Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) another breach seating question (Read 5169 times)
argie1891
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 268
Location: selah, washington
Joined: Jul 8th, 2010
another breach seating question
Mar 22nd, 2016 at 2:37am
Print Post  
I know I am becoming a real pain asking these stupid questions but I really don't know where else to go. a shooting buddy of mine has a 38-55 high wall I think it is ubirti. He wants to start breach seating. my real question does the factory throat work as is or is a throat reamer necessary? I tried to seat a bullet into my Winchester 38-55 and the complete bullet was engraved causing extreme pressure to be applied to the seating tool. now it might be that the throat on his rifle is longer or just bigger. I am going to attach a picture of both the breach seating tool I made and a bullet I drove out to shot the lands engraving, and also the tool I made for breach seating. maybe my tool is no good but it is one I saw a picture of so I copied it. I may have to post 2 messages as there are 2 pictures. I want to thank the group in advance for their help and putting up with my questions. argie1891  aka joe
  

if you think you have it figured out  then you just dont understand
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smoke
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 850
Location: San Diego
Joined: Feb 24th, 2013
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #1 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 2:43am
Print Post  
argie1891 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2016 at 2:37am:
my real question does the factory throat work as is or is a throat reamer necessary?

Barrels chambered for breech seating do not usually have throats, just a lead ahead of the case mouth so that seating the bullet is eased.

After all, the whole point to breech seating is to engrave the rifling on the bullet and to center the bullet in the bore prior to discharge.  A throat would just make it more difficult to seat the bullet accurately.
  

I refuse to spend my life worrying about what I eat. There is no pleasure worth foregoing just for an extra 3 years in the geriatric ward. John Mortimer
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
argie1891
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 268
Location: selah, washington
Joined: Jul 8th, 2010
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #2 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 2:54am
Print Post  
thanks for your reply.. what I want to know is  should the complete bullet be engraved as it takes so much pressure to seat the bullet I put a picture of the bullet in the post.  and maybe the problem is I made the wrong type of seating tool all I know the seater almost needs to be driven in with a hammer
  

if you think you have it figured out  then you just dont understand
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smoke
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 850
Location: San Diego
Joined: Feb 24th, 2013
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #3 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 3:05am
Print Post  
argie1891 wrote on Mar 22nd, 2016 at 2:54am:
all I know the seater almost needs to be driven in with a hammer

Anything that distorts the base of the bullet is likely to have a negative effect on accuracy.  Seaters like those made by Russ Weber push the bullet into the rifling without damaging the bullet (assuming the bullet is soft enough).

As for seating depth, if you page down to the "breach seating depth" thread (cf. forum.assra.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1458280168), you'll find a nice discussion of how much of the bullet needs to be engraved.  

You may be surprised to learn that there are different opinions about that Smiley

  

I refuse to spend my life worrying about what I eat. There is no pleasure worth foregoing just for an extra 3 years in the geriatric ward. John Mortimer
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 7647
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #4 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 3:11am
Print Post  
The throat that a chamber has, really isn't to important but, the fit of the bullet is.

Most of us, use a tapered bullet. with the front band .002 - .003 smaller than the groove diameter. The bands enlarge from there, up to groove diameter but, the base band should be about .001 - .002 larger than the groove.

With that configuration, you should be able to BS with your seater. I used a seater about like yours for a couple of years with a 32/40.

It looks like it's adjusted about right but, it's hard to tell from the picture. Not quite all the base band should be engraved. Try to get that around .030-.040, to start. After you get a basic, good load, you can adjust it both ways.

I've been using the Russ Weber method for the last few years (a little different than above) and have had good accuracy with it but, that will get you shooting. Randy might post a picture of the Webber method for you.

Although a custom mold is expensive, it's cheap compared to the frustration of trying to seat a bullet that's larger than discribed above. After spending the $ for the rifle, it will be the best $ you spend for accuracy.

Put a add on the forum for a BSing bullet of your caliber and see if you can find one that way.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
argie1891
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 268
Location: selah, washington
Joined: Jul 8th, 2010
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #5 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 3:15am
Print Post  
yes I know I started that thread with a question. maybe I worded it incorrectly     I just think it is taking too much force to seat the bullet. so is my seating tool the problem. the throat or what. the bullet is cast soft like 30-1 lead tin. so I know the bullet isn't too hard. anyway I think this thread needs to be deleted as for some reason I am not asking the question so it can be understood.
  

