Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Sifting smokeless powder (Read 5284 times)
bnice
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1964
Location: Iowa
Joined: Nov 30th, 2006
Sifting smokeless powder
Feb 20th, 2020 at 11:09am
Print Post  
Has anyone tried or know anything on sifting smokeless powders? What are the ups and downs?  Ideas on size and of material used. Thinking of how #9 seems to have changed in granular consistency which I think causes weighing and velocity issues.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18080
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #1 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 11:12am
Print Post  
What size screen? Which do you keep, and which do you toss? The powder that goes through the screen, or the powder that stays in the screen?
Seems like you'd end up with two very different powders based on granule size.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #2 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 11:25am
Print Post  
The only powder I "sock" or screen is black powder to eliminate the fines.  Smokeless?  Never
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jeff_Schultz
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1661
Location: Ransomville, NY
Joined: Apr 25th, 2004
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #3 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 11:53am
Print Post  
  Jim Borton and Charlie Dell used to sift powder.  I know there was an article about it; probably in the Journal?  It wasn't in Charlie's book, I just looked.

« Last Edit: Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:22pm by Jeff_Schultz »  

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo

“There is no situation so bad that it cannot be made worse."

  Confidence- The feeling you get before you fully understand the situation.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jeff_Schultz
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1661
Location: Ransomville, NY
Joined: Apr 25th, 2004
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #4 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 2:25pm
Print Post  
    I found it!  Single Shot Rifle Journal Sept.-Oct 2003 page 42 "Sifting Out The Truth of AA-7" by Charlie Dell.
  

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo

“There is no situation so bad that it cannot be made worse."

  Confidence- The feeling you get before you fully understand the situation.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1583
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #5 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:12pm
Print Post  
I screened Bulk Shotgun Smokeless into Coarse, Fine and Extra Fine as Ned Roberts directed.

I wouldn’t think it would do any good with modern dense powders.  They are held to narrow ranges of granule size, and don’t crumble to finer sizes with handling or storage.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BudHyett
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 281
Location: Pacific Northwest, WA State
Joined: Jun 25th, 2011
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #6 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:18pm
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 11:12am:
What size screen? Which do you keep, and which do you toss? The powder that goes through the screen, or the powder that stays in the screen?
Seems like you'd end up with two very different powders based on granule size.


That could be very true. Sifting can give two different burn rates based on the physical characteristics, kernel size, of the powder. 

Powder manufacturer is not an exact science in that the chemical reaction can go to completion with a slightly different composition of elements. The manufacturers test energy content and burning rate to assure the powder fits within their canister grade specification. Any lot number not within specification is sold to the ammunition makers with the test results.

Black powder can be sifted, it is uniform in content, lower in pressure, and the burning characteristics depend on kernel size.
  

Country boy from Illinois living in the magical Pacific Northwest
Back to top
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #7 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:27pm
Print Post  
I have sifted 32 pounds of MP30O with improved results. Ended up with just two sizes of spheres / burning rates and only about 4 table spoons of waste. Shot all of one size first and then the second and both shot extremely well! The screens a total of three and a bottom pan are quite pricy and the only down fall. They are certified and why they are so high. I actually borrowed them from a friend and if memory serves me right they were a 40, 45, and 50 mesh and the bottom pan. If Jeff has Dell's article hopefully he can verify that as they were the same. One of the powders that you really cannot sift and separate is AA4100 the spheres are already all of the same size and close friend has already tried.
« Last Edit: Feb 20th, 2020 at 3:38pm by JLouis »  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ledball
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1021
Location: syracuse, ohio
Joined: Nov 20th, 2009
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #8 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 6:52pm
Print Post  
Charlie Dell was told by Accurate Arms he should stop sifting their powder, that it was dangerous. I helped Charlie with some testing of sifted powder,  I don’t recall any improvement in accuracy, although some increase in FPS, was obtained with the very fines.   Ledball
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #9 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 7:40pm
Print Post  
I very clearly remember Jim Borton spending time at Charlie's developing loads while using his machine rest and sifted powder. By the end of those tests Jim shot 15 groups that averaged 3/8 of an inch. Shortly there after Jim started shooting 250's and came to Calif. with his wife to spend sometime with us. On one of our shooting outings is when Jim bettered CW Roland's record and the first one to do so. If memory serves me right that powder was sifted H108.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #10 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 8:02pm
Print Post  
If anyone here is going to spend the money to buy all of the Sieves and the bottom pan be pre-warned it is allot of work. You can only put a bit more to just cover the top screen. Then you have to shake it like hell to separate it, stop and clean out the powder caught in the screens. And then start all over again so it is a chore and not just a real simple thing. When I sifted my 32 pounds of MP 300 it took me more than 16 hours to shift it all. And once I started I did absolutely nothing else until it was all done with the exception of sleeping for the night and then going back at it again.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ledball
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1021
Location: syracuse, ohio
Joined: Nov 20th, 2009
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #11 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:16pm
Print Post  
IMO  life is to short to waste sifting smokeless powder because it’s dangerous and there is no improvement in accuracy and that’s all I have to say about that.  Ledball
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #12 - Feb 20th, 2020 at 10:01pm
Print Post  
I would have to differ I shot that 32 pounds of sifted MP300 and won allot of honors with never having any ill effects. When you read Charlie's response from Accurate Arms Powder when he was sifting AA 7. They had no choice but to say it was not recommended or safe for liability sake. But if you look at the group he shot in his article in the Journal using sifted he more than cut the unsifted in half.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Green_Frog
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


"It ain't easy being green"
ASSRA Life #281

Posts: 4164
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Joined: Apr 18th, 2004
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #13 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 7:34am
Print Post  
Hey ledball, do you know who ended up with Dad’s sieves?  I know Dale53 sifted a bunch of Carbine Ball powder (approx same as H108) and got some great results with it, then after he gave up Schuetzen, he sold most of what was left to a newer Chinquapin shooter who is still campaigning it effectively.

I’d love to sieve some of my late H108 and see if it made as much difference for me as it did for Jim Borton.  I sure miss those days of being able to experiment down the tunnel out of Charlie’s shop... that separated fact from speculation!

Your Friendly Frog
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ledball
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1021
Location: syracuse, ohio
Joined: Nov 20th, 2009
Re: Sifting smokeless powder
Reply #14 - Feb 21st, 2020 at 10:27am
Print Post  
Frog, I don’t know who got Charlie’s sifting screens, I was never much interested in sifting powder.  The powder company’s must be stupid, if we could cut our groups in half with sifted powder, why don’t the powder company’s sift it for us, I would give a hundred dollars a pound for that powder.  Ledball.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint