Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Front stuffers and substitute propellant (Read 7524 times)
Cbashooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1631
Location: Eastern Wa.
Joined: Mar 31st, 2018
Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Sep 10th, 2018 at 12:15am
Print Post  
Why do so.many foo foo and badmouth substitute black  powder while their guns are far from bulit in traditional fashion with traditional materials ? The "purist" attitude drives me nuts!! I've been accused of ruining the sport for shooting subs.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #1 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 9:09am
Print Post  
Maybe because they have never found a substitute powder that was as accurate as as black

40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rgchristensen
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1188
Joined: Jan 2nd, 2014
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #2 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 9:45am
Print Post  
    Generally speaking the substitutes for BP are neither new concepts, nor superior to BP.   The attraction for the sellers is that there are fewer restrictions on shipping/storing them.   If it makes you happy, go ahead and use them, but don't fool yourself that you are getting something that is somehow "better" than the real thing.

CHRIS
RGChristensen
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1151
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #3 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 9:49am
Print Post  
I don't think the fake black powders work in flintlocks so have never bothered with them.  I do know from my brief experience with Pyrodex in a 40-70 BN that it is actually more corrosive than black powder.  Harder to clean too.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18049
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #4 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 10:38am
Print Post  
I have not used much of real BP or substitutes. But the substitutes I have used weren't very accurate compared to the BP I tried.
Another thing I found about using substitutes in a Ruger stainless percussion revolver is they'll corrode the gun as bad or worse then BP. My younger brother used Pyrodex in his stainless Ruger percussion, just because he thought it would be even better in it than BP. Thinking it was safer, cleaner, and a stainless gun, he didn't clean it immediately as one would with BP. A few days later he tried to take it apart to clean and found it froze up big time! Took a lot of soaking, and some force to get it apart to finally clean. Some of the corrosion never did clean off the SS parts.
No substitute powders for us.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
4570mike
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 460
Location: On the Peninsula
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #5 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 8:16pm
Print Post  
You guys need to step into the 21st century.  Try some Blackhorn 209 in your muzzle stuffers.  Sorry it doesn’t work with flint locks.  I shoot this in my Hawkin and Forntier percussion.  Never give up anything to the BP shooters and usually top them.  And this is with patched RB’s.  Can’t understand the resistance to using this stuff.  I use it in all my BPCR guns, too. Yes, it’s expensive, but much kinder to my nice rifles. Nothing against BP shooters, but been there done that.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #6 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 8:33pm
Print Post  
For those traditionalists, including myself, who only ever use BP in original BP cartridges such as the 40/60, 40/65, 45/70 etc, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible, same thing applies to V8 engines.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #7 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 8:40pm
Print Post  
When these threads pop up, as they do often, nothing changes. Pyrodex is taken as the arch-typical BP sub and roundly put down cause it rusted guns used by lazy "I won't have to clean my gun" shooters. I too used Pyrodex for years, in .54 TC muzzle loader, 44-40 and 45 Colt Rugers, Husqvarna hammer doubles made from 1920s to 1940. Because I grew up with BP cartridge rifle, I did the usual complete cleaning. NO PROBLEMS. Lots better than the nasty Dupont and later Goex BPs!!

Then 777ffg came out and it was much better than Pyrodex and the shoddy "real" BPS in all ways. Over following 15+ years I alternated 777FFG and Swiss FFg (the only real BP I will even consider using). Down range and otherwise the results were much the same.

Not been active since the Blackhorn 209 appeared. Hear lots of good things about it from those that use it and something like total silence from the Real BP Addicts.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #8 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 8:47pm
Print Post  
Mick B wrote on Sep 10th, 2018 at 8:33pm:
For those traditionalists, including myself, who only ever use BP in original BP cartridges such as the 40/60, 40/65, 45/70 etc, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible, same thing applies to V8 engines.
Mike.


Some of us are not at all traditionalists but still happily use/used Swiss in 40-65 is BPCR and much more extensively in 44-40s. Excellent powder and as pleasing to use as any "modern" traditional nitro rifle powder in the ease of getting excellent down range results.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Zack T
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 354
Joined: Apr 9th, 2010
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #9 - Sep 10th, 2018 at 11:10pm
Print Post  
I never got into the substitutes as I always figured smokeless was the most efficient substitute for black so why mess around if I wasnt going to just do black. To each their own. Some are probably as good or better than black in certain applications. For me, shooting thousands of rounds in competitions that dont allow substitutes vs a few rounds hunting where I can shoot what I want- the subs just never made sense. Your mileage may vary.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #10 - Sep 11th, 2018 at 1:21am
Print Post  
I've been using 777 in my frontloader for deer hunting since it came out. No issuses and easier clean up in my opinion. Never waited days to clean it but have cleaned the day after with no problems. Accuracy is as good as I am capable of shooting.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #11 - Sep 11th, 2018 at 4:10am
Print Post  
George Babits wrote on Sep 10th, 2018 at 9:49am:
I don't think the fake black powders work in flintlocks so have never bothered with them.  I do know from my brief experience with Pyrodex in a 40-70 BN that it is actually more corrosive than black powder.  Harder to clean too.

George

I have never heard of one the would work in a flintlock.   

No reason to use fake smoke with smokeless powder for BPCR  Roll Eyes
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KFW
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 634
Location: Wyoming
Joined: Dec 18th, 2016
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #12 - Sep 11th, 2018 at 8:27am
Print Post  
if one checks out the "match results" of any creditable shoot, you will find few (if any) in the top positions are using a substitute. now the accuracy expectation of a 50 yard+ deer rifle would be different and a sub would work. 
kw
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #13 - Sep 11th, 2018 at 9:39am
Print Post  
KFW wrote on Sep 11th, 2018 at 8:27am:
if one checks out the "match results" of any creditable shoot, you will find few (if any) in the top positions are using a substitute. now the accuracy expectation of a 50 yard+ deer rifle would be different and a sub would work. 
kw


"creditable shoot" would seem to cover a lot of territory. You probably already know that the "major" BP matches only allow traditional BP or Pyrodex, an old BP sub whose performance has been markedly exceeded by 777 and reportedly by Blackhorn 209 (which I have never tried). 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KFW
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 634
Location: Wyoming
Joined: Dec 18th, 2016
Re: Front stuffers and substitute propellant
Reply #14 - Sep 11th, 2018 at 2:20pm
Print Post  
I would consider the Quigley match a creditable shoot, a review of the top shooters powder choice would confirm my view. Also the match results as posted in Black Powder Cartridge news will confirm very few serious shooters are using a sub.
kw
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Send TopicPrint