Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Short Rifle cartridges (Read 10232 times)
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3020
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Short Rifle cartridges
Apr 28th, 2014 at 8:48pm
Print Post  
Can anyone supply any details?  Short Rifle cartridges were also reported to have been made in the UK before the 1914-1918 War.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
.22-5-40
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 828
Joined: Feb 13th, 2010
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #1 - Apr 29th, 2014 at 12:37am
Print Post  
The little .22 short cartridge is the oldest metallic cartridge still being loaded..1857 was it's birthdate.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3020
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #2 - Apr 29th, 2014 at 2:34am
Print Post  
This is a Short RIFLE cartridge, with, presumably, a 40 grain bullet.  The 40 grain bullet will not normally be stabilized in a rifled barrel with a twist normally associated with normal 29 to 33 grain bullets.  In "Small Bore Rifle Shooting" (1927), E.C. Crossman mentions the cartridge as being loaded in the UK and used for smallbore competition  "before the War".  

Other boxes of Shorts from the same time period (1897 to about 1920) are not listed as Short RIFLE cartridges.
« Last Edit: Apr 29th, 2014 at 2:40am by waterman »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
notlwonk
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 168
Location: Coventry CT
Joined: Dec 18th, 2006
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #3 - Apr 29th, 2014 at 5:23pm
Print Post  
You could measure the height of the box and get an idea of which bullet weight it is. Or  accurately weigh the box and compare to known samples. 
You may already know of this site, but I'll post the link anyway.
  (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3020
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #4 - Apr 29th, 2014 at 6:52pm
Print Post  
Thanks, notlwonk

I had not seen that link.  Or the marvelous links it led to.  I will have to wait until I have a couple of backup sets of ink cartridges & a ream of good paper before I print out those PDF catalogs.

I don't have the boxes, only the photos, and nothing for scale, so cannot really measure them.

What I learned is that the boxes date from the early to mid 1920s.  Collectors call them 'multi-color' boxes.  Still do not know why the reference to "RIFLE" cartridges.  Ned Crossman included catalog excerpts in his 1927 book and these boxes would have been in common circulation when Crossman was writing.  My guess is that the RIFLE reference was related to marketing and not to the presence of a 40-grain bullet.

FWIW, 22 LR cartridges are easily chambered in a Winchester Winder Musket without any alteration of the 22 Short chamber.  I have 3 chambered for Shorts, have fired LRs in all 3 many times without any risk.  Accuracy at 25 yards is (at best) minute of beer can.  At 50 yards, mostly you can hit a 10-quart pail.  At 100 yards, you might hit a 5-gallon bucket.

I will not try that with a fine Stevens or other target-grade rifle chambered in Short with a Pope or similar barrel.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #5 - Apr 29th, 2014 at 8:52pm
Print Post  
The long rifle chambering in a short marked barrel has been discussed here in the past. My Winder and most of my Stevens marked short will chamber long rifles. I have a Colt Derringer chambered in short made in the 1960's that will also chamber a long rifle if you force the issue. Won't fire them in it because they are mostly pot metal.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1855
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #6 - Jan 25th, 2015 at 5:36pm
Print Post  
Waterman
Read your latest article on testing the .22 shorts in the Journal.  I was really surprised at the velocity differences that you found in the two ammunitions that you tested. (CCI's and Lapua) The SD's were pretty wild too.  Do you think it's because companies don't care about quality today or were the semi-smokeless powders that good.  Have you ever chronographed some of the Target LR versions?  Are their velocities just as mixed?  Bob
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Aonghas
Ex Member


Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #7 - Jan 26th, 2015 at 9:24am
Print Post  
waterman wrote on Apr 29th, 2014 at 2:34am:
This is a Short RIFLE cartridge, with, presumably, a 40 grain bullet.  The 40 grain bullet will not normally be stabilized in a rifled barrel with a twist normally associated with normal 29 to 33 grain bullets.  In "Small Bore Rifle Shooting" (1927), E.C. Crossman mentions the cartridge as being loaded in the UK and used for smallbore competition  "before the War".  

Other boxes of Shorts from the same time period (1897 to about 1920) are not listed as Short RIFLE cartridges.


·22" 'Short' (never heard it referred to as Rifle, Short or Short Rifle) are still produced, as are BB, CB and 'Fairground' rounds, but, the 'Short' and the CB are best used in a rifle intended for same.

It is inadvisable to use them in anything intended to take ·22" Long Rifle as the chamber will be slightly burnt and may result in spent ·22" LR cases jamming when you try to extract them, eventually.

I have a Browning semi-auto in ·22" Short, and this is very definitely post-WWII.

BB is charged with just the primer in the rim and no other load, firing (spherical) ball, and can either come as BBC (bulleted breech cap) or with a CB case, very similar to ·22" Short. CB has a lighter than Short bullet, and a lighter powder load than ·22" short. I have ballistic data somewhere if you need it.

(I specify 'spherical ball' because ammo manufacturers call all solid bullets 'ball'.)

--
Aonghas
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Aonghas
Ex Member


Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #8 - Jan 26th, 2015 at 9:33am
Print Post  
waterman wrote on Apr 29th, 2014 at 6:52pm:
Thanks, notlwonk

/snip/

I don't have the boxes, only the photos, and nothing for scale, so cannot really measure them.

What I learned is that the boxes date from the early to mid 1920s.  Collectors call them 'multi-color' boxes.  Still do not know why the reference to "RIFLE" cartridges.  Ned Crossman included catalog excerpts in his 1927 book and these boxes would have been in common circulation when Crossman was writing.  My guess is that the RIFLE reference was related to marketing and not to the presence of a 40-grain bullet.

FWIW, 22 LR cartridges are easily chambered in a Winchester Winder Musket without any alteration of the 22 Short chamber.  I have 3 chambered for Shorts, have fired LRs in all 3 many times without any risk.  Accuracy at 25 yards is (at best) minute of beer can.  At 50 yards, mostly you can hit a 10-quart pail.  At 100 yards, you might hit a 5-gallon bucket.


I had a load of Lesmok boxes, from pre-WWII a while ago. They were less-smoke, but not by a lot when compared with black powder. Most of these old ·22" rounds are very corrosive (if they fire...) and I really would advise folk to keep them as curios rather than use them.

The Winchester Winder Musket is smoothbore, isn't it? This would explain the muckspreading.

--
Aonghas
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Aonghas
Ex Member


Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #9 - Jan 26th, 2015 at 9:39am
Print Post  
Old-Win wrote on Jan 25th, 2015 at 5:36pm:
Waterman
Read your latest article on testing the .22 shorts in the Journal.  I was really surprised at the velocity differences that you found in the two ammunitions that you tested. (CCI's and Lapua) The SD's were pretty wild too.  Do you think it's because companies don't care about quality today or were the semi-smokeless powders that good.  Have you ever chronographed some of the Target LR versions?  Are their velocities just as mixed?  Bob


·22" LR are very variable - some are subsonic while others are well supersonic. It pays to keep to the one that you know unless there is a good reason for changing (like I prefer Winchester subsonic hollowpoint for rabbits, etc, but would use a Stinger on a long-shot at a hare)

--
Aonghas
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #10 - Jan 26th, 2015 at 5:20pm
Print Post  
waterman wrote on Apr 29th, 2014 at 6:52pm:
... FWIW, 22 LR cartridges are easily chambered in a Winchester Winder Musket without any alteration of the 22 Short chamber.  I have 3 chambered for Shorts, have fired LRs in all 3 many times without any risk. ...

Interesting... I just checked my Hiwall Musket marked 22 Short, and while it chambers the 22 Short just fine, it will NOT chamber a 22LR cartridge.

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3020
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #11 - Jan 26th, 2015 at 7:42pm
Print Post  
In answer to Bob's question about were the Semi-Smokeless loads that good?  I think the answer is "yes" because there was a lot of $$ to be made.  Schuetzen matches were big-time sport.  There were high dollar prizes and lots of wagering.  If there was an economic reason, someone would manufacture highly accurate Shorts.  But the Schuetzen game died out and the Short was ruled out of the Rapid Fire Pistol game.

Terry & I used 2 rather old chronographs  in our velocity measurements. We finally gave up on one. They both absolutely devoured 9-volt batteries.  When we began to notice really erratic velocities, we changed batteries.  We shoot on a sheltered outdoor range, not indoors.  And neither of us knew (still don't) what distance the manufacturers measure velocity.  Different distances probably accounts for a lot.   

We used Terry's rifle to test velocities for 3 or 4 lots of Eley Match, just because the velocity for each lot was printed on the box.  Our numbers never matched the numbers on the box.

But the CCI Target Shorts are 97 % as accurate, with 3 or 4 flyers per box.  I think they are completely competitive for our winter gallery Schuetzen.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Aonghas
Ex Member


Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #12 - Jan 28th, 2015 at 8:21am
Print Post  
BP wrote on Jan 26th, 2015 at 5:20pm:
waterman wrote on Apr 29th, 2014 at 6:52pm:
... FWIW, 22 LR cartridges are easily chambered in a Winchester Winder Musket without any alteration of the 22 Short chamber.  I have 3 chambered for Shorts, have fired LRs in all 3 many times without any risk. ...

Interesting... I just checked my Hiwall Musket marked 22 Short, and while it chambers the 22 Short just fine, it will NOT chamber a 22LR cartridge.



Nor should it. Sometimes a previous owner opens the chamber up to accept ·22"LR, but the rifling is nearly always badly matched to the LR round.

--
Aonghas
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3020
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #13 - Jan 28th, 2015 at 11:04am
Print Post  
The earlier Winchester Muskets (before Winder modifications, and both 1st & 2nd Model Winders) were made for the civilian, pre-WW1 market, and were intended for the then-new practice of "military rifle shooting".  Those were mainly ordered by individuals or in small batches by state militia or National Guard units.  They could be ordered in either Short or Long Rifle, with the appropriate chambers & twists.  A rifle set up for Shorts probably would not accept Long Rifle cartridges.   

Third Model Winders (by far the most common) were made as military training rifles during WW1.  They were apparently made in batches of about 3,000 and were chambered to some military specification.  The cartridges commonly used were something called "Government Special", really more of a CB cartridge than a Short.  But for mass production of soldiers, rifles, and cartridges, 22s were 22s.  Everything had to fit.  The same sort of elongated chambers were common in the lower-end rifles, boy's rifles, etc., made by other manufacturers.

Purpose-built target rifles chambered for Short will not accept Long Rifle cartridges.  The Stevens-Pope I am using as a test rifle will not accept a Long Rifle cartridge.

If anyone has a Stevens 404 or 414 with a 22 Short barrel, does your chamber accept Long Rifles?  I ask the same question of anyone with a purpose-built original gallery Schuetzen in 22 Short.  Please check your rifles and post your findings.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3020
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Short Rifle cartridges
Reply #14 - Jan 28th, 2015 at 12:34pm
Print Post  
The effort to market highly accurate (and highly profitable) 22 Shorts (and also Long Rifles) in the period before WW1 was considerable.  Peters and their engineers held a series of patents that largely covered the practical production of semi-smokeless powder.  Beginning in 1897, DuPont R&D engineers spent about 9 years developing manufacturing techniques for semi-smokeless powder that would not infringe on the patents held by Peters.  Lesmok came out as a commercial powder in 1906 or 1907.  If there was not $$ to be made, DuPont would not have invested that heavily in R&D.

The target grade Shorts were listed at 50 cents a box back in the early 1900s, but the better lots probably sold for twice that or more.  Think about present prices for Eley Match or Tenex or their Lapua equivalents.  There was that much profit in Shorts, plus a one-season shelf life.

Both Peters and DuPont were selling a high-demand, high-profit, short shelf-life product to rich people, loaded into Shorts for their winter sport and then loaded into Long Rifle cases for the outdoor smallbore season.  Factory workers did not buy many Winchester 52s or BSA Martinis.

King's Semi-Smokeless and Lesmok were both the standard powders used for high-level 22 rimfire (both Short & Long Rifle) target ammunition through the 1930s.  My understanding is that the last batch of Lesmok was loaded in 1947.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint