Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) opinions requested 32-20 loads (Read 14470 times)
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #15 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 1:50pm
Print Post  
Ken Waters has provided good information.
While he may have listed "only .32-20 handgun loads" , it is worth remembering that those 32-20 handgun loads were basically equivalent to the pressure levels of the Rifle loads introduced by WRA back in 1882 when WRA made the 32 WCF cartridge available for the Model 1873 Repeating Rifle.
So those Ken Waters .32-20 handgun loads are also in effect Rifle loads, but they are not equivalent to the later higher pressure Hi-Vel loadings developed for use in the stronger Model 1892 Rifle.

PS: WRA did provide a .32 M. 92 Special W.H.V. loading using the 115gr bullet (advertised at ~1635fps) before the Model 92 WHV loading using the jacketed 80gr hollowpoint bullet was developed.
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #16 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 2:40pm
Print Post  
From Lyman #44 for 32-20 and 4227. No pressure data given. These are what I have heard called "rifle loads" since I got my 1st 32-20 Win LW in early 1950s.

100gr Jacketed
13gr 1720 fps
15gr 1985 fps

118 gr Lyman311359 Lead GC
12gr 1623 fps
14gr 1865 fps

From Ideal #38 loading manual No pressure data given.

Lyman3118 plain base, cast 115gr
8,6 gr 4759 1475 fps
11,0 gr 4759 1575 fps

80 gr jacketed
12,0 gr 4759 1605 fps
13,0 gr 2400 1845 fps 
17,0 gr 4227 1975 fps

115gr jacketed
10,8 2400 1555 fps
4759 11,5 1636 fps

USE at YOUR OWN RISK -- Better Yet, find copy of these old manuals and verify.

Grisen
« Last Edit: Jul 7th, 2016 at 3:43pm by svartkruttgris#369 »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #17 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 3:10pm
Print Post  
svartkruttgris#369 wrote on Jul 7th, 2016 at 1:48pm:
Paco Kelly's article " (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)"
Lists a wide range of 32-20 loads, over a wide range of chamber pressures.Grisen


Excellent site, though I haven't shot any kind of levergun in decades.   
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #18 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 3:20pm
Print Post  
BP wrote on Jul 7th, 2016 at 1:50pm:
So those Ken Waters .32-20 handgun loads are also in effect Rifle loads, but they are not equivalent to the later higher pressure Hi-Vel loadings developed for use in the stronger Model 1892 Rifle.


Maybe, but he doesn't include slower powders that wouldn't burn efficiently in a pistol-length barrel. 

Would be very surprised, however, if he had not written about rifle loads in a "Pet Loads" column that didn't make it into my ed. of the book.  (Sold my collection of Handloader from #1 up to about 1990 several years ago, or I'd try to find out.)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
John Boy
Ex Member


Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #19 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 3:31pm
Print Post  
Lee 311-100-2R

BC – 0.174
Dia – 0.311
Length – 0.583
Load Fps – 990 (4.1gr W231)
Twist – 18
Stability Factor = 2.49 Maximum Stability
Twist – 16
Stability Factor = 3.15 Maximum Stability



Load fps – 793 (3.2gr W231)
Twist – 18
Stability Factor = 2.31 Maximum Stability
Twist – 16
Stability Factor = 2.92 Maximum Stability

I have been doing the calculations today because I'm buying a Rossi M92 in 357 to be lined with 32-20 liner.  No issues: 32-20 rounds feed into the 357 magazine - chamber and extract with no modifications needed  Smiley

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #20 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 3:32pm
Print Post  
The Lyman #43 Reloading Handbook contains rifle data for the 32-20, showing:
- SUG. GRS. and SUG. MAX GRS.  for 2400, 4227, 4759 and Unique powders with 80gr jacketed, 100gr jacketed and 115gr jacketed bullets
- SUG. GRS. (SUG. MAX GRS. is NOT provided) for Unique, H240, 2400, 4227 and 4759 powders for cast bullets from the Ideal/Lyman moulds #311419 (with a note that "For shorter range #311252 may be substitued), #31133, #3118, #311316 and #311359

The #43 manual also contains HANDGUN data for the 32-20, showing: 
- SUG. GRS. and SUG. MAX GRS.  for Bullseye, #6, 5066, Unique and 4759 powders for cast bullets from Ideal/Lyman moulds #313249, #313226 and #3118

As always, compare data with other loading manuals.
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #21 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 3:36pm
Print Post  
Here is what I have from a fellow shooter that is also a long-time 32-20 shooter. I do not have Ken Waters Pet Loads book, so cannot verify. Presume these are all for Lyman3118. I did check the 10,0 gr 4759 in my 32.20 LW with 28" barrel using Saceo322 120 gr bullet and got 1480 fps.

Ken Waters in Pet Loads lists these 4759 loads in rifles (no pressure data):
 
115 gr.     8.5     SR-4759         1254
   "             9.0       "       "           1374
   "             9.5       "       "           1479
   "           10.0       "      "            1585

AS USUAL; USE AT YOUR OWN RISK

Note that not all these data I have posted agree in detail, as is usual.

Grisen
« Last Edit: Jul 7th, 2016 at 3:44pm by svartkruttgris#369 »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #22 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 4:05pm
Print Post  
Quote:
...
I have been doing the calculations today because I'm buying a Rossi M92 in 357 to be lined with 32-20 liner.  No issues: 32-20 rounds feed into the 357 magazine - chamber and extract with no modifications needed  Smiley


Got a chuckle out of this, thinking of all the WRA Model 92's in 25-20 and 32 WCF that were converted to 357 Mag,
and now the process is being reversed.    Grin
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #23 - Jul 7th, 2016 at 11:22pm
Print Post  
Link to download pdf of Ideal #38
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)


« Last Edit: Jul 8th, 2016 at 10:13am by svartkruttgris#369 »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #24 - Jul 8th, 2016 at 2:26am
Print Post  
Grisen, 

Your #44 link doesn't work.
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #25 - Jul 8th, 2016 at 10:15am
Print Post  
Thanks!

Bummer! Thought I checked it, guess not. I did download it from somewhere years ago.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 18068
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #26 - Jul 8th, 2016 at 11:38am
Print Post  
This is my friend John shooting an 1894 Marlin .32-20 at 650 yds. with good accuracy. 
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

And another friend on the same target with his 1894 Marlin .32-20 You'll notice he's got no long range sights, and is using his "guesstimating" skills to hold over, and allow wind drift.:
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

We'll be doing this again next week at our annual get together!
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
svartkruttgris#369
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2980
Location: Colorado, Norway, Sweden
Joined: Oct 28th, 2014
Re: opinions requested 32-20 loads
Reply #27 - Jul 16th, 2016 at 1:14pm
Print Post  
Here is link to a bunch of info about old factory loads in 32-20, 25-20, 44-40, 38-40

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Grisen
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint