Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) .22 Hornet quiz. (Read 10779 times)
tdmidget
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 52
Joined: Jan 21st, 2016
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #30 - Jun 10th, 2018 at 7:56pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Mar 17th, 2018 at 3:52pm:
Quote:
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)


Though citing Whelen as developer is incorrect, it's pretty surprising that whoever prepared this (possibly a European) had heard of Harwood's Hornet, which isn't even listed in Barnes.  Too bad Wiki doesn't provide an easy way to make corrections, or notify someone who could so.

Change made.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #31 - Jun 10th, 2018 at 8:37pm
Print Post  
beltfed wrote on Jun 10th, 2018 at 7:31pm:
22-20?

No, 22 Hornt is a 25-20 necked to 22, so if you blow a Hornet out to 25, it is obviously back to 25-20, you have not invented a 25 Hornet.  It is back where it started, 25-20  Roll Eyes
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sureshot
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 296
Location: Snohomish
Joined: May 27th, 2007
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #32 - Jun 10th, 2018 at 9:15pm
Print Post  
25-20 necked down to .22 is a 218 Bee.

Steve   Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #33 - Jun 10th, 2018 at 11:24pm
Print Post  
I thought they are both based on it.  Undecided
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
beltfed
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1749
Location: Central Wi
Joined: Dec 20th, 2007
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #34 - Jun 10th, 2018 at 11:39pm
Print Post  
                      base dia      case length
22 hornet           .294           1.40
22 WCF              .295           1.39

25-20 WCF         ..349           1.33
218 Bee              .349            1.35

25-20 SS             .315            1.63
All per Cartridges of the World
SO, the Hornet was begat by the 22WCF,
Not the 25-20WCF or the 25-20SS
beltfed/arnie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #35 - Jun 10th, 2018 at 11:42pm
Print Post  
OK, thanks
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bill Lawrence
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1037
Joined: Mar 17th, 2014
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #36 - Jun 11th, 2018 at 6:32am
Print Post  
To either add to or further clear up the confusion, it was the .22 Lovell (i.e., the .22-3000) that was based on the .25-20 SS.

Bill Lawrence
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #37 - Jun 11th, 2018 at 3:17pm
Print Post  
I must be getting Oldtimers. I messed or mixed up the Harwood failure with the modern Hornet  Embarrassed
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3541
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #38 - Jun 11th, 2018 at 3:34pm
Print Post  
Harwood's cartridge wasn't a failure- just that all the brass dried up when you guys started making 22-3000 out of it. Roll Eyes
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #39 - Jun 11th, 2018 at 10:14pm
Print Post  
calledflyer wrote on Jun 11th, 2018 at 3:34pm:
Harwood's cartridge wasn't a failure- just that all the brass dried up when you guys started making 22-3000 out of it. Roll Eyes


Not to mention the inconvenience caused when the inventor & chief proponent died!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #40 - Jun 16th, 2018 at 5:36pm
Print Post  
Redsetter wrote on Mar 12th, 2018 at 5:57pm:
Deadeye Bly wrote on Mar 12th, 2018 at 4:40pm:
I wanted to read  about Reuben Harwood's baby, the Harwood Hornet from 1894.


It passed into history when he died.  It's major problem was BP, always troublesome in small-bores, but on the other hand, Winchester sold a LOT of '85s in .22 WCF. (Try to find one with a really good bore!)  Maybe competition from .22 WCF, for the limited number of shooters interested in a .22CF, helped do it in.

I haven't found out for sure whether the cases Harwood used were .25-20 SS or repeater.  Harvey Donaldson talked about it in one of his articles for Rifle, but didn't specify which case he meant.



Harwood's .22 Hornet was a necked-down .25-20 Stevens case, not the Winchester.  There is a photo of one in the Donaldson book "Yours Truly".   Curiously it has a sharp shoulder that looks very close to the much later Lovell R2, but with a much longer neck.  So close, in fact, that when it came to repairing a horribly botched bush-and-rechamber job that Parkenfarker did to mine, I used my R2 Lovell reamer to form the body portion of the chamber.

I suspect that the difficulty in cleaning black-powder residue from that tiny and sharply-shouldered case may have had a lot to do with its' lack of popularity.  It's been a real bear for me. 
« Last Edit: Jun 16th, 2018 at 5:45pm by uscra112 »  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: .22 Hornet quiz.
Reply #41 - Jun 16th, 2018 at 5:50pm
Print Post  
uscra112 wrote on Jun 16th, 2018 at 5:36pm:


I suspect that the difficulty in cleaning black-powder residue from that tiny and sharply-shouldered case may have had a lot to do with its' lack of popularity. 


No doubt; but the .22WCF suffered from the same difficulties, yet Winchester managed to sell quite a few of them.  It's the difference between marketing by a huge company vs. a lone individual taking out small ads in shooting pubs; although Harwood took out a full-page ad in Ideal HB #5 (maybe other eds. too). Part of that ad consists of a full size drawing of his new cartridge, complete with a "Hornet" headstamp.   
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 
Send TopicPrint