Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic 56-50 Spencer smokless load? (Read 1974 times)
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1102
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
56-50 Spencer smokless load?
Aug 30th, 2020 at 7:13pm
Print Post  
I wouldn't think of using a smokless powder load in a Spencer rifle or carbine.   Wondering if anyone has ever tried smokless powder loads for the 56-50 in sturdier rifles.  Case in point is my Peabody 56-60 RF carbine that has been converted to center fire.  Fun rifle to shoot with black powder, but sometimes I feel a little lazy.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ndnchf
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1047
Joined: Mar 6th, 2014
Re: 56-50 Spencer smokless load?
Reply #1 - Aug 30th, 2020 at 8:37pm
Print Post  
I have used Blackhorn 209, a BP sub in my .50-45 navy RB carbine. Not smokeless, but BP sub. This is the same cartridge my M1871 Springfield Spencer uses.

A full case of Reloader 7 in a .44WCF is the pressure and velocity equivalent of the oruginal BP load. Perhaps a 70% load in the Spencer round would be a good starting point.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1102
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: 56-50 Spencer smokless load?
Reply #2 - Aug 31st, 2020 at 9:38am
Print Post  
I think the 56-50 cartridge is a bit shorter than the 50 carbine used in the USN rolling block.  I've not used any Blackthorn 209.  Years ago I tried pyrodex in several other rifles and after that swore off black powder substitutes.   I use either black or smokless.   Thinking I might try some 4759, or perhaps 4227, for starters.   Just trying to figure out a safe charge;  maybe about 55% of something shown for the 50-70.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ndnchf
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1047
Joined: Mar 6th, 2014
Re: 56-50 Spencer smokless load?
Reply #3 - Aug 31st, 2020 at 10:20am
Print Post  
Yes, the .56-50 is a little shorter. My Springfield Spencer will not cycle with .56-50. It needs the .50-45 length to cycle properly.  This photo shows the difference.



You might want to post your question on the CASCITY Spencer forum:

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1102
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: 56-50 Spencer smokless load?
Reply #4 - Aug 31st, 2020 at 11:37am
Print Post  
Is your "Spencer an original or a replica?   I had an original 1860 Spencer that had been reworked into an 1865, presumably be Spencer or Springfield,  and it needs different brass than the Peabody.  The Spencer brass will chamber in the Peabody, but not the other way around.   I can use reworked 50-70 in the Peabody and an original 1873 FN Spencer made in centerfire, but not in the US made Spencer.   The 50-70 rims have to be turned down so that they will go into the magazine.  I've had some problems with feeding, but usually it seems that the overall length is too long.  The FN spencer (one of less than 1000 made originally in centerfire) does use a slightly longer case than the  US Spencer and Peabody, but not as long as the one you show.   Maybe a little less than 0.10" or so.

Playing some number games and coming up with a starting point of about 14 grains of either 4759 or 4227.

I'll have a look at that Spencer site.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ndnchf
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1047
Joined: Mar 6th, 2014
Re: 56-50 Spencer smokless load?
Reply #5 - Aug 31st, 2020 at 2:39pm
Print Post  
Mine is an original M1871 Springfield Spencer 2 band rifle.  Springfield built 1100 of them from M1865 carbine actions.  Mine is VERY particular about cartridge length to function. It likes an O/A length of 1.683" plus/minus a few thousandths.  My cases are 1.355" long.  It shoots very well when my aging eyes can see the sights. Here are two targets fired on the same day at 50 yards.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ndnchf
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1047
Joined: Mar 6th, 2014
Re: 56-50 Spencer smokless load?
Reply #6 - Aug 31st, 2020 at 3:03pm
Print Post  
I'm not saying this is the same for the .56-50 Spencer, but offer it as an analogy.  The late John Kort showed that for .44 WCF, a full case of Reloader 7, about 25gr and IDeal 427098 bullet was equal to the original black powder round pressures and velocity.  

With that in mind, I followed the same philosophy when working up a .44 cal load for my #2 rolling block converted from rimfire to centerfire.  This .44 Remington centerfire case is .965" long and made from .41 magnum brass.I ended up using 16.8gr of RL7 under a 208gr bullet. This was a full case load under the heel bullet. This gave an average velocity of 1000 fps. This was noticeably milder than my stoutest load of 23gr of Old Eynsford 3F that gave an average of 1124fps.  

Based on John Kort's research and experiments, and my own experiments, I'm comfortable using up to a full case load of RL7 in pistol size cases.  I've used quite a lot of it in many small vintage rounds.  I think it is an excellent smokeless choice under the right circumstances.

Your mileage may vary, I only offer this to share my experiences. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint