Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Ammo no longer in production (Read 22685 times)
fredd3039
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 25
Joined: Dec 18th, 2010
Ammo no longer in production
Jul 25th, 2014 at 9:04am
Print Post  
I was speaking with my friend Colin Stolzer last night and we were discussing making reproduction actions without an FFL. As long as they are from a pre 1898 patent and the ammunition is no longer produced or available for sale in the US you can make the actions. I was wondering if anyone knows of a good refrence to old, outdated, rare, odd, and/or obscure amunition. It seems to me that I saw a book or two on the subject once but cant find anything now. Any Ideas?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RobertS
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 43
Location: Jackson TN
Joined: Apr 27th, 2006
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #1 - Jul 25th, 2014 at 9:41am
Print Post  
A book called Cartridges of the World is the first reference that comes to mind regarding obsolete ammunition, but others may suggest a better one.  Of course, it is a great resource for all ammo, whether still in production or not.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
George Babits
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1144
Joined: Sep 27th, 2012
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #2 - Jul 25th, 2014 at 9:11pm
Print Post  
Actually, it is my understanding that you can build rifles from scratch without a license as long as the production is less than 50 per year.  If I was interested in making actions (or rifles) I would go through the BATF regulations with a fine tooth comb instead of relying on hearsay from anyone on the internet.

George
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #3 - Jul 25th, 2014 at 9:35pm
Print Post  
George Babits wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 9:11pm:
Actually, it is my understanding that you can build rifles from scratch without a license as long as the production is less than 50 per year.  If I was interested in making actions (or rifles) I would go through the BATF regulations with a fine tooth comb instead of relying on hearsay from anyone on the internet.

George



Maybe that too, but I think the key factor is that you must not be building them for sale or to give away.  Personal use only.  And there's no restriction on age.  Which is why 80% receivers for AR-15 are so popular.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 17976
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #4 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 9:06am
Print Post  
uscra112 wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 9:35pm:
George Babits wrote on Jul 25th, 2014 at 9:11pm:
Actually, it is my understanding that you can build rifles from scratch without a license as long as the production is less than 50 per year.  If I was interested in making actions (or rifles) I would go through the BATF regulations with a fine tooth comb instead of relying on hearsay from anyone on the internet.

George



Maybe that too, but I think the key factor is that you must not be building them for sale or to give away.  Personal use only.  And there's no restriction on age.  Which is why 80% receivers for AR-15 are so popular.


Yes, and I think they can be eventually sold, but there's a time limit to prevent circumventing the law.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fredd3039
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 25
Joined: Dec 18th, 2010
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #5 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 9:12am
Print Post  
Receivers for sale. Not for personal use.
Colin Stolzer is not just someone on the internet. Look up STolzer and Sons Gunsmithing.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
QuestionableMaynard8130
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4144
Location: Benton  Harbor MI
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #6 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 10:29am
Print Post  
I'd suspect that making and selling actions alone. would trigger the BATF regulations since the barrel and chamber for the cartridge are an "add-on" to the action unless you were perhaps making a "pin fire" or "needle-rifle" action. or something else that is so obsolete that the the ammo is not available and the action mechanism could not be converted to a modern cartridge.

I'd suggest contacting Steve Earle, since he is producing limited numbers of beautifully finished actions-only for several old single shot rifles from the BP and transitional era.

Another avenue of exploration is the idea of n action "kit"   several have done that in the past, though most were basic castings.   I imagine that there is some sort of legal definition of the break point between a "kit" and a complete action
  

sacred cows make the best burger
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Chuckster
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2308
Location: Colorado
Joined: May 15th, 2008
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #7 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 11:11am
Print Post  
QM has some good words. The key is "intent to sell" which requires a manufacturers license. Think the 50 or less applies to the 11% federal tax on all firearms and ammunition. Would have a long talk with BTAF before making any fixed ammunition firearm for sale.  
Chuck
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fredd3039
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 25
Joined: Dec 18th, 2010
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #8 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 7:57pm
Print Post  
Lets forget about the whole manufacturing or making receivers. The point of this thread was obsolete ammunition references. Anyone know of any good references for obsolete cartridges????
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
QuestionableMaynard8130
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4144
Location: Benton  Harbor MI
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #9 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 8:40pm
Print Post  
"Cartridges of the World" was mentioned earlier.
  I also find Donnelly's "Handloader's Manual of Cartridge Conversions" quite useful since it specializes in methods to recreate obsolete hard to find and obsolete cartridges.  It also has measured drawings of the cases.

There is also a Cartridge Collectors Association which covers a lot of stuff including rare and little known obsolete cartridges.  I believe they publish a quarterly or semi-annual magazine for their members.  I believe the ASSRA Archives has a pretty good batch of them.
  

sacred cows make the best burger
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #10 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 8:45pm
Print Post  
fredd3090,

You might see if you can find the various volumes of "The History and Development of Small Arms Ammunition" by George A Hoyem.

Then you should probably check with various sources like Buffalo Arms in Idaho to see which "obsolete" cartridges have been re-introduced, and are available for purchase once again.

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2996
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #11 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 8:53pm
Print Post  
"Cartridges of the World" is a good starting point.  But the publishers have been milking it for a long time, putting out new editions without making any effort to make improvements on errors & omissions in the previous editions.  IMHO, the earliest editions when Frank Barnes was involved are the best ones.  Keep in mind that many of the dimensions for obsolete cartridges are taken from specimens and that there was a great deal of variation.

There are a great many "obsolete" cartridges of all sorts; military (US & foreign), US sporting, British, & European.  Deciding on a general category narrows the field.  There are 2 editions of "The Handloader's Manual of Cartridge Conversions" by John J. Donnelly and an earlier volume of the same sort by George Nonte.  Some of Donnelly's techniques seem to be excessively complicated & costly.  Specifically, I have found much easier& cheaper ways to make the Siamese, Guedes-Castro, and Kropatschek cartridges.  

If you are looking for "loading & shooting" information, try Phil Sharpe's "Complete Guide to Handloading" (1937 or 1941) and Ken Waters' "Pet Loads".  If you do not find it there, it is pretty odd. Sharpe's book is available on line & free.  

There are other recent specialist trade paperbacks that have "Old West" or "Buffalo Rifles" or "Black Powder Military" as keywords in their titles.

The advent of CNC & other machinery that appears to be affordable by small-scale enterprises has made obsolete & obscure cases available.  You will find many references to .22-20 Single Shot cases made by Jamison. RMC is the best source for 28-30 Stevens.  They also made me some 450 Boxer-Henry Long cases
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ireload2
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 169
Joined: Jul 9th, 2009
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #12 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 9:04pm
Print Post  
You cannot depend on obsolete ammo.
If you fish around you can find people that offer almost any cartridge for sale.

The patent date means nothing. It is not recognized at all. New Winchester 1885 Highwalls are treated like modern manufacture. New 1874 Sharps are treated like modern rifles. 

If you put a solid bar stock barrel on one it would still be considered a modern rifle.


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ron
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 576
Location: Augusta Maine
Joined: Nov 15th, 2009
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #13 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 9:14pm
Print Post  
Have you tried Ammo Encyclopedia published by Blue Book I have found it very helpful. It has sections on BP and obsolete cartridges.

ron
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fredd3039
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 25
Joined: Dec 18th, 2010
Re: Ammo no longer in production
Reply #14 - Jul 26th, 2014 at 10:26pm
Print Post  
For god sakes read this:

Colin,
Do you have a class II Manufacturing License? If so, do you have to pay that State Dept. TAX that other manufacturers have to pay?

Frank,
 
I don’t even have an FFL. Everything I build or work on is pre-1898, so it’s all exempt from GCA and ITAR and I never get anywhere close to 50 guns a year so no excise tax either.
 
Colin

So if you build a new action but it is an action patented before 1898 you dont have to have an FFL. You are shitting me! 
Frank

Frank,
 
As long as it meet the 27CFR exemptions being both pre-1898 action and also chamber in a non-commercially available ammo.
 
27 CFR:
" Antique firearm. (a) Any firearm (including any firearm with a
matchlock, flintlock, percussion cap, or similar type of ignition
system) manufactured in or before 1898; and (b) any replica of any
firearm described in paragraph (a) of this definition if such replica
(1) is not designed or redesigned for using rimfire or conventional
centerfire fixed ammunition, or (2) uses rimfire or conventional
centerfire fixed ammunition which is no longer manufactured in the
United States and which is not readily available in the ordinary
channels of commercial trade."
 
Stay within the pre-1898 exemption and you can manufacture all kinds of nice rifles and pistols in some fun calibers.
The first couple years after I finished my apprenticeship I had an FFL and built custom bolt action sporting rifles but I got tired of the constantly changing rules the BATFE makes you play by and the fact that hundreds of guys build custom sporters(stiff competition from guys who had been doing it a lot longer than me). Now days I don’t have any BATFE paperwork and very few guys build the stuff I’ve built for the last ten years(small niche of the market with less competition but better pay days).
 
Kindest Regards,
 
Colin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Send TopicPrint