Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) 4100 vs AA9 (Read 13391 times)
JackHughs
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 657
Location: Riverbank
Joined: Sep 27th, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #15 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 10:50am
Print Post  
tenx wrote on Jan 13th, 2012 at 8:36am:
Van,

  I using 12.2 grs. of AA#9 behind a 205 gr. bullet. It's very accurate. Haven't got a 250 yet but have gotten a coupla 249's.

The big problem for me is after firing two or three rds. with one case you have to beat on the lever to get the case out. 


I believe that the internal volume of the .32 Miller Short is very close, if not identical, to the .32-20 CPA.  With that in mind, I checked my old chrono data for AA#9 loads in the .32-20 CPA.

It required 11.8 grains of AA#9 to bring the extreme spreads down to single digits.  However, at that load, cases were very difficult to extract and they showed plain signs if incipient case head separation after a few firings.

With AA#9, maximum pressures increase dramatically with small increases in powder charge.  Considering the pressure-related problems I experienced with 11.8 grains, it's not surprising that you experience difficult extraction at 12.2 grains.

I think that you will be very happy with 4100.  However, even 4100 is not forgiving of loads exceeding 12.8 grains in the .32-20 CPA.  And, at maximum loads, you have to very careful of seating depth.

My cold weather load is 13.0 grains of 4100.  This is right on the ragged edge as far a pressure goes.  By backing-off seating depth by approximately .020", I can cause hard extraction with this load.

JackHughs   
  

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.  W.B. Yeats
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Van
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 251
Location: Uath
Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #16 - Jan 14th, 2012 at 3:02pm
Print Post  
Thanks,   i have 4 pounds of 4100 on the way, will work up loads for the MS and let you know how it go.

van
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #17 - Jan 15th, 2012 at 2:02pm
Print Post  
tenx wrote on Jan 13th, 2012 at 8:36am:
I using 12.2 grs. of AA#9 behind a 205 gr. bullet. It's very accurate. Haven't got a 250 yet but have gotten a coupla 249's.
The big problem for me is after firing two or three rds. with one case you have to beat on the lever to get the case out.
Pete


Quickload says that one is over 35K psi.   Not to wonder that cases are sticking.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #18 - Jan 15th, 2012 at 7:53pm
Print Post  
35,000 PSI is actually quite mild and nothing I would be concerned about with maybe the exception of a cast Ballard action. The 308 using 40.0 grs. of H-322 and 150gr. bullet generates 60212 PSI for comparison sake only. 

J.Louis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #19 - Jan 15th, 2012 at 10:10pm
Print Post  
uscra112,

Interesting and since you use .357 Mag., or .357 Max. cases that might be the cause of the sticking.Do you know what those cases are made to withstand in their respective calibers?

Pete
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #20 - Jan 15th, 2012 at 10:29pm
Print Post  
For the 357 Remington Maximum and a 210gr. lead bullet a charge of 17.0 grs of XMP5744 shows a CUP of 45300. I am not sure how to change this into PSI but the PSI tends to be a tad higher number.

This is out of the Second Edition of Modern Reloading by Richard Lee and it would be interesting to see what Quickload comes up with for comparison sake. 

J.Louis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
38_Cal
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2247
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Joined: Apr 27th, 2005
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #21 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 1:02am
Print Post  
According to the Accurate Arms loading manual, the .357 Magnum uses a SAAMI maximum average pressure rating of 35,000 psi.  The Maximum is rated at 48,000 cup.  According to a sheet I've got from the old Hercules Powder Co., cup and psi don't always have the same relationship to each other...some cartridges have a much higher maximum cup rating than the same cartridge in psi, and with others it's the opposite.   Huh  There are lots of factors in determining why a particular cartridge sticks in a chamber or has other problems, pressure is only one part of it.   

David
  

David Kaiser
Montezuma, IA
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #22 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 9:50am
Print Post  
Interesting replies John & David. Could easily be the reason I'm getting those sticky cases. Definitely going to be trying the 4100 ASAP.

Question for David..... If all else fails John is trying to talk me into rechambering it in .32/40. Can you do that without setting the barrel back?

Pete
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
38_Cal
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2247
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Joined: Apr 27th, 2005
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #23 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 11:50am
Print Post  
Pete, pm sent.

David
  

David Kaiser
Montezuma, IA
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #24 - Jan 16th, 2012 at 9:51pm
Print Post  
David,  Ditto

Pete
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #25 - Jan 21st, 2012 at 3:54am
Print Post  
JLouis wrote on Jan 15th, 2012 at 7:53pm:
35,000 PSI is actually quite mild and nothing I would be concerned about with maybe the exception of a cast Ballard action. The 308 using 40.0 grs. of H-322 and 150gr. bullet generates 60212 PSI for comparison sake only. 

J.Louis


35KK is a bit steep for .32-20 cases, innit?   Did I miss something?  I thought that's what JackHughes said he was using. . . .   I know it's not for Max cases, I run those well past 40K in my Contender quite a lot.
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JackHughs
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 657
Location: Riverbank
Joined: Sep 27th, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #26 - Jan 21st, 2012 at 12:00pm
Print Post  
uscra112 wrote on Jan 21st, 2012 at 3:54am:


35KK is a bit steep for .32-20 cases, innit?   Did I miss something?  I thought that's what JackHughes said he was using. . . .   I know it's not for Max cases, I run those well past 40K in my Contender quite a lot.


I have a theory regarding high pressure, hard extration, and case failure in the .32-20.  I think it applies to the .32 Miller cases as well.

Over a number of firings using high pressure loads, my .32-20 cases grow longer and longer.  Accordingly, the thickness of the brass in the case wall has to become thinner and thinner.  I believe that the effect of high pressure loads on .32-20 brass is similar to hammer forging a metal bar - the more you hit it, the the more the bar extends in length and becomes thinner.

After so much of this "forging", the brass thins to point that it seperates.

I believe that .32-20 cases subjected to high pressure loads become hard to extract because the brass eventually loses its elasticity and its ability to "spring-back" after firing. 

All of the above is based only on my personal observation of the behavior of 500 individual Starline .32-20 cases, each fired at least 10 times using hot loads of AA#9 and 4100.

JackHughs  

 
  

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.  W.B. Yeats
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ledball
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1011
Location: syracuse, ohio
Joined: Nov 20th, 2009
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #27 - Jan 21st, 2012 at 2:30pm
Print Post  

























Hard case extraction also has to do with certain rifles,for instance, the De haas "sometimes called miller" has a much better extractor than a Stevens.  ledball






  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #28 - Jan 24th, 2012 at 11:34pm
Print Post  
Cases lengthening even in a breech-seat rifle?  Might that not point to more-than-optimum headspace?
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #29 - Jan 25th, 2012 at 12:55am
Print Post  
Uscra the majority of all breach seated calibers being used have rimmed cases and are head spaced off the rim so case stretching / lengthening would have no ill affects. 

On a rimless case then your comment: Might that not point to more-than-optimum headspace? Yes that could indeed be a possibility 

J.Louis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Send TopicPrint