Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Maynard question (Read 5546 times)
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 613
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Maynard question
Sep 14th, 2015 at 7:44pm
Print Post  
Is this buttstock original Maynard? I ask because I can't say I have seen this style crescent butt plate before on a Maynard.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Deadeye Bly
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1067
Location: Stephens City
Joined: Feb 25th, 2011
Re: Maynard question
Reply #1 - Sep 14th, 2015 at 8:48pm
Print Post  
It looks like a Stevens butt plate. Stevens bought out the assets of Mass Arms in the mid-1890's. Is it a factory job after Stevens bought them or a Stevens factory replacement or was it made that way by Mass Arms with a butt plate acquired from Stevens? I don't know. Mass Arms most likely did not make butt plates, they probably bought them and they would make almost anything a customer wanted within reason. Unfortunately we can't get a factory letter like on some other manufacturers so we'll never know.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1106
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Maynard question
Reply #2 - Sep 14th, 2015 at 9:22pm
Print Post  
I've been looking at that particular rifle on GunBroker too.  I think there are some other issues besides the buttplate.  For one, I don't think it is a "long range" as listed.  Not using a 40-40 cartridge.  But then, I'm far from being an expert on Maynards.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 613
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Maynard question
Reply #3 - Sep 14th, 2015 at 10:20pm
Print Post  
I agree George. The gun has the full round barrel like a long range but then only a 40-40. And nothing else makes sense. Strange.
I am wondering if it isn't a put together gun by Stevens from parts as Deadeye suggested.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Deadeye Bly
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1067
Location: Stephens City
Joined: Feb 25th, 2011
Re: Maynard question
Reply #4 - Sep 15th, 2015 at 7:44am
Print Post  
Those full round barrels weren't necessarily long range target barrels. The 1885 and 1890 catalogs list them in 26,28,30 and 32" lengths in calibers 40,44,45/70,50 and 55. Additionally I've got full round barrels in 32/35 and 35/40 calibers which were non-cataloged items.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16280
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Maynard question
Reply #5 - Sep 15th, 2015 at 10:16am
Print Post  
Wondering if the terminology is the only problem here? Whether it's a "longrange" or a custom build, it still appears to be original, and I'd assume from the age it's factory done? Does that really make it wrong, or just wrong to be called a "longrange" model?
In most cases the old factories didn't waste anything, and also had no issue with building to a customer's request. This could be a case of assembling factory parts to a customer order. Or it could be a case of using parts on hand to assemble a gun. Either way, I wouldn't call it wrong, just not what is usually expected to see in a certain model.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
graduated peep
Ex Member


Re: Maynard question
Reply #6 - Sep 15th, 2015 at 1:41pm
Print Post  
Not handling (or disassembling) many Maynards, I have to wonder if they did or didn't number match wood and metal parts ALA Marlin or Remington.
That would certainly tell the tale if this gun left the factory so equipped.
Has anyone asked the seller to check ???
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 613
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Maynard question
Reply #7 - Sep 15th, 2015 at 4:55pm
Print Post  
Marlinguy, I agree that the rifle has been in its current configuration for a very long time and possible since it left the factory. And it could be a special order as suggested. 

My only question was in regards to the buttplate. As I said I had never seen one like that before on a Maynard. The interesting info to me was the Stevens comments which make sense to me.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Deadeye Bly
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1067
Location: Stephens City
Joined: Feb 25th, 2011
Re: Maynard question
Reply #8 - Sep 15th, 2015 at 5:00pm
Print Post  
You are right marlinguy. Just because it is different doesn't make it wrong. The stock is well done and seems period to the rest of the rifle. It's one of those things with no documentation to prove or disprove it.

Maynard sporting rifles generally had the wood serial numbered to the frame under the lower tang. This could be checked on this rifle to see if it is numbered appropriately.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LRF
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 613
Location: MN
Joined: May 8th, 2010
Re: Maynard question
Reply #9 - Sep 19th, 2015 at 1:49pm
Print Post  
I was at the gunshow in Hutchinson Mn this morning and this gun was at the show.
It is definitely factory or at least been like it is for a very long time. The buttplate is by all means Stevens (at the show were 2 ea #44 Stevens and they all had the same plate), it was nickel plated and has worn a bit. The bore is quite shoot able but not mint. Nice old gun, very heavy barrel.
Thought you would want to know.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint