ASSRA Forum - Remington Rolling Block 40-50 straight vs 40-50 BN

ASSRA Forum › General › Reloading the Single Shot Rifle › Remington Rolling Block 40-50 straight vs 40-50 BN

(Moderator Group: Moderator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Remington Rolling Block 40-50 straight vs 40-50 BN (Read 1782 times)

Uechi Full Member Offline Posts: 165 Location: Florida Joined: Mar 2^nd, 2012	Remington Rolling Block 40-50 straight vs 40-50 BN Jun 15^th, 2018 at 12:32pm	Print Post
	Short of slugging the bore is there anyway to tell if a No.1 Sporter is 40-50 straight or 40-50 bottle neck?


	IP Logged

rkba2nd Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 2102 Location: earth Joined: Feb 16^th, 2009	Re: Remington Rolling Block 40-50 straight vs 40-50 BN Reply #1 - Jun 15^th, 2018 at 2:03pm	Print Post
	You should be able to tell by looking down the bore. you might have to fiddle with the light source.

	rkba2nd
	IP Logged

John Boy Ex Member	Re: Remington Rolling Block 40-50 straight vs 40-50 BN Reply #2 - Jun 15^th, 2018 at 3:53pm	Print Post
	Here's a diagram of the 40-50 Sharps Straight. Do a chamber cast and if it doesn't match - you have a 40-50 bottleneck (You need to *Login* or *Register* to view media files and links)


	IP Logged

Deadeye Bly Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 1145 Location: Stephens City Joined: Feb 25^th, 2011	Re: Remington Rolling Block 40-50 straight vs 40-50 BN Reply #3 - Jun 15^th, 2018 at 4:20pm	Print Post
	the 40-50 straight has a base diameter of about .460" and the 40-50 Bottleneck has a base diameter of about .500"


	IP Logged

marlinguy Frequent Elocutionist Online Ballards may be weaker, but they sure are neater! Posts: 18048 Location: Oregon Joined: Feb 2^nd, 2009	Re: Remington Rolling Block 40-50 straight vs 40-50 BN Reply #4 - Jun 15^th, 2018 at 5:37pm	Print Post
	Look in the chamber. The Straight is a straight wall chamber and the Bottleneck is a bottleneck in the chamber.

	(You need to *Login* or *Register* to view media files and links)
	IP Logged

Pages: 1

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Page completed in 1.4063 seconds.