Quote:I'm not a chemist, engineer, ballistician, gunsmith or personal injury lawyer; my opinions are just... opinion.
Hank's simple question didn't seem irrelevant to me. A honest inquiry here ought to deserve a attempt at a - - - - - - - - -
I would respectfully disagree with your conclusions for the following reasons.
1) Every inquiry presented does not warrant a response, simply because the question is asked.
2) Wanting to appear knowledgeable to the readership should never be the sole ground for responding to an inquiry that is presented.
3) Wanting to increase one's posting count should never be the sole ground for responding to an inquiry that is presented.
4) Sometimes the response to an inquiry is best couched by an admission that "one does not know the information sought."
5) Sometimes the response to an inquiry is best referred to a more learned or higher authority.
6) Sometime the response to an inquiry has to include an admonition for the benefit and/or safety of the inquirer and others who may apply the information provided to their determent.
7) Sometimes the response to an inquiry has to be a respectful decline to provide a response without a reason given, should the responder determines that the reason will serve no value or purpose to the inquirer.
8) Sometime a parent has to say to little Johnny, "NO, you must not do that" because little Johnny doesn't have the maturity to know that what he wants to do present a clear and present danger to his safety and well being.
Regards,
Creedmoormatch