Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Normal Topic Value/Scarcity (Read 10489 times)
powderhead
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 163
Joined: Jun 28th, 2009
Value/Scarcity
Apr 16th, 2013 at 8:45pm
Print Post  
I was able to buy a nice example of a Stevens boys rifle at the Tulsa gun show last week, and during my negotiating the price with the man selling the gun he mentioned that it wasn't worth as much as the same model in a common caliber.  What I bought was a model 16 1/2 in .32 shot.
    
I have always felt that the more rare the caliber the more scarce the piece is and that the price should be higher.  In other words, if you had two equally good rifles, one in a common caliber and one in an odd caliber, the odd one should sell at a higher price because of its scarcity.  Of course, I think this does not take into consideration whether you want to shoot the piece or not.  If you are collecting shooters, an odd caliber is not necessarily a desirable thing.

I am not a bit disappointed that the man felt the way he did, but it started me wondering about this matter.  How do you guys feel about this - value based on scarcity?

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
« Last Edit: Apr 16th, 2013 at 9:09pm by powderhead »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Value/Scarcity
Reply #1 - Apr 16th, 2013 at 8:58pm
Print Post  
Sometimes they go hand in hand. Othertimes not. Scarcity does not always mean it is worth a lot of money. For example, I have an example of a Stevens Bisley Model. Very rare gun. Not a realy high dollar gun. Market determines value and sometimes there seems to be no rhyme or reason to it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
powderhead
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 163
Joined: Jun 28th, 2009
Re: Value/Scarcity
Reply #2 - Apr 16th, 2013 at 9:18pm
Print Post  
Slumlord, I know you're a Stevens collector, so you may be interested in some other Stevens that I saw at Tulsa.  There was a Sure Shot that had been re-done with new blue and nickle which ruins it for me, though.  Price was $1600.  The guy had a $1600 gun that he put $200 into it and made it worth $400. What a shame!  I walked away shaking my head.   

Then there was a small frame "side plate" for $700.  It was a decent gun, and I dawdled and lost out on that one.  I'm still kicking myself, as I felt it was well worth it.

If you've never been to Tulsa, you're missing a great gun show.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7575
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Value/Scarcity
Reply #3 - Apr 16th, 2013 at 9:23pm
Print Post  
Depends,

Eye appeal is the primary driver for me, both buying and selling. If something 'Pops" looks good, I want it a lot more that more obscure pieces.

Other words it's possible reason that a rifle is rare is nobody wanted it when new, and still will sit unsold today.   

Only caveat is there is no accounting for taste. Everybody's is different too,

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Online



Posts: 1830
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Value/Scarcity
Reply #4 - Apr 17th, 2013 at 12:23am
Print Post  
Rarity is a 2 edged sword.  There needs to be enough of them to create a demand.  But few enough, that the guys that want them for their collection will compete for them.  Also, needs to be a way to identify the item easily, and a book to document the item so that collectors know they have to have it.  Ballards went up almost double when Dutchers book came out.  Same for the recent Rolling Block book and sporter rifles.  Numbered glassware sells for many times what unnumbered examples from the same maker does.  It gives collectors a way to identify it, and know they need it for their collection.

For something like this, I would absolutely love to have it myself.  Condition is beautiful.  But, the .32 shot would make it only a curio, not usable.  So, the demand is only for collectors that don't shoot it.  I would soon tire of it, and pass it on.  Not so with the ones I can shoot. 

A good .22 rimfire in lesser condition will bring more money, as the demand pool is much larger; most gun owners want the ability to shoot their collection, if they ever get that compulsion.  Many never shoot them, but acquire cartridges so that they can.

As James Grant said, (paraphrasing) "Collectors are an odd lot".

On these boys rifles, a huge part of the demand is from guys that owned one when they were a kid and don't now, or that coveted one and didn't own it.  Now, as they enter their second childhood, they are very willing to pay top dollar to fulfill the deficiencies of their first childhood.  And, they want beautiful pristine examples, not the version that they had left after a few hard years of neglect.

The formula for value and rarity is simple:  Winchester + Scaricity = Big $.  Not necessarily true for anything else.  Unknown maker + Scarcity = Yawn

dave
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: Value/Scarcity
Reply #5 - Apr 17th, 2013 at 12:40am
Print Post  
What the intended use will be often causes me to select a more common model over a scarcer one, and I don't collect something I won't be able to eventually shoot. Wall hangers and safe queens just don't trip my trigger or open my wallet.

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mwhite49
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1600
Location: Camarillo California
Joined: Nov 14th, 2007
Re: Value/Scarcity
Reply #6 - Apr 17th, 2013 at 8:29am
Print Post  
There are a whole lot of Collectors out there that will pay a premium on an obscure caliber. Somre rifles by the records only show maybe 2-6 rifles out of say 100,000 that were chambered in a certain round. That would be a rarity worth more. Most of the stuff I purchase I only purchase because I want to shoot them. Some others buy only to collect and will never shoot what they buy. .32 shot would probably be a premium in the condition shown. my 2 cents worth. 
I purchased a Farrow in 22 and sold it way low as I'm not a Farrow lover. The person who purchased it was and is extremly happy.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Value/Scarcity
Reply #7 - Apr 17th, 2013 at 9:22pm
Print Post  
The Side Plate sounded like a good deal. The Sure Shot is a darned shame. Unless the gun is a total wreck, a refinish like that is an irreversible error. I do have a Junior though that I eventually refinished the stock. Hated to do it but the stock was a real mess and the metal and the bore were excellent. I looked at it for a long time before I finally did the stock. The finish on the stock was just so far off the condition of the metal that I just could not see leaving it as it was. 
Speaking of odd calibers the price can go either way. I usually gladly pay a premium for a .22 short gun. On the other end I got a deal on a 418 Walnut Hill because it was in .25 Stevens. It also helped that the guy did not know what model it was. Gun was in excellent shape. It is the nicest 418 I have.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: Value/Scarcity
Reply #8 - Apr 17th, 2013 at 9:26pm
Print Post  
Powderhead, I forgot to comment that that is a really nice 16 1/2 and yes I would buy one that nice even if it goes against my normal rule that I have to be able to shoot it. I have a supply of .32 Long but no .32 Shot ammo.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint