Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Alloy Percentages (Read 27384 times)
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #60 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 4:25pm
Print Post  
Chris how much did the length of the bullet decrease after having bumped up.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gunlaker
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 2602
Location: lower mainland, B.C.
Joined: Dec 13th, 2010
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #61 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 5:47pm
Print Post  
John unfortunately I cannot say for sure.  A friend of mine shot it and recovered it.  He gave it to me a few years ago but he is no longer with us sadly.

It is a Lyman Snover I was told.  However, according to some posts on the Shiloh forum it should be 1.370" before firing, but this one is 1.412" after firing so perhaps it is not a Lyman Snover, or maybe it's some other mold makers version.   

EDIT: I just did a search and this recovered bullet has one more driving band than a Lyman Snover Smiley

Chris.
    
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gunlaker
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 2602
Location: lower mainland, B.C.
Joined: Dec 13th, 2010
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #62 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 5:56pm
Print Post  
Ok, more info.  I have my friends very detailed notebook.  That particular bullet is actually a Dr. Richard Gunn design.  It started as 1.442" long so shortened 0.030".   The nose bumped up from 0.399" to 0.405" after firing which is just a little under groove diameter ( 0.4095"-0.4097" ).

Oh, and it was recovered from a snow bank.

Chris.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #63 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 6:01pm
Print Post  
Thank you for the update Chris I have always been curious just how much the nose moves back when the bullet shrinks in its length to fully fill the grooves. Maybe someone here might know as I would like to know the difference between a cylindrical and a tapered bullet that would loose even more of it's length.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CW
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 531
Joined: Feb 20th, 2018
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #64 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 6:20pm
Print Post  
It really does not look at all like a Snover (designed by Dr. Gunn) However I think that is the point, the carefully designed and cast aerodynamic bullet that went into the chamber, exits looking like something different. 

For BPCR, I like hard alloys.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #65 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 6:28pm
Print Post  
CW they are never the same coming out as they were when they went in according to Mann's extensive work.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CW
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 531
Joined: Feb 20th, 2018
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #66 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 7:23pm
Print Post  
Right! 
And, we try to minimize the differences, and to large extent, with strong alloy choice, tight match chambers, and bullet fit by design, we do.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4465
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #67 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 7:34pm
Print Post  
And now we are back to nose slump which can happen with a long unsupported nose of an alloy that is too soft to resist the impulse if not in perfect axial alignment.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #68 - Feb 26th, 2019 at 8:55pm
Print Post  
Yep it all goes hand in hand when all is said and done and why Mann could never eliminate his X Factor it being an unbalanced bullet.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
art_ruggiero
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1221
Location: CT
Joined: Dec 14th, 2008
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #69 - Feb 27th, 2019 at 10:39am
Print Post  
sounds like the PJ or brooks creedmoor bullet might be the best choice    art
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TheGimp
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 49
Location: NE TN
Joined: Jan 28th, 2019
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #70 - Feb 27th, 2019 at 9:28pm
Print Post  
gunlaker wrote on Feb 26th, 2019 at 3:45pm:
John here is a picture of that recovered bullet shot with black powder.   The alloy is 20:1 and it was shot in a .40-65.

Although the nose bumped up well into the rifling, from what I understand this load did not produce any leading.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Chris.

I'm re-reading Mann at night before bed.

I once read an analysis that proved that the lead bullet couldn't slump under acceleration down a bore. I wish I could find it.

Faulty math.

That picture is what I have been looking for. Snow or whatever recovery media could (and I stress could) cause deformation of a bullet that looks like slump. 

However, the bore riding portion of the bullet expanding into the groves is irrefutable evidence that the bullet slumped in the bore. 

A proper measurement in my opinion would be the depth of the groves in the bullet, representing the amount it expanded into the groves of the rifling. This along with bore dimensions and bullet nose diameter would complete the measurements.

Steven
  

Steven

Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they Aren't out to get me!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #71 - Feb 27th, 2019 at 10:21pm
Print Post  
When going back through the Mann book also look at the Bullet in what he refers to it being in the putty state. Not sure if it might be helpful but it might be worth going back too and taking another look at?
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CW
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 531
Joined: Feb 20th, 2018
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #72 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 11:02am
Print Post  
My goal is to keep them from slumping.
My solution is to use an alloy hard and strong enough to support the "un-supported" nose Grin 

It works.
One tool to get an idea if your alloy works is two chronograph Bc testing as well as traditional accuracy testing both close and at range from the long lines.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #73 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 11:55am
Print Post  
One can only do their best to keep it the same shape coming out as it was going in. A richer tin to lead alloy does indeed help quite a bit. But there may also be a point when go richer with tin that the rifle just might not like it. Mine likes 1-16 but it doesn't take a liking to 1-10 all though I wish it would.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Alloy Percentages
Reply #74 - Feb 28th, 2019 at 12:05pm
Print Post  
I have also heard of bullets slipping / stripping the grooves but not sure of the cause other than possibly not having the alloy tin rich enough? Also not sure how one could go about identifying it a caught bullet would still show the markings left by the lands once they took hold.
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 
Send TopicPrint