Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Over Primer Wads (Read 16106 times)
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1827
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #15 - Jun 4th, 2016 at 6:20pm
Print Post  
Here's a different article by Wayne McLerran that may give you a better idea of what you're looking for.  I've tried them and didn't see a benefit but it's best for you to try both ways and see what the target says.  Problem I have is the target says one thing on one day but when I try to repeat it, it tells me something different on another day.  There are primers out there that do have lower brisance.  Bob

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1582
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #16 - Jun 4th, 2016 at 9:09pm
Print Post  
There was a large selection of "weaker," or less brisant, primers available back in The Good Old Days.  People like Pope, Roberts and Donaldson used to write that after a certain primer became unavailable, either a whole new loading regime became necessary for a cartridge, or the cartridge itself was never as legendarily accurate again.  All these black powder primers went into the discard when smokeless powders came along, and the primers for smokeless now are either strong, stronger, or extra strong; take your choice.  Like the Fries at Fast Food places; how do you order a "small" anymore?

The argument for attenuating the effect of these primers back to those of the black powder era doesn't strike me as unscientific or specious. I would love to stop using primer wads because they are an extra loading step I would prefer to avoid, if possible.  Whether it is voodoo or real, every bench test I've made at 500 and 600 yards with and without the primer wads show a slightly better grouping with the same loads with the primer wads.  And since a lot of effort goes into loading those cartridges anyway, the addition of one more step doesn't increase the effort that much, for the effect sought.

The old buff hunters had simple hand tools, including a "follower" which compressed the powder column and seated a wad, and a "shell reducer," which squeezed the shell mouth, if necessary, so the bullet wouldn't shake out.  The ancients were surprisingly modern in a lot of ways.  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bruce moulds
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 290
Location: the antipodes
Joined: Mar 14th, 2015
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #17 - Jun 4th, 2016 at 10:54pm
Print Post  
what bent ramrod said again.
adding that testing at 1000 yds shows improvement in vert consistently in both my rifles with fed l.p. primers and wads in the primer pockets.
I have a friend who will pull targets for me, and plot shots, and can sometimes book a range.
at those ranges, vert differences really show up, but windage is harder to measure. Cheesy
strangely fed seems better than cci l.p. which are also good primers.
there comes a point where the wad can get too thick and make things worse. computer printing paper has worked as well as anything, but 9 lb onionskin works well also, singly or doubled up.
keep safe,
bruce.
  

ventum est amicus meus
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1827
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #18 - Jun 5th, 2016 at 9:57am
Print Post  
Bruce,
There are two primers that have been tested with very good results in smokeless rounds with low brisance and S.D.'s.  I have been wanting to try them in my BPTR rifle but the one source has now dried up in the U.S. and the other has now become available which I plan on trying this summer.  The one that is  available is a Czech primer by Sellier & Bellot and the other is Russian made and sold under several names, Wolf, Tula and Murom.
Do you have them available down under and have you tried them with any good results?  Bob
« Last Edit: Jun 5th, 2016 at 12:48pm by Old-Win »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
colo native
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 760
Location: Barren Ridge, Va
Joined: Dec 27th, 2007
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #19 - Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:21am
Print Post  
it does help when using #9 powder.......
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
4570mike
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 460
Location: On the Peninsula
Joined: Apr 11th, 2013
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #20 - Jun 5th, 2016 at 7:57pm
Print Post  
Thanks everyone for your input.  I should have mentioned from the beginning that I'm using Black Horn 209 and Federal Magnum 215 rifle primers.  It does seem counter productive using over primer wads if it makes the primer less brisant since BH209 requires a hot primer to set it off. Maybe there is an advantage to dispersing the flash into the powder charge?  The kernel size of BH209 is small and there could be the possibility of some variable amount creeping into the touch hole.
Using news paper for the wad, I have never found any remnants of it any where.  I have to assume it's consumed with the burning of the powder.
Anyways, I can't complain about accuracy and the limited chronographing  I have done showed consistent velocities.
I guess I shouldn't tinker with this just to find out something else isn't as good.
Thanks again,
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bruce moulds
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 290
Location: the antipodes
Joined: Mar 14th, 2015
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #21 - Jun 5th, 2016 at 8:12pm
Print Post  
bob,
the Russian primers from the tula factory are available here in oz.
the ones I tried are the standard large rifle ones. I believe that there are harder cupped, hotter ones, but could be wrong there.
I have found them to be excellent in 2 different fclass barrels.
they work ok in my black powder guns, but not as good as fed l.p.
some fclass guys are getting good s.d figures and accuracy with sellier and bellot, but it is early days as yet with them.
the Russian primers seem a little larger in diameter than American ones, which can help with slightly loose primer pockets.
keep safe,
bruce.
  