if you think you have it figured out  then you just dont understand
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #6 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 4:07am
Print Post  
A tapered bullet will work best for breach seating in a fixed ammo chamber and it still will probably require mechanical leverage to push it in.
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
argie1891
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 268
Location: selah, washington
Joined: Jul 8th, 2010
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #7 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 4:19am
Print Post  
now we are getting somewhere. what is the diference between a chamber made for fixed ammo and one made for breach seating. I am a long time cast bullet shooter fixed ammo and have had to throat several rifles because the lead into the rifling was so sharp that accuracy was affected. some chambers seem to have about a 30 degree and I have found a 1.5 degree taper  throat works well in fixed ammo. that said I don't want to mess with the throat unless it needs to be done. as I really know very little about breach seating and am trying to learn I do know I am asking some stupid questions. I have found that if someone else has already invented the wheel there is no reason for me to go to trouble. I try to learn from others and if I ever learn something I would share it.  the picture of the bullet shows how the bullet enters the rifling very close to the case mouth. argie
  

if you think you have it figured out  then you just dont understand
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzenmiester
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 6707
Location: Cool Wet Side of WA
Joined: Apr 27th, 2008
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #8 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 4:23am
Print Post  
The gunsmiths will have to answer that. I have BS rifles with and without a BS throat.  The throated ones push in easy and the others require mechanical leverage even with a tapered bullet.    I'm sure a straight full sized or slightly over would have to be hammered in as you said above.
  

"some old things are lovely, warm still with life ... of the forgotten men who made them." - D.H. Lawrence
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #9 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 8:58am
Print Post  
There is an excellent article that Ken Meyer wrote for the news a number of years ago on this subject. I reprinted it in the Journal a couple of years ago on the theory that every ten years or so there are new shooters who need this kind of basic information. The point of kens article is that you need to fit the bullet to the type of throat that you have. There is more than just tapered and straight-sided bullets out there. If you are interested I am sure that you can get copies of the article from the archive.

40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RSW
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1297
Location: Arizona
Joined: Sep 8th, 2006
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #10 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 11:01am
Print Post  
argie 
To get the most out of the bullet in the photo you posted, here is what I suggest you consider doing:
1. If you have not already done so, slug your barrel, measure that slug to determine the precise groove diameter
2. Measure your cast bullet
3. If the cast bullet is greater than .002" over groove diameter, size the bullet so it is .001" greater than groove diameter*

*Order a push-through custom sizing die from Lee Percision. Lube bullets prior to sizing them. I have ordered several custom Lee sizing dies in the past several years and each has been dead-nuts to my specification. I have successfully used those dies on both tapered and straight cylindrical bullets. You can find out how to order such a die on Lee's web site.
As a secondary issue, I suggest you shorten the handle on your breech seater to about half the length in your posted photo. The only reason for a dog-leg in the handle is to clear a tang sight.
With a bullet .001" greater than groove diameter, they will seat much easier and accuracy should improve.
  

Randy W
ASSRA 10211  -  ISSA 125
There are indeed two Americas. Simply put, it is not the haves and have nots. The two Americans are in reality divided into those who do and those who don't.
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 7647
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #11 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 11:06am
Print Post  
Quote:
I just think it is taking too much force to seat the bullet.
 

It looks to me from the picture, that the bullet is at least .003 larger than the groove. That will cause it to take to much force, in any alloy.

Your BSer has to much offset, I used a straight seater in two of my HW's. The only reason to use a offset is if your shooting a tang sight.

With a SAAMI 32/40 chamber and a tapered 200 gr bullet, I can BS my rifles with palm pressure. one push and then a rap with my palm, to feel the BSer bottom out.

Yours being a 38/55, it could take a little more pressure, because of the larger area of the barrel.

If you have the skill, you can make a BSer as I'll picture. It's for a 44 1/2 but, I use a simular one on my 30/40 HW.

The first one is the inline one that I used on my 32/40 HW.

Even with a BSer, if the bullet is to oversize, you'll deform it to much, getting it in and loose the accuracy.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #12 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 11:32am
Print Post  
Joe if you have some Cerrosafe I would make a chamber cast so you can get a clear picture of what you have to work with, freebore, leade, etc. and then you can work off all of the deminsion to come up with a fix. If you choose to do so don't forget to pay attention to the chamber cast deminsion changes based on time. I make and keep casts of all of my chambers for current and future use. 

JLouis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #13 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 11:48am
Print Post  
Joe looking at the bullet does the flatened out area on the grease groove bands go all the way around the bullet as it appears not to? To me the bullet appears to be nicely engraved and not really overly so and that flat area on the two bands could be from the bullet entering at a slight angle. If so it could be some what decieving. It also appears to be a cylindrical bullet? and if so they are just simply harder to seat especially so with a palm seater and not at all uncommon.

JLouis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
argie1891
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 268
Location: selah, washington
Joined: Jul 8th, 2010
Re: another breach seating question
Reply #14 - Mar 22nd, 2016 at 1:42pm
Print Post  
i made the seater for a guy who is using a tang sight. and it still probably has too much off set. thought I would try it and if it doesn't work make another one.
  

if you think you have it figured out  then you just dont understand
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint