Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around? (Read 19057 times)
boho
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 207
Location: NY New York
Joined: Feb 6th, 2012
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #30 - Nov 23rd, 2016 at 4:12pm
Print Post  
Roy, you are welcome to use mine. Only used once. It was made by PGT. I could email you the print. Russ Weber, helped me with the spec's at the time I had it made. His
wife was shooting the same. It is a 32-20/.30 the pilot is .03" But the drawing might be of interest if you like.

Bob Houghton
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RoyB
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 838
Location: Dartmouth, MA
Joined: Mar 28th, 2011
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #31 - Nov 23rd, 2016 at 4:42pm
Print Post  
I would love a copy of the drawing !  Thanks for the offer to use your reamer, that is very kind of you. But I'll have Dave Manson make me one so I have it for future projects.

Send the drawing to 

rvb100@comcast.net

Thanks
  

Roy B
Dartmouth, MA
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Cat_Whisperer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No 1, 9.3x74R

Posts: 3987
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #32 - Nov 23rd, 2016 at 7:12pm
Print Post  
boho wrote on Nov 23rd, 2016 at 4:12pm:
Roy, you are welcome to use mine. Only used once. It was made by PGT. I could email you the print. Russ Weber, helped me with the spec's at the time I had it made. His
wife was shooting the same. It is a 32-20/.30 the pilot is .03" But the drawing might be of interest if you like.

Bob Houghton


I, also, would like to see the drawing!  Can you take a picture or make a pdf of it?  At least the PTG information so's I could get a copy from them.
  

Cat Whisperer (trk)
Chief of Smoke
Pulaski Coehorn Works and Skunk Works
Drafted May 1970, Retired Maj. U.S.Army
assra #9885
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
SgtDog0311
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 391
Joined: Mar 19th, 2014
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #33 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 10:09am
Print Post  
marlinguy wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 11:28am:
Yeah, a .32-20 wont give any accuracy at 200 yds., and not sure how it can even reach that far? But it does great at 600 yds.!

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)


I'd want that Mo on my side in a gun fight.   Notice the wind in the sage brush while he's off the sticks:-)
  

Best Regards,
John
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18083
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #34 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 12:19pm
Print Post  
SgtDog0311 wrote on Nov 24th, 2016 at 10:09am:
marlinguy wrote on Nov 21st, 2016 at 11:28am:
Yeah, a .32-20 wont give any accuracy at 200 yds., and not sure how it can even reach that far? But it does great at 600 yds.!

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)


I'd want that Mo on my side in a gun fight.   Notice the wind in the sage brush while he's off the sticks:-)


Yeah, not only windy, but Mo is using the factory barrel sights! That would be tough with a decent vernier tang sight, let alone a little buckhorn barrel sight!
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3990
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #35 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 12:44pm
Print Post  
Aww, c'mon guys, you know the clang is just from all the parts in that Marlin falling back into a pile after a few seconds. Or, somebody in the background setting at tin cup of (something) on a log. Roll Eyes
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jy3855
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 368
Location: California
Joined: Jul 13th, 2015
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #36 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 12:51pm
Print Post  
SgtDog, Marlinguy, and I have all shot side-by-side with Mo. He doesn't need tricky editing or someone with a plate and hammer to edit in hits in his videos!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3990
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #37 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 3:07pm
Print Post  
Jus' pokin' fun, because I've watched several of the videos filmed there and always am delighted by the results as well as the fun every video seems to convey. Maybe a little jealousy tossed in to boot.  Cool
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jy3855
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 368
Location: California
Joined: Jul 13th, 2015
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #38 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 4:45pm
Print Post  
CF,

I figured you were just joking, and no offense taken or intended on my part. Just wanted others to know that Mo's the real deal. Great guy, too.

Pretty good with a handgun too - shoots way better than I can.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18083
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #39 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 7:44pm
Print Post  
What's funny is Mo and Wind had some skeptics on another forum who said their long range shooting wasn't possible, and was staged. Unlike your joking post CF, these guys were serious that it was faked.
But here's another video that always puts a smile on my face! I can hit the 400 sitting down, facing forward, off cross sticks. But then I'm only human.
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18083
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #40 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 7:47pm
Print Post  
calledflyer wrote on Nov 24th, 2016 at 3:07pm:
Jus' pokin' fun, because I've watched several of the videos filmed there and always am delighted by the results as well as the fun every video seems to convey. Maybe a little jealousy tossed in to boot.  Cool


I had never fired my old single shots past 200 yds. when I made my first visit to the U-Pick Sagebrush Ranch CF. In a matter of minutes the experts there had me on the 500 yd. dinger and hitting it occasionally. They're not only expert shots, but wonderful coaches!
We do this once a year, usually in July. About 20 people show up just to have fun and stretch their shooting distances out farther than usual!
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SgtDog0311
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 391
Joined: Mar 19th, 2014
Re: Is the 32-20 just a poor choice all around?
Reply #41 - Nov 24th, 2016 at 10:51pm
Print Post  
That grin of Wind's after that shot really cracks me up.   Knowing him you don't see that look of being pleased with himself too terribly often.  But the video I really like is of him which Mo captured is of his tagging the 1000yd dinger off-hand in about three shots.

Mo has got to be one of the nicest guys I've ever met.  Never saw anyone who took so much pleasure in other's successes.   
  

Best Regards,
John
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 
Send TopicPrint