ventum est amicus meus
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #22 - Jun 6th, 2016 at 9:06am
Print Post  
It depends on what you are doing and with what powder. Black Powder will ignite fairly easily the current fashion is to use either newspaper or tissue paper over the primer to blunt the force of the primer explosion. Smokeless is harder to ignite and requires a hotter primer than Black. In the early years of smokeless you could buy primers for black powder or smokeless power. If you look at some of the early duplex loads you will see that the old timers used a priming charge of Black powder and a main charge of smokeless this was to properly light off the smokeless with the easier to ignite Black powder. 
  Some of this is fashion somebody tries some thing new and if he shoots a good score then everyone flocks to the new thing. I can remember not so long ago when shooters were telling others that only a magnum primer would do on larger cases.
  Try it and see if it helps you if it does then go for it! If not experiment and find your own way.

40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1582
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #23 - Jun 6th, 2016 at 10:17am
Print Post  
I have a couple of renegade ex-black powder shooter friends who are having very good results with Blackhorn 209.  It shoots accurately and the arduous cleaning between shots is eliminated, so they think it's worth the extra expense and the possible excommunication from the Black Powder community, if any of the Fundamentalists find out.  But they are in a completely different area of inquiry than black powder.  209 was reportedly formulated to require 209 shotgun primers in in-line muzzle loaders, so it would need quite a kick.  Putting a primer wad in would be counterintuitive, of course.

You might go to standard Large Rifle primers (no wad) if you want to check out milder ignition for accuracy improvements.  I would suggest a minimum distance of 300 yards because, as Bruce Moulds says, the basic problem is vertical stringing and this may not be apparent at shorter ranges.

40Rod, I can't think of a place where your signature line is more appropriate that in this discussion!  Smiley

Another friend did quite well for himself going to a monthly BPCR Silhouette shoot.  The other shooters would ask him about his loads and when he mentioned Primers, they'd say, "No wonder your scores are so low!  Nobody shoots those Standard primers; we're all shooting Magnums!  It's the only way to go!"

He'd ask them if they had any Standard primers left.  "Oh, yeah; I got 3/4 of a case of them; don't know what I'm going to do with them, since they're worthless to me."  My friend would mention a very low price and go home with the "useless" primers.

Next month he'd be shooting Magnum primers, and the same experts would go "What's the matter with you?  Nobody shoots Magnum primers; the only way to go are Bench Rest primers!"  The friend would negotiate a low price for the remaining Magnum primers these people had and take them home.  Next time it would be Pistol primers, next time something else.  He'd buy all the "worthless" remainders he could.

The friend may never win the Nationals at Raton, but he has all the Primers he'll ever need, at way, way below wholesale.   Grin
« Last Edit: Jun 6th, 2016 at 10:31am by Bent_Ramrod »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
IOwnDoubles
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 120
Joined: Nov 7th, 2013
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #24 - Jun 7th, 2016 at 12:41am
Print Post  
As a very limited BP shooter who is interested in it and trying to learn, I am confused... in the latest BPCR News magazine there is an article where the writer talks about using MAGNUM primers!

Isn't that just the opposite of what you guys are all saying?

Other than my shotguns, I have only used BP in my .577/.450 martini. (it is a kick to hunt preserve birds with BP shotguns, the dog is the first one to know if you hit or missed Smiley)

Just asking so I can learn. Cheesy
Jerry
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1734
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #25 - Jun 7th, 2016 at 12:59am
Print Post  
Blackhorn 209 is NOT black powder, it is a nitro powder, so BP rules and sensitivities  don't apply.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1582
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #26 - Jun 7th, 2016 at 5:14pm
Print Post  
IOwnDoubles,

The subject of proper priming of black powder cartridge loads has "evolved" over the years.  Spencer Wolf started the ball rolling by stating that the original .45-70 Govt cartridge was made with a large excess of priming compound because of reliability issues.  They put in a lot of extra priming compound so the fat firing pin had a chance of setting something off in there when the shot was fired.  This was logical since the Henry and the 1866 Winchester rimfire rifles had dual firing pin ends to more surely fire the priming in the rimfire cartridges they used.

Wolf said the side effect of the extra priming was that it blasted the black powder column in the shell to smithereens, increasing the combustion surface and, supposedly, making the cartridge accurate in the old days.  Modern loaders who had trouble getting accuracy with their old Trapdoors were using modern standard primers, which didn't have this blasting effect.  So the recommendation was to use Magnum primers as the closest thing to the overlarge primers of old.

Everybody tried that for a while and then some brave soul tried some normal primers (using the black powder cartridge loading techniques that had also been rediscovered and refined) and got better accuracy than with the Magnum primers.  Suddenly the theories changed from needing to light as much black powder off as possible to having as controlled a burn as possible, with minimal pressurization in the shell, and minimum movement of the bullet from the pressure, from the primer ignition.  Then, Benchrest primers, Match primers and even Large Pistol primers were used to make as mild an ignition as possible.  Some even modified their shells so Small Rifle or even Pistol primers could be used.  Somewhere in there the Primer Wads started being used and advocated by some.

Basically, it's whatever works for you.  I should be proof against this voodoo since I did some of my best BPCR work (coincidentally, before my eyes started giving out) with a Mason jar full of Frankford Arsenal corrosive Large Rifle primers, although I eventually did use newsprint Primer Wads with them.  I now use Federal Gold Medal Match Large Pistol primers, with a punched out wad in the primer pocket.  Just neurotic, I guess. Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7659
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #27 - Jun 7th, 2016 at 5:29pm
Print Post  
Something else, in support of the milder primers. I shot Slug Guns for a few years and the guys that got me into it (now part of the ODG's) used Remington 1 1/2 primers exclusividely.

If you think that Slug Gunners are not experimentors, you would be wrong! They where always trying to find something to get a edge on the other guy, just as they did before the single shots, came into favor. They could even shoot their initials at 40 Rod (220 yds).

These more modern ODG's, did there home work, long before the "modern" Buff Hunters and even the BP, Long Range shooters, with straight BP.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 12355
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #28 - Jun 7th, 2016 at 6:12pm
Print Post  
How do you get a wad over the primer? Paste it onto the head of the case? What if your head space is already on the tight side? I don't get it. 

       Joe.
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
desert-dude
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 439
Location: Selah
Joined: Jul 23rd, 2013
Re: Over Primer Wads
Reply #29 - Jun 7th, 2016 at 11:04pm
Print Post  
Several things  come to mind. 
1. Some years ago Precision Shooting mentioned in a column that EU berdan primed
308 loads were more accurate than the US stuff. 

2. Sulfur is an ingredient of BP to help ignition. I wonder what would happen is some
one extracted the sulfur with carbon disulfide taking adequate precautions against the 
very low flashpoint of CS2. 

3. Has anyone tried cutting thin paper wads of newsprint or even wimpier paper
and stuffed them in the primer pocket then seated the primer?

4. Is anyone having success with SC powders at the low pressures/velocities we 
load?

Sorry, just couldn't resist rocking the boat.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Send TopicPrint