critter68 wrote on Aug 16
th, 2018 at 5:41pm:
pure curious: what is the science or explanation that a wad at the powder poses the possible ringing barrel issue where as a wad at the case mouth does not?
If the powder is confined in a uniform configuration, then upon combustion, a uniform gas front travels up the barrel. When it strikes the bullet, it is decelerated, whereupon it acquires an exponential pressure gradient. (Well known phenomenon, the Earth's atmosphere being an example). The resulting region of high pressure at the base of the bullet over-stresses the bbl at this point. It has been demonstrated that one can ring a barrel by firing an unconfined charge (i.e., no wad) straight up. Generally, if the wad is seated some distance ahead of the powder charge, no problem occurs.
It is the reflection of this high-pressure region back down into the case that causes "buckled" case necks sometimes. The case, already having relaxed somewhat, allows some of the high-pressure gas to leak down the outside of the neck. When the pressure drops further, the trapped high-pressure gas forces the neck inwards.
This phenomenon was first described by Vieille (sp?) in 1870's, and Bill Helbert and Charlie Dell published a description of their work on the subject some years ago in the ASSRA Journal. Gerald Burrard in "The Modern Shotgun" applies it to the ringing of shotgun bbls by obstructions.
CHRIS
RGChristensen