ASSRA Forum › General › Collecting Single Shot Rifles › Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
(Moderator Group: Moderator)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Lowest LowWall S/Ns? (Read 5793 times)
bohemianway
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 648
Location: Andover, MN
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Jan 5th, 2014 at 7:54pm
Print Post  
I am just curious where 5899 fits in. By the number it should be an 1886 build. 32RF, 28" #1 full octagon, highwall block, rebated sides, plain jane, unmodified. I have been saving it for building something from but I do not want to if it is "special".

Thank you,
Charles
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #1 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 8:49pm
Print Post  
Campbell's Vol. 1 discusses the earliest low-walls in considerable detail--seems they were already being produced very soon after high-walls.  So, yours would not be an ultra-early one.  However, all the ones having the HW block are scarce enough that they deserve to be preserved unaltered, in my opinion.

Checked the book--says the lowest no. he's seen was 28xx, but believes the first ones came in at 22xx.
« Last Edit: Jan 5th, 2014 at 9:10pm by Redsetter »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2846
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #2 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 9:13pm
Print Post  
Scarce enough to preserve it as a .32 RF?  They make very nice offhand rifles in .22 LR.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #3 - Jan 5th, 2014 at 10:36pm
Print Post  
waterman wrote on Jan 5th, 2014 at 9:13pm:
Scarce enough to preserve it as a .32 RF?  They make very nice offhand rifles in .22 LR.


I wouldn't balk at merely relining to .22; but I'd keep the action, barrel & stock together.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #4 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 12:20am
Print Post  
Redsetter,

Are you saying that original 32RF block and extractor won't need to be modified to use with your proposed relined 22RF barrel?

  
There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Redsetter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 3468
Location: New York
Joined: Aug 6th, 2013
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #5 - Jan 6th, 2014 at 7:39am
Print Post  
BP wrote on Jan 6th, 2014 at 12:20am:
Redsetter,

Are you saying that original 32RF block and extractor won't need to be modified to use with your proposed relined 22RF barrel?



Of course it would--and that wasn't MY proposal.  But if someone's determined to shoot with it, wouldn't that be preferable to more drastic alterations, such as re-barreling, or what you see in the above photo?  If the bore was any good, converting it to 32 Long CF would be the least invasive thing that could be done.
« Last Edit: Jan 6th, 2014 at 7:58am by Redsetter »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2846
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #6 - Jan 7th, 2014 at 1:33am
Print Post  
Re: the above photo.  That is the original 22 barrel, but it probably has been lined. It was probably either a Short or a Long, because the rifle was made before the LR was marketed.  The original stock is back in the shooter's workshop. The original screws that held the original stock have been preserved.  I do not know if that is the original lever.  If so, it has been modified.

The stock in the photo is a work-in-progress, with modern screws holding it in place. 

Remember, all those old original Winchesters started out as parts in bins or on racks.  Winchester was pretty good about interchangeable parts.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2846
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #7 - Jan 7th, 2014 at 1:49am
Print Post  
If you want to really gnash your teeth, here is a close-up of the lever.  It's hard to see from this angle, but there is a hand-made set of finger rests attached to an original lever with two small hose clamps.

I think these modifications are a tribute to a man with a lot of imagination and a limited budget.  Others may think it's time for the pitchforks and torches.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #8 - Jan 7th, 2014 at 1:53am
Print Post  
waterman,

How much more radiused are the upper rear corners of your early (tall) lowwall breach block compared to the standard hiwall block?

  
There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
waterman
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2846
Location: Behind the Redwood Curtain
Joined: Jun 9th, 2004
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #9 - Jan 8th, 2014 at 12:22am
Print Post  
BP,
I had a close look at the Low Wall with the high block today.  The SN on the tang is about 44,700.  I do not know where that fits with the high block series.  Maybe the whole rifle is parts.  The barrel was originally a 22 Long and now has a liner.   

Before I went to the range, I looked at the block of my 1903-vintage High Wall.  The blocks do not appear to me to be identical.  Here are 2 pics of the high block action.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
bohemianway
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 648
Location: Andover, MN
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #10 - Jan 8th, 2014 at 6:34pm
Print Post  
Pictures of Lowwall #5899
  
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11522
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: Lowest LowWall S/Ns?
Reply #11 - Jan 8th, 2014 at 7:00pm
Print Post  
The only lowall with tall breech block I ever owned, had a block like the one in Bohemianways post. Serial number 5XX. It had been hammered on also.   

      Joe.
  
A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ASSRA Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2024. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge

Page completed in 0.9691 seconds.