Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Smokeless loads - Shiloh (Read 22816 times)
ChrisB
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 26
Location: England
Joined: Sep 17th, 2014
Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Jul 10th, 2015 at 10:53am
Print Post  
I am curious, after reading all the posts about the Quigley "blow up", just how many Shiloh or C. Sharps owners use smokeless? Shiloh only recomend these loads for certain cals. where modern loaded rounds are available.Told me not to use smokeless in my 40-70SS. Guys have suggested H4198 (thats what I have, used it in my Pedersoli 45-70 years back). What is the deal. I am well aware of double thrown charges or too high a charge. Some suggestions have been around 22 gns H4198 and NO over powder wads.
Your thoughts please.
Thanks, Chris B  Cool
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #1 - Jul 10th, 2015 at 12:11pm
Print Post  
Chris 
I use about 18 Grains of 4227 with a wad placed .100" off the powder. It is a fairly mild load and shoots acurately. The wad off the powder does two things; first if the wad seater dosen't go all the way to the shoulder then I have put in too much powder. Second having it off the powder insures that I won't ring the barrel.

40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #2 - Jul 10th, 2015 at 3:07pm
Print Post  
Have you contacted Shilo (or C. Sharps or Pedersoli etc) to find out what the actual grade of barrel steel is that they are using for your 40-70 SS rifle?

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1109
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #3 - Jul 10th, 2015 at 4:09pm
Print Post  
After over 50 years of shooting black powder cartridge rifles, I am of the opinion that black powder cartridges are just that - - - black powder cartridges.  I've tried various smokless loads over the years, but they never worked as well as black powder.   If you want to shoot smokless powder, get a rifle chambered for a smokless powder round.  Shiloh offers the 30-40 Krag, 38-55, and 45-70 for which smokless powder ammunition is available.  If you read the fine print in their catelog and manuals (?what read?),  I think you will find a statment to the effect that their rifles are not warrented for smokless powder except for those chambings which are currently being loaded.  Well, at least their manuals used to say that.   

Aside from the dangers of double charges, what really soured me on smokless loads was their dismal performance in cold weather.  In that particular case I was using 3031 in a 45-70.  Shot really great in the summer and I had planned that as a hunting load.  Tried it at about 10'F and it gave 50 yard shotgun patterns.  Any safe loading of smokless in a black powder cartridge is operating at the bottom end of the pressure curve.  Lower the temperature, and you are not developing sufficient pressure for proper combustion.  Result, lousy accuracy.

If you insist on usng smokless powder, get a rifle chambered for a short case - -like the 40-50 or something like that.  If you want a smokless powder loading for the 40-70 SS, get yourself a suitable rifle chambered for the 405 Winchester.  A High Wall or Ruger comes to mind.

Keep your powder dry,
George
Salmon, Idaho
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ChrisB
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 26
Location: England
Joined: Sep 17th, 2014
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #4 - Jul 10th, 2015 at 5:29pm
Print Post  
Thanks all for your input. I do in fact use Swiss BP, not smokeless, but we pay OVER double what you guys in the US pay. You guys are very lucky not only with your gun laws but your gas/petrol is about 1/3 rd cheaper than here in the UK, not to mention just about everything else. I am looking to just go to my local range and enjoy shooting my Shiloh with black and to try some H4198 to use it up.
Cheers,
Chris  Cool
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gunlaker
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2350
Location: lower mainland, B.C.
Joined: Dec 13th, 2010
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #5 - Jul 10th, 2015 at 5:46pm
Print Post  
I only use smokeless in my Shiloh Sharps rifles, and am aware of what Shiloh's recommendations are.  But to add fuel to the fire, Kirk has said on multiple occasions that the Shiloh Sharps is as strong as a Ruger #1, so I don't think that the barrel, or action, are limited to black powder pressures. I know they advise against smokeless in the larger cases. 

Interestingly, in one of the older issues of SPG's magazine, there is mention of  Shiloh Sharps in .45-90 shooting a 250 on the German Ring target with smokeless!  I believe it has been repeated, so it's not a fluke.  I shoot a lot of black powder, and really enjoy it, but have never heard of anyone shooting 250's with it in a .45-90.

Chris.


