Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) 32-40 load (Read 10229 times)
Dellet
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1324
Joined: May 19th, 2017
Re: 32-40 load
Reply #30 - Jun 9th, 2017 at 11:11am
Print Post  
I have ran most of the powders mentioned here over the years in 300 Whisper/Blackout and most of the issues mentioned are the same.

Hodgdon used to have a warning in either their FAQ or reduced load section, warning to not reduce loads more than 3% instead of the normal 10% when using H110. 

I do personally know of one time a rifle was damaged using a reduced load and H110, but the situation was as described earlier in revolvers. We think what happened was due to erosion in the rifling. This allowed the bullet to jump and stop. At that point it was easier for the pressure to exit the magazine than to move the bullet.

H110/296 are most predictable with a 90-100% density. Below that ES gets high. Above that under compression, there always seems to be a tipping point where pressure stops building linear and starts building exponentially.

Lil'gun runs hot, so barrels heat up quickly and velocity changes. There is a lot of talk with revolver guys about erosion with forcing cones using high end of the chart loads.

The Shooters World/Lovex powders are basically Accurate powders. Explosia says they are using the same recipe's as when they supplied powders for Accurate. Accurate says "not so". 

I have used the Heavy pistol/D037-02 as a direct replacement for #9 with no more variation than you would expect from a lot change. You can interchange those powders in Quickload and the results are exact. Something that can't be said when running H110 against 296 in the same version.

Using Shooters World Blackout as a substitute for 1680 needs about a 6-8% reduction to maintain the same velocity, but it burns much cleaner.

300 MP might be a very good choice for the 32-40. It take 3-5% more powder to hit H110 velocity, but will have less pressure. It also seems to tolerate compression better.

Sadly I have no direct experience with the 32-40, only with the powders mentioned.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7675
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: 32-40 load
Reply #31 - Jun 9th, 2017 at 12:21pm
Print Post  
This is the info from Hodgdon's Annual Manual. These are fixed loads and note the primer used.

I tested and shot 296 in my 32/40, BSed with a RL 195 gr and 210-220 gc bullet(custom made 210 & 323471), using Fed F100 and F150 primers, in 1989-90. A few of my test results:

18.5 gr, F100, GC bullets, 1617 & 1592 fps, 6.1 & 8.2 SD

18.9 gr, F150, 210 GC, 1747 fps, 4.3 SD, 11 ES

20.0 gr, F150, 210 GC, 1828 fps, 4.3 SD, 9 ES

15.0 gr, F150, 1586 fps, RL 195 (20/1), 8 SD, 26 ES

14.0 gr, F150, 1444 fps, RL 200 gr (30/1), 7 SD, 15 ES

13.5 gr, F150, 1392 fps, RL 200 gr, 7.3 SD, 17 ES

12.5 gr, F150, 1300 fps, RL 200 gr, 6.9 SD, 18 ES, (74 deg)

My very first test of this powder was with a RL 208 gr bullet with the same load as above but @ 100+ deg temp, with a different chrograph, results:

1274 fps, 2.5 SD, 6 ES 

Testing was done with a 15 twist, Clerke HW. DO NOT use GC loads in weaker actions

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 
Send TopicPrint