Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ? (Read 4737 times)
dogman
Ex Member


To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Feb 3rd, 2012 at 2:37pm
Print Post  
So,tell me how do you know if you should compess your load or just let the bullet set on top of the wad...Will your target let you know?

And what to you find the better way to go?Full  length or just neck size? There has to be some bullet tension to hole the bullet in the case or does this not matter...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11474
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #1 - Feb 3rd, 2012 at 2:50pm
Print Post  
A couple years ago I gave up and went back to basics. Dont size my brass and dont compress my powder.  Everything works a lot better. 

My rifles shoot as good as ever.  I spend a lot less time fussing at the loading bench too.   

Of course if you like loading ammo, thats great!


            Joe. 


  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzendave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Retired Ex-Shooter

Posts: 4051
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Joined: Jan 28th, 2005
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #2 - Feb 3rd, 2012 at 3:03pm
Print Post  
For BPCR I do not size my cases; I only neck size and bell the mouths. This way the bullet will be better centered in the throat, compared to a sized case.

Compression of black powder seems to be more important when using unpolished black powder. 

Cartridge grade powders and Swiss black powder have been polished; resulting in the angular powder corners being rounded down. Therefore polished powders compress easier. However those rough corners on unpolished powders  require some compression to compact them to the right density for more consistent velocities.

With GOEX (not the Cartridge grade) I found I had to vibrate or compress in addition to using a drop tube.

With Swiss I have been most successful just drop tubing and placing the bullet on top of the powder.

After neck sizing and belling; I tap the loaded round in the FL sizer (with the decapping rod removed) to flatten out the bell and provide full friction from the case neck without crimping.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7282
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #3 - Feb 3rd, 2012 at 3:35pm
Print Post  
Dave,
I'm a little confused (fairly normal at my age).

Are you saying that you bell the case mouth over size and then bump it back down in the FL sizer so that it just fits the chamber neck?

From a earlier post, I though you belled it to chamber size and left it like that.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Schuetzendave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Retired Ex-Shooter

Posts: 4051
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Joined: Jan 28th, 2005
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #4 - Feb 3rd, 2012 at 3:51pm
Print Post  
Yes I like to leave the bell flared and use a cartridge seater to force the case into the chamber to improve centering the bullet in the lead. However you can only do this for receivers you can use a cartridge seater in the action. i.e. 1885 High Wall, 1874 Sharps or Remington Hepburn.

Also some shooting events are time restricted and you may not be able to afford the time to use a cartrdige seater. i.e trade off sight in shots in a Silhoutte match versus taking time to use a seater. Loading fixed cartrideges by themselves is much faster.

Sometimes you have to trade off a slight edge in accuracy to meet your time requirements.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dogman
Ex Member


Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #5 - Feb 3rd, 2012 at 6:24pm
Print Post  
All very interesting...The only thing that really has me confused is..With the powder compressed and a wad with the bullet just seated on the wad...I figured you had to have some case neck tension to hold the bullet in place..
So my thought was if the case is full length sized,then the mouth expanded to start the bullet,that you would get close to identical pressure from shot to shot..There by giving better accuracy..And running the loaded round up into the seating die to remove the bell,so the round will chamber with ease..
One other question..At what distance is the best for evaluating the load?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MerwinBray
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


Aw Gees

Posts: 937
Location: Kansas City, KS
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #6 - Feb 3rd, 2012 at 7:42pm
Print Post  
Dogman,

This is one of those "ask 10 people get twelve answers" questions.  Smiley

I have some guns that do better one way than the other. In other words, the same load techniques don't apply across the board. 

In my roller (perdersoli) I drop tube 63 grains of swiss 1.5 then compress very slightly ( about a 1/16th inch iirc). If I compress more groups widen in a hurry.

I use standard neck sizing, which NORMLLY is intended for jacketed bullets of .457 neck dia. This sets me up for neck tension out of the gate as my bullets are sized to .459. But that is not all of the story. Brass, as any metal, has "spring" to it. So when neck sized down it may be smaller than .457, say, .456. Now I have a problem. That with deform the soft slugs we use and ruin any hope for accuracy.

I have bought SEVERAL expander plugs over the years. From track of the wolf and Buffalo Arms (both great places to buy from and support!) So after neck sizing I run the proper expander to give me just right about a thousandths of an inch undersize neck. This gives good tension in this gun. (my trapdoors need crimp, more because of need to build pressure to upset the base of bullet to fill notoriously oversized grooves. that is a different story tho).

Then drop tube, place .030 fiber wad then use compression plug to depth. As I seat the bullet I set the dies to take all but the smallest bit of bell out. I read somewhere that the slight bell helps some how. Perhaps it was the centering of the slug as mentioned above. I don't remember where I read it, it just seemed to work. I DID have to take my first batch back to the bench as, like an idiot, I didn't check to be sure they would chamber with the bell still present. Doh! So I had to find that setting on the seating die to get the bell almost smoothed.
I am no champion shooter. Have had some luck when I put time into it and my mind. I tinker too much. But that  gun will shoot doing all of that. All guns are different. I will shut up now. Cheesy
  

Great Plains Precision Rifle Club
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzendave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Retired Ex-Shooter

Posts: 4051
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Joined: Jan 28th, 2005
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #7 - Feb 3rd, 2012 at 8:10pm
Print Post  
Testing distance is dependent on bullet shape and caliber.

A .32  spire point cast bullet can be tested out to 200 yards. For longer ranges pointy spire points do not do as well as flatter or more round nosed bullets. The pointy bullets really work well in the wind at the shorter ranges.

We frequently use .40 or larger calibers for longer ranges. These bullets have fatter ogives since spire points do not maintain their balance well over long distances. I like to test at least out to 300 yards to verify the performance of the bullet shape and weight of bullets used for long distance shooting. Of course 500 yards is even better for testing long distance bullets.

I test all bullets at 100 yards to verify changes in the sweet spots of a rifle barrel. However to verify .32 caliber accuarcy I verify at the 200 yards; the distance which we shoot competitions. 

For larger cast bullet calibers I like to verify at 300 to 550 yards depending if I have a range long enough.
Best to verify the loads at the distance you will compete at:

i.e. Silhoute: 220, 330, 440 and 550 yards for chickens, pigs, turkeys and rams.

Some use a lighter pointier bullet for the chickens than they will use for the longer distances for the other critters.

I shoot .32 caliber bullets .002 wider than groove diameter (since I breech seat them) and .40 and .45 BPCR bullets .001 wider than groove diameter. Therefore I do not need to crimp my bullets since they are tight in the neck; but not too tight to cause deformation of the 1:20 alloy.
« Last Edit: Feb 3rd, 2012 at 10:47pm by Schuetzendave »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MikeT
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 294
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Joined: Sep 7th, 2005
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #8 - Feb 3rd, 2012 at 10:22pm
Print Post  
dogman,

Unfortunately nobody can really explain what is going to work best in your rifle.  What works good in my 40-82 does not work very well in my 40-70SS, and my 45-70 takes another method to get the best load.
All of them shoot PP bullets very well.

The bottom line is start trying stuff and keep very detailed notes.  Somethings are fairly universal, for example, most folks find a good Swiss load with not much compression.   

I recommend a paper wad in the primer pocket because it seems to help all of my rifle loads, but I also shoot mostly pistol primers.  Other folks shoot just fine scores without primer wads.

Of the eight rifles I shoot [all BP] only one shoots well with minimum neck tension.  But some folks swear by the zero neck tension method.

To answer your first question about compression, start load development with minimum compression and continue adding powder to your load until you see a good group, then add a slight bit more to see if it opens up the group, then you know what you need for compression.   

With all the trigger time you will get while testing powder, primers, compression, case condition, etc, the groups will automatically start getting better.  Wink

Keep on hav'n fun!
MikeT
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7282
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #9 - Feb 4th, 2012 at 12:34am
Print Post  
I think Mike T has very good advice, especially for someone starting out. 

Learning is one of the most enjoyable parts to this sport. Never let your mind rest and try LOTS of things. A chronograph can help, too but BP is hard on them. BP is very limiting in some ways but very open in looking for and finding the little minor things that can add to accuracy. Trigger time is the best teacher in all disciplines of our sport.

Frank

  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
dogman
Ex Member


Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #10 - Feb 4th, 2012 at 8:02am
Print Post  
Once again ,thanks to you guys I am getting information that is helping me to better understand what is going on..And I appreciate it...Maybe I am just a slow learner....
The farthist I have to shoot right now is just a tad under 300 yards...I have another place with 500 yards but if others are there,you can't do it..

And one other thing I would like to ask if it's alright...Maybe I read too damn much...I see where some guys claim to be getting their best accuracy using 1 F Goex in the 45-70 while using mag.primers..
DOES this sound right or all B.S ??????
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MerwinBray
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


Aw Gees

Posts: 937
Location: Kansas City, KS
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #11 - Feb 4th, 2012 at 8:08am
Print Post  
I doubt it is BS. It is more of what all of us have sort of collectively said. Every gun and every load is different. I have not tried 1f. Maybe I should! I have read that before too. (see, this where I tinker too much). 
One more word on experimenting. Try to change only ONE thing each time or you may not know what change was the improvement or the bugaboo to your load. It is hard to hone in without notes notes notes!!
  

Great Plains Precision Rifle Club
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MikeT
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 294
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Joined: Sep 7th, 2005
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #12 - Feb 4th, 2012 at 8:42am
Print Post  
dogman,

I am one of those that uses Fg Swiss & Goez for many different cartridges, e.g. 45-70, 40-82, & 40-70SS.  I shoot only PP bullets.  All of my rifles shoot well with pistol primers when loaded with Swiss.  Fg Goex shoot the best with BR-2 primers.  I use a primer wad under all primers no matter what.   

So to answer your question about magnum primers, I would not waste my time with them.  Magnum primers are very early, old news regarding BP cartridge reloading.
Now that is not to say that you cannot find someone still doing it or that some powder-cartridge combination may benifit from magnum primers.  I shoot 40-50BN, 40-65, 40-70SS, 40-82 Win, 40-82 Sil, 45-70, and every one shoots very well with Swiss powder & pistol primers.

Keep on hav'n fun!
MikeT
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Schuetzendave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Retired Ex-Shooter

Posts: 4051
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Joined: Jan 28th, 2005
Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #13 - Feb 4th, 2012 at 10:34am
Print Post  
I use magnum primers; not for the ignition potential, but since it helps burn up and reduces the fouling.
Yes pistol primers will ignite black powder quite well, but their flash is not as good at helping burn out the residues still floating in the barrel after a shot.

I also use a newspaper wad over the flash hole to reduce powder acting like a fuse in the flash hole channel.

Improvements in accuracy I achieved from testing. But it is best that you test for your rifle and powder load to confirm what works best for you.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dogman
Ex Member


Re: To compress or not to compress??--FL size or ?
Reply #14 - Feb 5th, 2012 at 8:57am
Print Post  
Kiss KissMikeT---So when are r using this 1F Goex powder,do you feel you have to use little or more compression compared to the 2F Goex powder..I have been reading Wolfs book over again and if I read it right he said that compression may not be need at all as long as there is no air space in the cartridge..Then he mention if the compression is TOO much it may be harder to ignite it and some of the charge will be blown out the bore behind the bullet..Which if one thinks about it ,it could happen...I picture something like a bottle rocket going down the barrel,,lol.........
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint