Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2]  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) tube sight holder (Read 13473 times)
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16278
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: tube sight holder
Reply #15 - Dec 9th, 2015 at 11:31am
Print Post  
oughtsix wrote on Dec 9th, 2015 at 10:53am:
OK Vall, now you are teasing me with that  Hepburn!


Yes, you need to put that sight on a Hepburn, and find a suitable front sight too! Lots of good useable front sights around that would work with it! Most of the old inexpensive scopes had a decent front sight that would work for you!
I think there may also be one or two more of these scopes in the bunch my friend is selling, but they had very crude mounts.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16278
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: tube sight holder
Reply #16 - Dec 14th, 2015 at 4:21pm
Print Post  
I think I ran across something that might help determine what your scope mount is! This is a picture of a Wm Malcolm scope mount from the 1800's on an old muzzleloader. The mount is different in it's attachment to the rifle, but looks to be the same on the upper part.
Pretty sure you have a Wm Malcolm rear scope mount!
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oughtsix
Global Moderator
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1282
Location: Columbus
Joined: May 31st, 2009
Re: tube sight holder
Reply #17 - Dec 14th, 2015 at 6:18pm
Print Post  
That knurled section looks very similar,  You might be onto something.
  

Life Member ASSRA, OGCA &  TSGC
I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters........ Frank Lloyd Wright
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16278
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: tube sight holder
Reply #18 - Dec 14th, 2015 at 7:57pm
Print Post  
I'm guessing it's Malcolm, and possibly different application, and maybe slightly newer? Not a lot of scopes or scope makers in that era to choose from.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16278
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: tube sight holder
Reply #19 - Dec 23rd, 2015 at 4:18pm
Print Post  
That's a very nifty front mount blindeye! Well worth holding onto, and hoping for a proper Malcolm rear!
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Chuckster
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2238
Location: Colorado
Joined: May 15th, 2008
Re: tube sight holder
Reply #20 - Dec 24th, 2015 at 9:48am
Print Post  
Blindeye,
Interesting mount. Have never seen the concave and convex ring idea used before, but would certainly prevent binding of the scope.
Chuck
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16278
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: tube sight holder
Reply #21 - Dec 24th, 2015 at 10:01am
Print Post  
The only question that comes to mind for me is tolerances of the parts on that front mount? If it's close enough to not have any play, then it will be tough to slip the scope tube into it, and not scar the finish. If it's loose enough to slip in easily, then tolerances will be loose, and accuracy will be affected. 
Would still be a great front mount to own and try, just to see how it worked!
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Send TopicPrint