ASSRA Forum - Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA

ASSRA Forum › General › Reloading the Single Shot Rifle › Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA

(Moderator Group: Moderator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Page Index Toggle

Pages: 1

Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies)

Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA (Read 6317 times)

Pentz Senior Forum Member Offline Funf und Zwanzig mit den Hut Posts: 435 Location: Vancouver, WA Joined: Sep 4^th, 2014	Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Apr 7^th, 2015 at 3:54pm	Print Post
	I did a search but am confused/concerned about the seating depths of cork and floral foam wads. I've used cork wads 1/8" thick; they are a bit of a pain to seat. Next to try will be the floral foam; I've sliced it nicely into sheets .2" thick with my Wustof santuko (love that blade) and have sealed my case mouths with ease. Now I worry about whether to leave them at the case mouth or seat them down close to the powder. It would seem that the inconsequential matter in the very friable floral foam would not cause a potential chamber ringing in my heavy barrel, but this cartridge is still very new to me. Thoughts/warnings/experiences? Thanks...

	ASSRA Member Yoostabe # 11497
	IP Logged

frnkeore Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 7619 Location: Central Point, OR 97502 Joined: Jun 16^th, 2010	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #1 - Apr 7^th, 2015 at 4:08pm	Print Post
	I don't seat anything below the case mouth and don't ever use a wad unless I absolutely have to, to avoid spilling powder when loading the case in the chamber. With a STS scope, I can even load the 32/20 w/o a wad in a HW. And I've been loading my 33 ELCO Max case in my Borchardt for years w/o a wad. Oh............ I forgot to say, "I DON'T like wads" Frank

	ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
	YIM AIM IP Logged

40_Rod Frequent Elocutionist Offline Extremism in the persuit of accuracy is not a vice Posts: 4285 Location: Knoxville, TN Joined: Apr 20^th, 2004	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #2 - Apr 7^th, 2015 at 4:51pm	Print Post
	As far as wads go you are going to find 2 camps those that swear by wads and those that swear at them. I am one who uses wads and have used them successfully for many years. I use cork or in some cases felt I like to use natural materials for my wads. This is the method that I learned from Charlie Dell. Get your starting powder charge and put it in a case tap the case to settle the powder now push a wad down on to the powder and measure the depth to the top of the wad. Subtract .100” and set your wad seater at this point it doesn’t have to be anything fancy for a .32 cal you can use a 5/16”-18 screw and two nuts to lock in place. Drop your powder charge seat your wad now tip your case mouth down. Now take the case and put it in the chamber and fire. When you finally get a charge that you are happy with make up a permanent seater that keeps the wad off the powder between .050” and .100 off the powder and don’t forget to orient the powder against the wad. 40 Rod


	IP Logged

bpjack Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 3737 Location: East Olympia, WA Joined: May 18^th, 2008	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #3 - Apr 7^th, 2015 at 4:54pm	Print Post
	Frank I totally agree. I guess I am an antiwadite! I have tried floral foam wads and they are too messy. Whenever shooters at my home range wander over to see what the heck I am doing with a powder measure and a rifle with a 'sniper' scope they will ask how I keep the powder in the case. I say "very carefully". I never have had it spill into an action. Jack

	ASSRA # 11318 Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.
	IP Logged

frnkeore Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 7619 Location: Central Point, OR 97502 Joined: Jun 16^th, 2010	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #4 - Apr 7^th, 2015 at 5:17pm	Print Post
	Jack, I have to say that I haven't always been against wads. I did use them, quite successfully in grade school. I did get a 250 with them, too......... 250 swats with a paddle, that is Frank

	ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
	YIM AIM IP Logged

RayH Oldtimer Offline Posts: 756 Location: Oldest City, FL Joined: Jan 4^th, 2012	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #5 - Apr 7^th, 2015 at 8:45pm	Print Post
	Pentz - Personal experience only ................. I have found it not possible to insert a wad into a case mouth of a given diameter and expect it to hold its position when seated to a depth of a greater diameter. The .32-20CPA is a bottle neck case, is it not?

	In GOD We Trust
	IP Logged

JackHughs Oldtimer Offline Posts: 657 Location: Riverbank Joined: Sep 27^th, 2008	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #6 - Apr 7^th, 2015 at 10:21pm	Print Post
	Hi, You may want to consider Schuetzendave's pipe insulation wads. I didn't use them in .32-20 CPA but they work well in .32 RKS. JackHughs

	The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity. W.B. Yeats
	IP Logged

Pentz Senior Forum Member Offline Funf und Zwanzig mit den Hut Posts: 435 Location: Vancouver, WA Joined: Sep 4^th, 2014	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #7 - Apr 7^th, 2015 at 10:32pm	Print Post
	The 32-20 CPA is blown out to a straight-walled case; the cork worked well but was difficult to cut unless the case mouth was sharpened. The foam is much easier albeit a bit crumbly. I'll seat them down to .10 off the powder. I attended a 1-room schoolhouse as a child and had the same teacher for all 8 years. No swats, but spent many hours at recess and lunch writing "I will not......" a thousand times a go.

	ASSRA Member Yoostabe # 11497
	IP Logged

40_Rod Frequent Elocutionist Offline Extremism in the persuit of accuracy is not a vice Posts: 4285 Location: Knoxville, TN Joined: Apr 20^th, 2004	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #8 - Apr 8^th, 2015 at 10:07am	Print Post
	I looked up my reamer print for the 32-20 CPA It shows a .007 difference between the body diameter and the neck diameter. So yes there is a .0035” per side bottleneck. If we assume that the wall thickness is the same in at the top of the body and the neck a inside diameter of .322” will only open up to .329”. I measured one of the wads that I punched out with my Cornell wad punch and they measure .333” that should be enough to keep them in place. However if that doesn’t work you can use a .33 cal wad in the case mouth. 40 Rod


	IP Logged

Schuetzendave Frequent Elocutionist Offline Retired Ex-Shooter Posts: 4227 Location: St. Albert, Alberta Joined: Jan 28^th, 2005	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #9 - Apr 8^th, 2015 at 10:43am	Print Post
	I cut my .32 wads with a .38 diameter wad cutter. That way the pipe insulation wads are slightly compressed and holds firm in the case mouth. I have seen a ringed RKS stainless steel barrel from a shooter who put floral foam wads directly down on the powder.


	IP Logged

marlinguy Frequent Elocutionist Offline Ballards may be weaker, but they sure are neater! Posts: 17967 Location: Oregon Joined: Feb 2^nd, 2009	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #10 - Apr 8^th, 2015 at 10:58am	Print Post
	In their book, "The Modern Schuetzen Rifle" Wayne Schwartz and Charlie Dell comment on wads. I chuckled when I saw Wayne's comment, which was one line; "I do not use wads, so can't comment on them." Charlie on the other hand goes on for numerous pages talking about wads, and his experiences with them; plus other's comments on wads. I liked what both of them said about wads.

	(You need to *Login* or *Register* to view media files and links)
	IP Logged

rkaires Frequent Elocutionist Offline No Stronger Bond Posts: 1671 Location: Dingmans Ferry, PA Joined: Oct 26^th, 2012	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #11 - Apr 9^th, 2015 at 9:33am	Print Post
	My experience with wads in the .32-20CPA is with floral foam and pipe foam insulation. I started out with 1/4" thick floral foam as recommended by CPA with decent results. After reading information on what Charlie Dell and others have said regarding chamber ringing I decided to look into alternatives. Schuetzendave has been using pipe foam insulation for some time now with excellent results so I gave them a try. I just push the wads in so they are even with the top of the case mouth. They worked very well for me using the same powder charges that worked with floral foam seated on the powder. The wads just fly out of the muzzle intact. I now use pipe foam insulation in my .32-20CPA, 22WCF and .40-50SS. Bob

	ASSRA #11031 NRA Life Proud Noodlehead "Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading."~ ~ Thomas Jefferson
	IP Logged

Myers Senior Forum Member Offline Posts: 388 Joined: Mar 5^th, 2013	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #12 - Apr 12^th, 2015 at 5:40pm	Print Post
	Schuetzendave wrote on Apr 8^th, 2015 at 10:43am: I cut my .32 wads with a .38 diameter wad cutter. That way the pipe insulation wads are slightly compressed and holds firm in the case mouth. I have seen a ringed RKS stainless steel barrel from a shooter who put floral foam wads directly down on the powder. You witnessed personally? How can a wet floral foam wad ring a barrel. It turns onto dust. Maybe the guy was using the dry floral foam?


	IP Logged

JLouis Frequent Elocutionist Offline Posts: 10625 Joined: Apr 8^th, 2009	Re: Seating depth of wads in the 32-20 CPA Reply #13 - Apr 12^th, 2015 at 6:32pm	Print Post
	I think down hard on the powder were the key words and the culprit and not the choice of the floral material. Both the wet and dry turn into an ash when ignited on the end of a tooth pick and I have used both without incident but they were not placed hard down on the powder as 40 Rod has pointed out on several occasions based on Charlie Dells findings.

	" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
	IP Logged

Page Index Toggle

Pages: 1

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Board Index ‹ Board Top

Top

ASSRA Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid XHTML

Valid CSS

Powered by Perl

Source Forge

Page completed in 0.9753 seconds.