ASSRA Forum - H&A 932

ASSRA Forum › General › Rifle Photos › H&A 932

(Moderator Group: Moderator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Page Index Toggle

Pages: [1] 2

Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies)

H&A 932 (Read 9873 times)

JSB30 Senior Forum Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Missouri Joined: Apr 30^th, 2011	H&A 932 Aug 29^th, 2016 at 5:06pm	Print Post
	Got my Hopkin Allen 932 out today to play with. Cal 32-20 WCF


	IP Logged

JSB30 Senior Forum Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Missouri Joined: Apr 30^th, 2011	Re: H&A 932 Reply #1 - Aug 29^th, 2016 at 5:08pm	Print Post
	One more. Using 4.7 Unique and a 90 grain bullet.


	IP Logged

Rebel Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4292 Location: Rockets and Race Cars Joined: Mar 9^th, 2015	Re: H&A 932 Reply #2 - Aug 29^th, 2016 at 6:28pm	Print Post
	I would have thought this is a 1932 Do you know the difference? I have what I think is a 1922 because of the checkering. Is it a conversion to centerfire? Aaron

	WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. Let's Go Sonny!
	IP Logged

JSB30 Senior Forum Member Offline Posts: 395 Location: Missouri Joined: Apr 30^th, 2011	Re: H&A 932 Reply #3 - Aug 29^th, 2016 at 7:03pm	Print Post
	I don not know what a 1932 is. I think cal is original. It does not have a cal marked on it. It does not have H&A name on it either. It is the same one that DeHaas has a picture of in H&A rifles in Single Shot Rifles and Actions. It has a trade name of Murdock on it.


	IP Logged

uscra112 Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4079 Location: Switzerland of Ohio Joined: May 7^th, 2007	Re: H&A 932 Reply #4 - Aug 29^th, 2016 at 8:22pm	Print Post
	A "1932" was a mid grade 932. The last two digits are always the caliber, and they were always rimfire as far as anybody knows. 932 had a round barrel. 1932 had an octagon barrel, better wood, and some of H&A's "checkering", for which they hired left-handed bears. That one looks comparable to the top-line 2932 shown in a reproduction catalog that I have. Really decent wood, and better and more extensive checkering. Nice find! They are ridiculously easy to convert to .32 Colt centerfire, or with a reamer to .32 S&W. Only problem is the extractor, which doesn't extract very far. Needs a strong fingernail or a tool to get the fired case all the way out. The lack of H&A rollstamps is fairly common. H&A sold guns wholesale to anybody who would market them, and the marketer used his own stamps. My 1932 is marked "Enders Royal". In catalogs they did offer the 2938, which was chambered for .38 S&W centerfire. The only other centerfire they cataloged in this action was the .25-20 Stevens, in the "Schuetzen" model 3925. I can't find any evidence that they ever offered them in .32-20, but given their usually desperate condition they might well have for a gun to be marketed by a reseller. Or this one might be a gunsmith rework. Also in my catalog they claimed that the 2932 was rifled with their "patented increase twist". I'd love to see if that is true, and the O.P.'s rifle might provide the answer.
	« Last Edit: Aug 29^th, 2016 at 9:07pm by uscra112 »
	<div class=
	IP Logged

Rebel Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4292 Location: Rockets and Race Cars Joined: Mar 9^th, 2015	Re: H&A 932 Reply #5 - Aug 29^th, 2016 at 9:44pm	Print Post
	Phil, here are my two H&A 22's Can you identify the models? The second one with the side takedown has some case left on the upper tang. Aaron
	« Last Edit: Aug 29^th, 2016 at 9:52pm by Rebel »
	WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. Let's Go Sonny!
	IP Logged

Rebel Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4292 Location: Rockets and Race Cars Joined: Mar 9^th, 2015	Re: H&A 932 Reply #6 - Aug 29^th, 2016 at 9:49pm	Print Post
	Phil, 32-20 seems a bit much in these frames. My H&A/Merwin & Hulbert 32-20 is in a larger frame. Whatcha think? Aaron

	WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. Let's Go Sonny!
	IP Logged

uscra112 Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4079 Location: Switzerland of Ohio Joined: May 7^th, 2007	Re: H&A 932 Reply #7 - Aug 30^th, 2016 at 12:30am	Print Post
	Yah, I kinda think .32-20 is a bit much in the small frames. The only thing holding that barrel in is the takedown screw. The one with the takedown screw on the side is what was called a "Junior". Basic design ran from 1887(?) to 1898(?). I don't know if there were premium versions of the Junior. Mine has a round barrel, where yours is octagon. Maybe. Just make things difficult, Charlie Carder says there were Juniors made 1898 to 1900 that had the takedown screw on the bottom like the post 1900 version. So your Junior is definitely pre 1898. If the barrel is marked Merwin and Hulbert it is pre-1896. M&H was the marketer for H&A, but they went bankrupt in '96. The first photos look like a 1922. Sometime around 1898 they lengthened the frame of the Junior and moved the takedown screw to the bottom front. After the 1900 fire these were renamed 922/1922/2922. Octagon barrel but rather plain wood says 1922, since 922s had round barrels, and the 2922 would have much better wood. Cornell Publications has a number of H&A catalogs, and a reprint of the Vorisek book. Maybe also the Charlie Carder book.
	« Last Edit: Aug 30^th, 2016 at 1:16am by uscra112 »
	<div class=
	IP Logged

Rebel Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4292 Location: Rockets and Race Cars Joined: Mar 9^th, 2015	Re: H&A 932 Reply #8 - Aug 30^th, 2016 at 12:46am	Print Post
	Thanks Phil, Aaron

	WARNING: This post may contain material offensive to those who lack wit, humor, common sense and supporting factual or anecdotal evidence. Let's Go Sonny!
	IP Logged

Bent_Ramrod Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 1451 Location: Southern Arizona Joined: Feb 8^th, 2006	Re: H&A 932 Reply #9 - Aug 30^th, 2016 at 8:50pm	Print Post
	I think the 1922/1932 was characterized by that reverse curlicue in the end of the guard lever that the OP's and Rebel's first rifle has, and a noticeable perch belly in the lower line of the buttstock. The 922/932 has the full curve in the end of the lever like Rebel's second rifle and a straighter buttstock. The 1922 I had for a while wasn't checkered. My incomplete .32-20 is the earlier version small frame with the crossways barrel retaining screw, and the Merwin and Hulbert barrel markings. When the new version came out, the company must have realized that a smokeless cartridge might get into the chamber and dropped the chambering. The design does look neat. A mid size frame version, cast of modern alloy with a screw in barrel and tight tolerances in the parts, would make a pretty nifty rifle, with chamberings on the order of the "Little Sharps." I wonder that somebody hasn't tried to market one.


	IP Logged

BP Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 8039 Location: Westside Joined: Aug 27^th, 2006	Re: H&A 932 Reply #10 - Aug 30^th, 2016 at 10:16pm	Print Post
	Something else noticable is the varying distances between the extractor screw and lever screw between the different models. They are closer together in the first two of Rebel's pictures, and spaced further apart in the last three pictures.
	« Last Edit: Aug 30^th, 2016 at 10:21pm by BP »
	There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves. Proud Noodlehead
	IP Logged

Chuckster Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 2224 Location: Colorado Joined: May 15^th, 2008	Re: H&A 932 Reply #11 - Aug 30^th, 2016 at 10:51pm	Print Post
	The design similarities between a Hopkins & Allen and a Walker-Hepburn are amazing. Not sure who copied who. Chuck


	IP Logged

uscra112 Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4079 Location: Switzerland of Ohio Joined: May 7^th, 2007	Re: H&A 932 Reply #12 - Aug 31^st, 2016 at 2:07am	Print Post
	Bent_Ramrod wrote on Aug 30^th, 2016 at 8:50pm: The design does look neat. A mid size frame version, cast of modern alloy with a screw in barrel and tight tolerances in the parts, would make a pretty nifty rifle, with chamberings on the order of the "Little Sharps." I wonder that somebody hasn't tried to market one. It would be if the new maker adds a bit of angle to the block mortise so it will chamber a tight cartridge better, and do something about that miserable extractor.

	<div class=
	IP Logged

BP Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 8039 Location: Westside Joined: Aug 27^th, 2006	Re: H&A 932 Reply #13 - Aug 31^st, 2016 at 5:38pm	Print Post
	Reshape the lower forward portion of the extractor so that the lever bumps it, slightly before the lever reaches its forward stop, and the lever roller reaches the bevel on the spring. And use a spring that matches the stiffness of the original. The extractor still has the original short travel, but is much snappier. By altering it so the lever drives the extractor, when you change the length of the link to make it a centerfire because someone told you it's so easy to do, you don't have to worry about having just screwed up the orginal geometry of the extractor timing. This is for the action that has the closer spaced lever and extractor screws as shown in Rebel's first two pictures.
	« Last Edit: Aug 31^st, 2016 at 5:52pm by BP »
	There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves. Proud Noodlehead
	IP Logged

uscra112 Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 4079 Location: Switzerland of Ohio Joined: May 7^th, 2007	Re: H&A 932 Reply #14 - Aug 31^st, 2016 at 6:15pm	Print Post
	Exactly ! Might cost a little bit more, but it would make a better rifle. The original design was cheap to make, and H&A was all about cheap.

	<div class=
	IP Logged

Page Index Toggle

Pages: [1] 2

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Board Index ‹ Board Top

Top

ASSRA Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid XHTML

Valid CSS

Powered by Perl

Source Forge

Page completed in 1.2583 seconds.