fifty years. There are only a couple of powders that I trust my powder throw with and then I still weigh every five. I know my cases are dead on, my charging is dead on and breach seating eliminates the issues of next sizing and crimp. Primers I’m not sure but my stash is limited to Fed Match and CCI Match. I see some use LR Mag so if they work i have some in stock. Primer market not good these days

I need to locate the barrel vibration dead spot as this really makes sense. Right now I’m guessing. 

Tapered barrel is something I’m not aware of but guessing I’d have to slug it to find out. I could use some directions

What about shoulder contact with these Swiss style butt plates. Are you guys shouldering the gun or letting it free recoil ?

Thanks all
Rick
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12114
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #4 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 3:09pm
Print Post  
Just remembered. 

More than a few CPA Stevens rifles have been known to have very sloppy barrel shank thread to receiver fit. That can cause vertical problems.  I know of two. Re-barreled now and they shoot excellent.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JerryH
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


ASSRA Member #10876

Posts: 1303
Location: Easton, CA
Joined: Nov 9th, 2014
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #5 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 3:58pm
Print Post  
My 25-20 WCF, 32-40, and 33-47 all shoot best with the bullet fully engraved in the rifling. The rifle is a CPA with a Pope high comb stock and Schoyen one prong buttplate.

Below is a picture of my bench setup. I stay off the stock with my arm just behind the stock and let the rifle recoil into my arm. The two sandbags keep my arm in position shot to shot.   I also had to raise the front rest. The barrel sled is 1" from the muzzle.

My barrel is loose in the receiver but the set screw keeps it locked in place. No issues with vertical stringing at all.

Hope this may be of some help to you. 

A larger picture is posted below. I'm photo sizing illiterate.

JerryH
  

I'm not a complete idiot, some of my parts are missing.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JerryH
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


ASSRA Member #10876

Posts: 1303
Location: Easton, CA
Joined: Nov 9th, 2014
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #6 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 4:00pm
Print Post  
.
  

I'm not a complete idiot, some of my parts are missing.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #7 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 4:35pm
Print Post  
I don't shoot free recoil and my shoulder just touches the butt and my cheek also does the same on the rifles cheek rest. As you can see I also shoot off of a sand bag that is also filled with 50-50 heavy sand and parakeet gravel. I had David at Protector make me the bag to fit my own personal needs. The barrel channel radius is a 1/2 and the depth is 1 1/4 inches the bag actually wraps itself around the sides of the barrel for increased stability. The barrel channel is 5 inches long so it more than covers the node and each side there of and it also dampens the harmonics / vibrations of the barrel extremely well. The rear bag is packed hard with heavy sand and the ears are not so I can still get just a wee bit of a squeeze when need be. When first starting out with a new chambering I do use a sled up to the point of being able to switch back to the bag for my final tuning. Below is a picture of my load development setup and I also pay real close attention to my recoil balance as you can see by the placement of the sled and also where the barrel sits on my front sand bag. If to muzzle heavy the butt wants to rise off the rear bag under recoil and if just the opposite and to heavy at the butt the muzzle then wants to rise off of the front rest and excessive verticle is my own end result. The sled actually needs to be moved back but it hits the scope and can't. That is why the last of my load development and balance is completed using the front sand bag of which I use in a match and is shown in Reply #1. 

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

« Last Edit: Sep 2nd, 2020 at 4:58pm by JLouis »  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RSW
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1273
Location: Arizona
Joined: Sep 8th, 2006
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #8 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 4:40pm
Print Post  
burntwater
I know what you mean about offhand butt stocks when shooting BR. My No.6 Ballard is great for OH but tricky to handle for good BR shooting.
Four things you might consider:
1. Using your current BR setup, don't use a rear bag at all. Shoulder your rifle, use your left fist under the stock perch belly. See if that helps control your vertical stringing.
2. Use a front barrel rest, one of those clamp on type works well for me. See photo below.
3. Maybe spend a little of your 4759. I have always had good luck with it in my several .38-55s over the years.
4. You are shooting a Stevens, have you made sure your butt stock is tight to the action? Stevens are a bit limp in the wrist. If it's tight, at least you'll know that's not the problem.
Good luck and please keep us posted on what works.
« Last Edit: Sep 2nd, 2020 at 4:48pm by RSW »  

Randy W
ASSRA 10211  -  ISSA 125
There are indeed two Americas. Simply put, it is not the haves and have nots. The two Americans are in reality divided into those who do and those who don't.
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
joeb33050
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2613
Location: Marathon, FL
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #9 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 4:50pm
Print Post  
The variation in pressure on the butt stock causes bullets to string vertically. EX: I get the crosshairs 1 ring up from the center, then adjust rear bag to center the crosshairs. If I get the "1 ring up" thing right, and the rear bag thing right, I get a center. If I vary the 1 ring up, and bag pressure, I can draw a vertical line of bullets.
The "1 ring" isn't important, and with some guns I start BELOW center. Rest/bag sameness is what counts.
joe b.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7688
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #10 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 6:03pm
Print Post  
My early CPA 38/55 # 196 is 18 twist. It handles 300 gr bullets fine. 290 fixed or 300 breech Black & Smokless bullets I cast all it used for 20 years. 

Recently changed to 245 G store bought for high volume offhand. 245 fixed & scopes its A  1 1/2 MOA Rifle. Hand cast breech did about 1/2 MOA better. However have never campaigned the rifle in bench matches. Few bench re-entry’s before going ofhand.

Couple things . True offhand stocks don’t do well on rear bags. Best groups aways muzzle & elbow rest buttplate in My shoulder. This mirrors my Smallbore prone experience. Could shoot better 50 meter groups prone with sling than rest. Rest shooting is a different sport and takes a skill set I don’t have.  1 1/2 moa rifle is plenty good for offhand shooting. Lack of off shots make the score .

However vertical stinging is annoying and should be solved. CPA rifles are sensitive to forearm - action contact. Very good offhand shot Our club had that problem as the barrel heated up. Trimmed the forearm wood allowing a 3/5 card thickness gap cured it.

Guessing your problem is bench technique or the forearm. Also note muzzle and elbow Barrel rides the rest not the wood. Think that’s how most of the old shooters handled their guns. Take the forearm wood out of play.

John Louis on this forum has very good results with an offhand stocked CPA bench rest. Might talk on the phone with him. 

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
burntwater
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 540
Location: Michigan
Joined: Feb 5th, 2018
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #11 - Sep 2nd, 2020 at 10:17pm
Print Post  
Problem with variables is there are just way too many variations. 

Randy I think I’m going to try the left hand support technique. It’s used out here in MI with the egg shooter crowd. They use thick padded gloves. Never used or seen a front rest clamp as shown and not sure of the benefits. Nothing I can do about the CPA lack of a through bolt.   

John lots of good info however I’m currently lacking some of your rest equipment but not out of reach. I need think your over advice and techniques a bit before I respond. 

Understand about contact and pressure on the butt stock however my experience with conventional straight stocks and benchrest rigs is of little use with these stocks. I need to learn how to come to terms with these designs on a bench. 

Boats; not sure as I write this if the forearm Is in contact with the receiver but easy enough to check and correct. 

Finally before I chrono some loads what kind of velocity spread is acceptable with the 38-55 2ith smokeless ? 

Rick
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JackHughs
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 657
Location: Riverbank
Joined: Sep 27th, 2008
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #12 - Sep 3rd, 2020 at 12:05pm
Print Post  
I may have overlooked this a previous post.  If so, I apologize.

A major contributor to vertical stringing is inconsistent ignition.  I've had a number of CPA rifles and I've spent time "tuning" the ignition systems on each of them.

CPA makes mainsprings with varying amounts of "stiffness" and provides an adjustment screw to add stiffness to the mainspring. CPA also makes firing pins with different physical dimensions.  Over time, I've accumulated a small supply of mainsprings and firing pins which I mix and match to achieve optimal ignition. 

You want to be sure the the firing pin has sufficient protrusion and be sure that the firing pin channel is not partially clogged with carbon fouling or brass shavings.  The mainspring should be sized and adjusted to assure that the hammer strike is neither too hard or too soft. 

The long mainspring attached at the rear of the lower tang causes a significant bending moment (torque) at the junction of the receiver and the buttstock.  Set your rifle in your rest and center the crosshairs on the target. Now cock the hammer and observe how much the crosshairs have moved.

In order to minimize vertical stringing, this bending moment has to relax exactly the same amount each time the trigger is pulled.

Accordingly, an over stressed mainspring will contribute to vertical stringing.   And, uniform relaxation of the bending moment also requires that the buttstock be a perfect fit with the receiver and that the attachment screws be snug.  A buttstock with an under or overtigtened through bolt will also contribute to vertical stringing.

I hope this helps.

JackHughs

  

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.  W.B. Yeats
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #13 - Sep 3rd, 2020 at 12:16pm
Print Post  
I totally agree and I have experienced this myself. This is priceless advice for anyone who owns a CPA or an original 441/2.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7688
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Old Accuracy Problem with a New Rifle.
Reply #14 - Sep 3rd, 2020 at 1:58pm
Print Post  
CPA does install through bolts. Not sure it can be put into a Pope style stock.  Before I through bolted would clamp the action in a vise put a indicator on the buttstock and see if it moves when pressed. Through bolts can cure problems but not likely to improve on a properly bedded tang.

Ignition can be a problem, adjustable hammer fall facilitates switch Rimfire to CF. Has to be set so it hits hard enough not too hard. 

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint