Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ? (Read 8330 times)
brstevens
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 42
Location: Arnold
Joined: Sep 27th, 2013
H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Mar 20th, 2018 at 9:51pm
Print Post  
Is anyone using H4895 in Rem RB in 7mm ?  Have bullets from 120 to 175 gr , just looking for a nice safe low pressure load.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2138
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #1 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 12:03am
Print Post  
I'd suggest loads that keep the pressures below 35,000 psi.  Go to the Hodgon site, and they have loading data WITH pressure data.  Looks like 4350 and Varget will be the best for keeping pressures down (on the 170 gr bullets I looke at).  

Here's the link:  (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Mar 21st, 2018 at 10:07am by ssdave »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
craigster
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 823
Location: lost coast CA
Joined: Feb 20th, 2011
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #2 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 12:28am
Print Post  
Hodgdon also has data for reduced loads using H4895.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ww
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 176
Joined: Apr 18th, 2017
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #3 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 8:37am
Print Post  
I'm wondering if the 7M.M.SM and 7.mm that are stamped on the 97/02 Remington rolling block was loaded to the same pressure as modern 7x57 at 57,000 psi.
I have each and was wondering what pressures the #5 rolling block was designed to handle.
WW
« Last Edit: Mar 21st, 2018 at 8:43am by ww »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
art_ruggiero
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1222
Location: CT
Joined: Dec 14th, 2008
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #4 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 9:16am
Print Post  
not modern pressures for sure and the chamber is a little different than modern   art
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3002
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #5 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 1:32pm
Print Post  
I have been messing about with a 7x57 #5 Roller for a couple of years, more off than on.  Military sights & trigger really preclude any serious load development.  I have lots of jacketed bullets.  Bore is .284 at breech & muzzle but larger in between.  Cast bullets are a waste of time.   

What I want is a good set of .30-30 level loads, 35,000 psi or less.  I tried loads edging up from 30.0 to 35.0 grains IMR-3031 with 136-grain military bullets.  No great results.  I went to the Hodgdon site.  H says the upper end load is over 39K, too much for the ye olde roller.  The H4895 reduced load looks like the next step.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4473
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #6 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 7:34pm
Print Post  
WW, the period German proof load for the 98 Mauser in 7x57 was 57,000 but the standard service load was 43,000. I believe the Model 5 was also offered in 30-40 Krag for which the service pressure was 40,000. Of course it is not just pressure but what can happen if a case fails. The 98 Mauser had several channels to divert the pressure and a shield on the back of the bolt to keep the bits out of the shooters face, The Model 5 has none. When I get a chance to look it up I'll post what my 1902 liked.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1151
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #7 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 8:39pm
Print Post  
The original bullet was a 175 grain round nose in the 7mm Spanish Mauser.  I have been shooting 7mm rolling blocks for 50 years and have always used the heavy 175 grain bullets.  They work very well.  Also, the 168 grain cast bullet will work very well.  For many years I used 39 grains of 4320 with the jacketed bullets.  Four or 5 years ago I switched to 4350 because that gives a little bit lower pressure than 4320.  The other trick is to make your brass by necking down 30-06 military brass.  That brass is a good bit heavier than the commercial 7mm brass and lasts longer.  I use 4198 with the case bullets.  Have to look up the load but it is around 1800 fps.

If you look in most of todays reloading manuals they will tell you to consider the minimum listed loads as the top loads for the '93 Mauser and the Remington rolling block.

You can also get a much lighter trigger spring which will really help.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
brstevens
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 42
Location: Arnold
Joined: Sep 27th, 2013
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #8 - Mar 21st, 2018 at 9:13pm
Print Post  
Was thinking that 30 to 32 gr H4895  should be safe ?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4473
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #9 - Mar 22nd, 2018 at 12:10am
Print Post  
OK, I found my old notes. My 1902 carbine was well worn to the point that the rifling looked pretty smooth (there were no pits maybe just cleaned the heck out of it). The first criteria to meet is that the brass has been fire formed to the chamber by putting one wrap of a 1/8 inch wide strip of electrical tape around the head just in front of the extractor groove. This will require a little pressure to push the case in just far enough to close the block and will ensure 2 things - one that the case is centered in the generous chamber so that when it is fired it expands evenly all the way around and two that the shoulder can blow out to the length of the original 7x57 chamber to set the headspace. After the fire forming the tape can be removed and the case only neck sized from then on. The best load I had was the 160 grain Norma boattail with 47 grains of 4831 giving a 100 yard group of just over 1 1/4 inch. When I came back to play with it some more I used the 169 grain RCBS cast bullet and 24 grains of IMR4895 worked well as did 15 to 16  grains of 2400, and 20 grains of IMR 4198. One time 16 grains of IMR 4198 even got a 6 shot group at 200 yards into 4.5 inches with the barrel sights on the carbine. With a 150 grain Lyman 19 grains of 2015 worked well at 100 as did 14 grains of 2400 as well as 4227. YMMV
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bulseyetom
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1025
Location: Santa Maria, Ca
Joined: Oct 31st, 2010
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #10 - Mar 22nd, 2018 at 12:29pm
Print Post  
Quickload with 160 grain Sierra bullets shows IMR 3031 to burn 100% with a load of 33.5 gr @ 35000 psi.  H4895 was very similar with 98% burned with 34.9 grains.  I am not sure how to compare apples to oranges as the 39,000 psi usually stated for maximum pressure for a roller as loaded in 1900 was probably in cup units.  Quickload shows loads for 7x57 and 7x57 SAAMI so I used 7x57 which uses cip units.  Let me know what bullets you want data for and I will run it through for you.  I load for a Model 93 Mauser so I load somewhat hotter as that rifle will shoot factory ammo unlike the rolling block.  When I was a kid we had a 7x57 roller in the family and my uncle shot one of the factory loads he used in the Model 93 and had to hammer the action open!  He shot lots of cast bullets in the roller and I remember he ruined all of the brass as they were too large to fit the chamber of the Model 93 after firing.  We just had a 310 tool (I still have it) so full length sizing was not possible.  I think the practice of sizing shortened 30-06 brass until the action just closes is the best way to get brass for your rifle.  Tom
  
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
brstevens
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 42
Location: Arnold
Joined: Sep 27th, 2013
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #11 - Mar 23rd, 2018 at 5:15pm
Print Post  
Different brands of 120 gr mostly speer and some 168 gr Bt not sure what brand they are.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3973
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #12 - Mar 23rd, 2018 at 5:50pm
Print Post  
Brstevens, just to be sure, take one of those 168gr. boat tail bullets and put it up to a magnet. Lots of old surplus military ammo used that weight and steel cores. Nothing wrong with the slugs, mind you, but I wouldn't use them in a hunting load.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #13 - Mar 23rd, 2018 at 6:15pm
Print Post  
calledflyer wrote on Mar 23rd, 2018 at 5:50pm:
Brstevens, just to be sure, take one of those 168gr. boat tail bullets and put it up to a magnet. Lots of old surplus military ammo used that weight and steel cores. Nothing wrong with the slugs, mind you, but I wouldn't use them in a hunting load.


All commercial shooting ranges I use DO NOT ALLOW rifle ammo with steel cores or mantles and will use strong magnet to check all rifle ammo for steel cores and mantles.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3973
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: H4895 in Remington Rolling Block 7mm ?
Reply #14 - Mar 23rd, 2018 at 9:19pm
Print Post  
Actually, I made a goof in the steel-core bullet ID in my post above. The 168gr. ones that I have (most of a case still loaded in stripper clips) is surplus 8mm, not for the thread's subject 7mm. If any exist in that weight from military or other sources with steel core, I'm unaware. Sorry if this confused anybody.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint