Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Dating Stevens Model 44 (Read 103073 times)
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16104
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #30 - Jun 10th, 2014 at 6:47pm
Print Post  
I have Stevens Walnut Hill 44 frame, in .22LR, with 32" #3 weight half octagon barrel, engraved and DST, 6 o'clock firing pin. Pretty close to Frank's in #18137.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
oneatatime
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3871
Location: Rocky Mountains
Joined: Oct 30th, 2011
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #31 - Jun 10th, 2014 at 8:43pm
Print Post  
Interesting. I was just looking at the 1912 catalog. By then the Walnut Hill was on a 44 1/2 action and SSTs and DSTs were no longer available for 44s. Barrels were available up to 34 inches and in .25 or larger you could get a smokeless powder barrel for $3 extra and in No 2 or 3 weight only, a nickel steel barrel for $6 extra. Wonder if these barrels were marked differently?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
digitall423
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 744
Location: Calhoun, TN
Joined: Aug 5th, 2005
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #32 - Jun 11th, 2014 at 7:14am
Print Post  
My small frame side plate has a serial number of 2661. That is the only number to be found. it is stamped on the front of the action hidden by the fore arm. it is stamped on both the frame and the side plate.
Bill
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #33 - Jun 11th, 2014 at 8:09pm
Print Post  
Are you looking for sideplate info? Large frame or small frame or both?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16104
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #34 - Jun 12th, 2014 at 11:53am
Print Post  
I think when one is accumulating serial number info on a maker who's records are gone, you need to be careful. Some general things will hold true, and often can come to some "general"" conclusions that apply to most guns. But like many of the old gun makers, Stevens continued to assemble some 44 frames after the catalog dropped that model. They didn't just melt down all those 44 parts once they stopped cataloging the model.
You'll also find an occasional gun with odd features for the serial number range, as it was not uncommon for a gun maker to find parts in a corner of the factory and assemble them into later guns. The idea back then was to make money, and tossing new old parts was taboo if they could be incorporated into use and save money.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2835
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #35 - Jun 12th, 2014 at 6:45pm
Print Post  
Texasmac posted a reference that led to a Model 47 with a SN of 26140, which the seller claimed was made in 1910.  Any ideas as to why the seller was certain the year was 1910?  WAG?  My guess would be a few years earlier.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #36 - Jun 13th, 2014 at 7:00am
Print Post  
waterman wrote on Jun 12th, 2014 at 6:45pm:
Texasmac posted a reference that led to a Model 47 with a SN of 26140, which the seller claimed was made in 1910.  Any ideas as to why the seller was certain the year was 1910?  WAG?  My guess would be a few years earlier.


I'd only accept that claim if there was an original sales receipt.  From what we've accumulated so far the seller can't be proven wrong, but nothing so far is even remotely like proof that he's right.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #37 - Jun 16th, 2014 at 1:39am
Print Post  
I have my spreadsheet assembled.  About 40 listed so far. If anyone wants a copy, P/M me with a direct email address, (or tell me how to do attachments using the forum email).

BTW I turned up one for sale last night that does have what is claimed to be the original sales receipt, dated 1899.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Rick Fischer
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 24
Joined: Jun 5th, 2014
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #38 - Jun 17th, 2014 at 5:41am
Print Post  
The attached picture shows the mainspring on my 46xxx Model 44.  Wisner's has two mainsprings listed.  Early, no hole, same as 1889 Favorite, and Intermediate, screw hole, same as 1894 Favorite.  My spring has no hole.

I'm not familiar with Favorites.  Is the 1889 and 1894 a year, or model number, or?

Is that arrangement on my gun original?  It seems to work, but it isn't the way I would design a gun.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #39 - Jun 17th, 2014 at 6:20am
Print Post  
Yes, so far as I know that's original.  None of mine have a spring with a hole, and that includes my 1894 Model 108.

Favorite model numbers are two digits, 17, 18, 20 for the smoothbore version, etc.    Those 4 digit numbers that are so often referredeto are dates of introduction for new versions.  As I get it, there are 1889s, then 1894, then 1915.   I saw and passed up what I now think was an 1889 at a gun show in April.  Shoulda bought it, even though it was a wreck.  

I know little about Favorites, since I'm much more interested in the Model 12 and Model 101 in the boy's rifle category. 
« Last Edit: Jun 17th, 2014 at 6:27am by uscra112 »  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #40 - Jun 17th, 2014 at 3:36pm
Print Post  
Gee, I've been letting the side down here.  Failing to pick up the barrel stamping break at 1916, when the "J.Stevens A&T"  name was changed by Westinghouse to "J.Stevens Arms".    Now I've gotta go back and look at 50 or so For Sale listings to see what that tells us.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Rick Fischer
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 24
Joined: Jun 5th, 2014
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #41 - Jun 25th, 2014 at 7:56am
Print Post  
Dont know if this data is of any value, but there were three Model 44 barrels on ebay (i missed out on the good one!!).
1.  s/n 15632, J Stevens A & T...APR 17 94, .25 RF.
2.  s/n 26088, J Stevens A & T...APR 17 94, 22 LR.
3.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Rick Fischer
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 24
Joined: Jun 5th, 2014
Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #42 - Jun 25th, 2014 at 7:58am
Print Post  
Dang, just found the hot key for send!!

3.  33296, J Stevens A & T....APR 17 94, 22 LR.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
creedmoormatch
Ex Member


Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #43 - Jun 26th, 2014 at 6:18pm
Print Post  
Quote:

Is that arrangement on my gun original? 


Rick-- 
       Your illustrated main spring is correctly configured (shaped) and correctly positioned in the action, but may not be an original O.E.M. part.  In order to opine that the spring is original O.E.M. J. Stevens, I would need to hold the spring in my hand for 20 seconds.

If it works the action, is that not enough ?

No one knows for certain when your Model 44 was made, so be accepting of that fact.  Unless you locate and consult with a clairvoyant.

C.M.M.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
creedmoormatch
Ex Member


Re: Dating Stevens Model 44
Reply #44 - Jun 26th, 2014 at 6:43pm
Print Post  
Quote:
All of the factory records were burned by Westinghouse right after WW1, to avoid having them become evidence a Congressional inquiry.  

Phil W.


Hi Phil -- 
          I certainly appreciate that you wish to help this person with his question/s.  At the same time, permit me to offer one addendum to your information.  That being the fact that it was never proven by the available direct evidence that Westinghouse Corporation personnel ever destroyed business records belonging to the J. Stevens A. & T.Co. in order to impede the work of the U.S. Congress.

However, I would hasten to add that some such allegations were alleged by certain individuals.

C.M.M.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13
Send TopicPrint