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
.22-5-40
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 803
Joined: Feb 13th, 2010
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #6 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 1:37am
Print Post  
1++ what George Babits said!  While I was waiting for my Axtell 77' .40-2 1/2" (.40-70 str.) in the mid 90's, I had many phone conversations with Tom.  I asked if their rifles would be safe with sane smokeless loads..he replied "of course..I use it in them all the time".  At the time I was kind of soured on the then available Goex black and smokeless is all I have used in this rifle.  Got some wonderful small groups..but as George said..when the cool fall weather set in..I started experiencing click-bangs.  Few years back, I picked up a couple of original rifles, a .40-70 Remington rolling block..with English proofs, and a No.2 Ballard in .25-25 Stevens.  I had heard good things about a then new to me black powder called Swiss.  And since I had sense enough by that time to only use black in these antiques, I tried it.  1st. time out with the Remington, and 1 1/2 Swiss I shot a 1" group at 100yds...it ain't supposed to be that easy..and I was hooked.  The little .25-25 likes 3FG Swiss...3/8" groups at 50yds. with 100gr. Ideal 25720.  I must confess..I did try a light smokeless load in this rifle..and the accuracy wasn't there..and neither was the deep boom all out of proportion to it's size..and that greyish white smoke screen blotting out the target for an instant..it just wasn't as fun!  It's been awhile since I have shot the Axtell..but I think next time out it will be shooting Holy black!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Litl Red
Ex Member


Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #7 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 9:33am
Print Post  
Been shooting a couple of 40-65 for 20 some years now.  Got a 40-70SS some months back.    Shot them with black and smokeless, in good weather and cold both.

They've been chronographed a lot, often beside modern cartridges from 221 Fireball up to 45 caliber.    The 40-65 and 40-70SS haven't acted differently than the modern ones with smokeless when hot or cold.   And that's been proved by the chrono.    

Some smokeless is temp sensitive.  Some isn't.  Whatever the cartridge.   

I don't use powder that shows me any temperature sensitivity.  Shooting year round it isn't a real bright thing to do when shooting in bad weather happens mostly in matches.  

There are a number of smokeless powders that give excellent performance in originally black cartridges at original velocities.   Loading my 40s to black velocities is quite easy.   5744 has proven to be excellent at giving black velocity consistency as well.  Single digit SD is normal and usually slightly better than the black I've been able to find.   It's a double base powder which just may be the reason it gives such good and consistent ignition.   It fills the case more than half full, so double charges aren't in the picture.   I've also had good results using AA8700 which definitely fills the case more than half full.   And a couple others, but have stuck with 5744.  

Black wasn't sold around here within a couple hours drive except in on place, while Pyrodex and later some of the others were available at dozens of shops.   So I shot mostly subs when I wanted smoke.   Turned out getting original black velocity was easiest with 5744.   
    
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1109
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #8 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 9:40am
Print Post  
gunlaker wrote on Jul 10th, 2015 at 5:46pm:
I only use smokeless in my Shiloh Sharps rifles, and am aware of what Shiloh's recommendations are.  But to add fuel to the fire, Kirk has said on multiple occasions that the Shiloh Sharps is as strong as a Ruger #1, so I don't think that the barrel, or action, are limited to black powder pressures. I know they advise against smokeless in the larger cases. 


Back in the mid 1980's,  Wolfgange showed me a barreled action they had blown up on purpose with smokless powder.  If I remember right it was a 45-120.  I forget what the charge was, but it was pretty hefty. The barrel was clamped in a vice in front of the action and toutched off.  The barrel burst just past the jaws of the vice.  The action "held" but the receiver ring was severely bulged.  Someone shooting that rifle from the shoulder would have kept his forhead intack, but probably lost his hand.

Yes Chris, the strength is there with the Shiloh.  No question about that.  The problem lies with the LONG cases and SHORT powder charges.  Simply put, you are just asking for trouble.  That's why I said if you must insist on smokless, use a short case.  That way the powder charge comes closer to filling the case.  It isn't just the possibility of double charges either.  The longer the space between the powder and the base of the bullet, the more the bullet acts more like an obstruction than a projectile.   

I have never understood why someone would spend $3000 for a black powder rifle and then insist on shooting smokless powder in it.  It is kind of like filling up your deisel truck with gasoline.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TDW
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 118
Location: Montana and Missouri
Joined: Mar 21st, 2010
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #9 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 10:19am
Print Post  
George, 
That barrel and action kicked around the office for many years! If I recall correctly The barreled action was fired several times with compressed charges of IMR 3031, with no damage other than the primers disappearing out through the vent hole at the bottom of the breech block. The barreled action was then fired with the same load, but with two 500 grain bullets pounded into the bore with some spaces left between them. Several of these loads were fired with no damage to barrel or action. Finally the triple ball load was fired with the barrel chrushed .025 in a very heavy mill vise. That procedure produced the barreled action we remember. I have always wondered what H.P.White's would have estimated the pressure for THAT one  Shocked
   However... Like George stated, the large capacity case with a small smokeless powder charge (and some advice from the company legal dept.) was the reason for the cautionary warning.
Best regards,
Tom W.
  

"The farther North you go, the more things you will run into that will eat your horse."
S.P. Garbe, Absaroka-Beartooth Wilderness, 1980
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
gunlaker
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2350
Location: lower mainland, B.C.
Joined: Dec 13th, 2010
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #10 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 11:13am
Print Post  
George I agree with you in general.  I just wanted to show that there are a few people getting surprising accuracy with longer cases and smokeless.   

When I read about that 250 in SPG's magazine I was very surprised.  In an exchange of posts on the Shiloh forum there was a fellow that has shot two 250's on the German Ring target IIRC.  I was surprised to hear it as I'd always been lead to believe that black was more accurate in the big cases.

I haven't used smokeless in any of the big original cases, but it sure works well in the .32-40 I must say Smiley

Other than schuetzen rifles, where I do shoot some smokeless, my primary interest is silhouette and BPTR and smokeless is not useful in those games anyway.

Chris.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1109
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #11 - Jul 11th, 2015 at 9:27pm
Print Post  
Sure, you can get good accuracy with smokless powder sometimes, even with the long cartridges.  I wouldn't question that.  But, why bother.  If you want to shoot smokeless powder, get your rifle chambered for a short case and avoid all the inherrent problems of short charges in long cases.  Might save you a block through your forehead; or a ruined hand.  I'd rather clean my 40-70SS a thousand times than loose the use of my left hand.

I don't know what the pressures were with the intentionally "blown" Shiloh I mentioned earlier.  They had to have been pretty darn high.  Wolfgange Droege told me that the only real product liability insurance was to build an indistructable rifle.  He also told me what the A.P. White labs had successfully tested the Shiloh to, but I will honor my promise to him tothat I would  never reveal it.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #12 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 10:02am
Print Post  
The reason I bother is because I have never been able to build a black powder load that would shoot more accurately than a good smokeless load. How many 250s have been shot with black? How many with smokeless. 
If shooters would take the time to learn what their doing instead of learning about reloading while smoking cigarettes behind the outhouse we would have a lot fewer accidents. 
Secondly procedures can be developed that can stop the double charging of cases. The double charging of cases is by a large margin poor loading technique and / or laziness. 
Apparently the guy who blew up the barrel on this Sharps through either ignorance or stupidity continued to abuse a rifle he had already damaged through shoddy loading practices and ignorance of his components. 
It’s this kind of preventable accident that will close a great event. Every shooter should report unsafe practices and or shooting immediately. The life you save may be your own. God watches out for fools and children but not innocent bystanders.

40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
calledflyer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3598
Joined: Mar 9th, 2015
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #13 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 1:58pm
Print Post  
Bravo, 40-Rod!! Can't be too safe, in this and other things as well.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1109
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Smokeless loads - Shiloh
Reply #14 - Jul 12th, 2015 at 5:36pm
Print Post  
My goal is more to work with original type loads and see what I can do with them.  My eyes aren't all that great anymore, although I have yet to have a scoped rifle for my shooting.  My rifles are more or less "hunting rifles" although some do have target sights on them.  If I can get a 4" offhand group at 100 yards, I'm tickled pink; especially if I do it with a 150 year old rifle and black powder ammunition.  I have several rifles chambered for smokless powder cartridges and I shoot them when I am feeling too lazy to clean rifle and brass.  That keeps it simple and safe.

As for smokless powder loads in the long black powder cases.  Look at your pressures, not velocities,  in comparison to black powder pressures.  If you hammer something long enough it is going to break.  The harder you hammer it, the sooner it will break.      

If you are using smokless powder in a long black powder cartridge, please let me know and I'll move to the opposite end of the range, or pack it up for the day.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Send TopicPrint