Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Ladle Question (Read 2353 times)
Dales
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 321
Location: Western NY
Joined: Oct 21st, 2013
Ladle Question
Oct 15th, 2016 at 10:29am
Print Post  
I switched to ladle casting a couple of years ago and I now get much better bullets 32 cal. +-.1 grain .
A problem I do have is I see bits of dirt (dross) on the bullets from time to time .

Is there a bottom pour ladle being manufactured ? 

I have been looking at ways to convert one of my ladles .
Or am I being to picky ?

Dales
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1582
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Ladle Question
Reply #1 - Oct 15th, 2016 at 10:48am
Print Post  
The only bottom pour ladle I know of is the Rowell.  It pours from the side (like a Lee ladle) and the smallest size holds one pound.

I use my Rowell when I recover range lead, and pour ingots.  It does keep most of the crud out of the (extremely dirty) melt.  But pouring into a mould would require some major technique changes, at least for me, and a Joe Wieder course in "How to Build a Mighty Wrist."

My present technique with an Ideal or RCBS ladle is to flux well and skim at start, then use the ladle to sweep the surface away from a "fill zone" in my casting pot.  I get no dirt particles unless I push the casting session to the last half-inch at the bottom of the pot.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
old7groove
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 81
Location: San Diego
Joined: Jul 6th, 2016
Re: Ladle Question
Reply #2 - Oct 15th, 2016 at 11:15am
Print Post  
In the 1940's & 50's Kramer Bullet Molds (purchased by Saeco  Reloading) offered a bottom pour ladle. The ladle had a funnel shape and a thumb lever that operated a valve like that employed in bottom pour pots. The Kramer ladle held about the same amount of lead as a Lyman ladle. While I was with Saeco we considered reintroducing the Kramer ladle, but after extensive comparative testing alongside the bottom pour pot and the Saeco dip ladle we saw no advantage in the quality and quantity of bullets poured with a bottom pour ladle, it did have an advantage of speed when used with multi cavity molds having individual countersunk sprue holes. Ultimately, the manufacturing costs out weighed the target retail price.
7~
« Last Edit: Oct 15th, 2016 at 11:39am by old7groove »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18078
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Ladle Question
Reply #3 - Oct 15th, 2016 at 11:42am
Print Post  
Lyman still sells their bottom pour ladle for $22.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

RCBS Also has one:
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Oct 15th, 2016 at 4:00pm by marlinguy »  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4484
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: Ladle Question
Reply #4 - Oct 15th, 2016 at 12:55pm
Print Post  
The way to rid your ladle of dross that tends to hide inside is to invert it from time to time and tap the handle on the edge of the pot away from the side of the pot from which you are dipping.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint