Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Early Ballistics Work (Read 12260 times)
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: Early Ballistics Work
Reply #30 - Oct 10th, 2012 at 10:48pm
Print Post  
BP I was trying to keep others from jumping on the pistol bandwagon and starting a discussion not  directly related to ours on Mann's findings. 

When you look at the bullets out of Mann's short test barrels one can really get a visual on the base of the bullet trying to pass up the nose and the accordion effect as well as the nose slump affect. Also while looking at the those test bullets one will also notice that the nose always slumped to a different position from test to test. This is exactly what is happening to our breach seated bullets within the constraints of the barrel. My 32-40 bullet at 1450fps in a 15 twist barrel is spinning at 69,600 RPM's and that pointed unsupported spitzer nose is trying its best to not slump over to one side by the centrifugal forces being applied to it and it takes allot of alloy strength to help it hang in there. If it just can't hang in there and slumps over it becomes just like an unbalanced drive shaft and use that as an example because use ole folks have likely experienced those results. 

J.Louis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7249
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: Early Ballistics Work
Reply #31 - Oct 10th, 2012 at 11:57pm
Print Post  
John,
It could have implications as to why the Miller short can work with such high breech pressures, compared to the 32/40. 

It would be interesting to compare the muzzle pressures between the two. I also have QL but, I don't have time to run the numbers tonight.

See you in the morning,

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
MIKE-T
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


[SHOOTCAST>

Posts: 636
Location: Wexford Township Michigan
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Early Ballistics Work
Reply #32 - Oct 11th, 2012 at 9:53am
Print Post  
J Louis I understand what you are saying about the handguns and I wasn't trying to jump on the handgun bandwagon "BP I was trying to keep others from jumping on the pistol bandwagon and starting a discussion not directly related to ours on Mann's findings." Since short barrel rifles are not legal under the present laws, only a ballistics lab with an exemption could now perform those Mann tests, I have a XP-100 that can have as short a barrel as I want on it legally &  I will be receiving a damaged 30BR barrel for it  sometime late winter early spring, I know it’s not a 32-40 or 32 miller short but a soft cast bullet will never know the difference where the pressure comes from, and I have the 185gr P. Jones 30001 plain base spitzer mould to use with different alloys, if time allows and depending on where the damage is located in the barrel {if salvageable I will use it to build a unlimited pistol for CBA competition} I may perform some tests using it and a Chronograph plus the  Pressure Trace II system which will be my Christmas present to myself this year. It could provide some interesting insights into the short barrel, soft bullet/muzzle pressure base expanding noted in Mann’s book and relate to spire pointed soft bullet nose slump, do not have the funds to try the different twist barrels but it would also be an interesting project to try a super fast twist versus the ideal? Twist barrel with soft pointed cast bullets, would need someone to provide a stop or super slow motion digital camera, some different twist barrels to actually see bullet nose slump in flight, as I have never seen a correctly recovered bullet showing the slump (I would like to have a member or anyone if they have one to please post a photo of a recovered bullet with nose slump) or a video showing it in flight.

See next post: Mike
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MIKE-T
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


[SHOOTCAST>

Posts: 636
Location: Wexford Township Michigan
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Early Ballistics Work
Reply #33 - Oct 11th, 2012 at 9:56am
Print Post  
I’m old fashioned and have to see actual physical results done to a recovered bullet or video from carefully recorded tests or from testing done in an analytical manner, not theory.

That is why I brought up the Dan Wesson because if I had it yet, I would be out back at the range with my Ransom rest running some tests [if it ever stops raining] with soft bullets to see the actual base expansion/mushrooming for myself and test different alloy’s and powders to find if it stops somewhere using different hardness bullets or when the powder used changes the muzzle pressure.
Mike
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 [3] 
Send TopicPrint