Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Strength of older single shots using smokeless (Read 23577 times)
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18055
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #30 - Dec 8th, 2017 at 9:10pm
Print Post  
Personally I believe the manufacturers did not list their load data for smokeless powders because they didn't want to share that info with other makers. Sharing BP info wasn't a big deal, as everyone knew how much BP went in a case. But smokeless performance could vary greatly depending on the powder burn rate, and amount of powder. So if a company came up with a good load, they didn't want to give that info away for free.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #31 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 9:15am
Print Post  
I too shoot mostly all smokeless. What I am talking about are guys who are demonstrating that they know little or nothing about what they are doing and have little or no interest in learning. Their only objective is to brag that my cartridge is bigger than your cartridge and to demonstrate that they can take more punishment when shooting.
My favorite is a guy shooting a 45-120 on a Ruger #1 action with a 28” barrel. First he asks what we all think of him buying the rifle. When I posted that the action was plenty strong enough the barrel was way too short to shoot a case full of black and that if he was planning on shooting smokeless a 45-70 had more than enough boiler room to take him to the edges of reason for a lot less money. He ignored me.
The next posts are why is my 45-120 leading for the last two inches of the barrel? I suggested a the wheel weights he was casting with were too hard or the bullet was a poor fit, or he was using the wrong lube. He decided it was his powder choice and is now asking how many strokes with a wire brush it takes others to get the lead out of their bores. 

40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fogman
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 155
Joined: Mar 10th, 2016
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #32 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 10:52am
Print Post  
I have an original Remington Creedmoor RB 44S and I cannot imagine loading it with smokeless. For 1885 rifles and later a case can be made for smokeless since that powder came out in 1884. But why shoot an original that was made for black powder or expensive new Sharps with smokeless? Challenge yourself with some real black powder loads. Very satisfying to load and shoot my Creedmoor with breech seated paper patched bullets over some BP just like back in the day.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18055
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #33 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 3:07pm
Print Post  
Fogman wrote on Dec 9th, 2017 at 10:52am:
Challenge yourself with some real black powder loads. Very satisfying to load and shoot my Creedmoor with breech seated paper patched bullets over some BP just like back in the day.


That sounds contradictory to what every BP enthusiast has told me? They always say to not challenge yourself, and simply shoot a full case of BP. Where's the challenge?
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
rkba2nd
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 2103
Location: earth
Joined: Feb 16th, 2009
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #34 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 3:21pm
Print Post  
CLEANING
  

rkba2nd
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
art_ruggiero
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1222
Location: CT
Joined: Dec 14th, 2008
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #35 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 4:47pm
Print Post  
cleaning is easier than smokeless   art
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sureshot
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 338
Location: Snohomish
Joined: May 27th, 2007
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #36 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 5:01pm
Print Post  
Yes cleaning is much easier with black powder.
And if you use a rotary tumbler with either stainless steel pins or ceramic media cleaning brass is no big deal either.
However anyone who thinks that all it takes to make an accurate black powder  load is to fill the case with powder, has got a lot to learn.

Steve   Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #37 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 5:47pm
Print Post  
Anybody who thinks shooting black powder loads accurately is not a challenge should try it first then post their results for all to see. 
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jeff_Schultz
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Online



Posts: 1660
Location: Ransomville, NY
Joined: Apr 25th, 2004
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #38 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 5:59pm
Print Post  
  There is black powder accuracy, and there is smokeless powder accuracy.
  Anyone who says that black powder is as accurate as smokeless is spouting pure bullshit.
  

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo

“There is no situation so bad that it cannot be made worse."

  Confidence- The feeling you get before you fully understand the situation.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #39 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 6:13pm
Print Post  
I agree completely, that probably explains the reason for the popularity of smokeless powder, not the fact that it's easier to clean up the rifle later. My point was that to get reasonable accuracy using black powder is difficult, not just a matter of filling the case and shoving a bullet on top. To be clear I only use black in my rifles which are all chambered for black powder cartridges, as I feel this meets the traditional way.
However having said that should I ever decide to go the smokeless route I will probably just get a nice bolt action bench rest rifle in 6mm PPC and shoot .5  " groups or better all day, screw tradition eh.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ballardhepburnmich
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 598
Location: Scotts,mi.
Joined: May 20th, 2015
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #40 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 6:26pm
Print Post  
Fogman, what if we don't want to shoot black? 
Lee
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #41 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 6:32pm
Print Post  
All this reminds me about what someone said about V8 engines, I think it went something like, If you understand V8s no explanation is necessary, if you don't, no explanation is possible. Same with using black.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 3973
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #42 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 7:38pm
Print Post  
V8=smokeless
inline four banger=black 
no other explanation is possible
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #43 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 7:41pm
Print Post  
Might add that, these days, real black is getting harder and harder to get.  Last small lot ( 2# ) of Swiss I got, I had to drive and hour and a half each way to meet a fireworks licensee at a display site.  Big incentive to use smokeless.

  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Mick B
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1007
Location: 19 Ian Nicol St watson ACT aus
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Strength of older single shots using smokeless
Reply #44 - Dec 9th, 2017 at 9:07pm
Print Post  
Don't whinge, here where I am ( Canberra ) the only choice is Wano, and we have to drive to Sydney to get it, to make matters worse you are only allowed to transport 10 kg in your vehicle.  Goex has not been available in Australia for at least ten years, Swiss is obtainable in South Australia at about A$ 120 per kilo, Wano costs about A$70 per kilo, almost half the price of Swiss.
The maximum amount of black powder you are allowed to have in your possession in Canberra is 2 kg. Across the border in NSW the allowable limit is 10 kg, go figure.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 
Send TopicPrint