Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) 4100 vs AA9 (Read 13372 times)
Van
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 251
Location: Uath
Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
4100 vs AA9
Jan 10th, 2012 at 12:00am
Print Post  
Has anyone worked with 4100 in the shorter cases like the Miller or Miller Short?
Thinking about trying some my AA9 stach is about all gone.
Oh, while I've got you have you seen much difference in primers in the shorter cases?

Thanks, four finger Van
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JackHughs
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 657
Location: Riverbank
Joined: Sep 27th, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #1 - Jan 10th, 2012 at 12:42am
Print Post  
I use 4100 in .32-20 cases.  4100 is wee bit slower than AA#9 and that makes a huge difference in the .32-20.

The .32-20 case is not particulary robust.  With AA#9, chamber pressure builds much faster with increasing charges than muzzle velocity.

For my particular rifle, best accuracy is achieved at a MV of approximately 1475 fps.  At the AA#9 charge needed to achieve that velocity, cases would show incipient head seperation after three firings.

12.8 grains of 4100 achieves the necessary MV without excess stress on the cases.  However, upping the charge to 13.0 grains will destroy a .32-20 case after five or six firings.

The .32-20 CPA chambering is capable of fine accuracy ( 3/4" vertical dispersion at 200 yards is normal) but the case is fragile and fussy to load.  If I hadn't come across 4100, I would have rechambered the rifle to .32-40.  

JackHughs         
  

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.  W.B. Yeats
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #2 - Jan 10th, 2012 at 12:35pm
Print Post  
@JackHughs - 
What are you using for bullet weight and seating depth?  I assume breech seat, but the weight is unknown.  I ask, because I ran some assumptions in Quickload, and didn't get pressures that would be splitting cases.....
  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JackHughs
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 657
Location: Riverbank
Joined: Sep 27th, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #3 - Jan 10th, 2012 at 3:52pm
Print Post  
uscra112 wrote on Jan 10th, 2012 at 12:35pm:
@JackHughs - 
What are you using for bullet weight and seating depth?  I assume breech seat, but the weight is unknown.  I ask, because I ran some assumptions in Quickload, and didn't get pressures that would be splitting cases.....


Bullet weight is 211 grains.  Yes, the bullet is breech-seated.  

The .32-20 case was designed for low pressure black powder loads.  It's not well suited to this application.

I had one case partially seperate this morning.  It had been fired 8 times with 12.8 grains of 4100 and 3 times with 13.0 grains of 4100.  Although the model may not indicate excessive pressure, these cases nonetheless come apart with irritating regularity.

I would not put up with this amount of grief if only the rifle performed less well.  This morning, with temps in the mid 30's, I shot two 249's at 200 yards.  Vertical dispersion was 9/16" on the first and 3/4" on the second. 

JackHughs   
  

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.  W.B. Yeats
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
38_Cal
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2247
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Joined: Apr 27th, 2005
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #4 - Jan 10th, 2012 at 6:06pm
Print Post  
Interesting discussion.  I'm using about 13.0 gr. 4227 in a .308" 32-20, breech seated in a Ruger No. 3.  Using Starline brass I've got about 35-40 firings per case and (knock wood) never had a brass problem.  Bullets up to 220 gr., cast about 30-1, and have used Emmert and Gapko lubes.  Have not had the consistent vertical dispersion you're reporting, though.  Will have to give 4100 a try if I can find it at the next gun show.

David
  

David Kaiser
Montezuma, IA
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #5 - Jan 11th, 2012 at 9:30am
Print Post  
David,

Got my 4100 at the last Des Moines Show. Forget the outfits name but their about halfway down the left hand side as you go in the door and halfway down the aisle.

Pete
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
38_Cal
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2247
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Joined: Apr 27th, 2005
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #6 - Jan 11th, 2012 at 11:34am
Print Post  
tenx wrote on Jan 11th, 2012 at 9:30am:
David,

Got my 4100 at the last Des Moines Show. Forget the outfits name but their about halfway down the left hand side as you go in the door and halfway down the aisle.

Pete

Thanks, Pete.  Probably Bob's Shooting Supplies from Monroe?

David
  

David Kaiser
Montezuma, IA
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JackHughs
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 657
Location: Riverbank
Joined: Sep 27th, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #7 - Jan 11th, 2012 at 2:01pm
Print Post  
38_Cal wrote on Jan 10th, 2012 at 6:06pm:
Interesting discussion.  I'm using about 13.0 gr. 4227 in a .308" 32-20, breech seated in a Ruger No. 3.  Using Starline brass I've got about 35-40 firings per case and (knock wood) never had a brass problem.  Bullets up to 220 gr., cast about 30-1, and have used Emmert and Gapko lubes.  Have not had the consistent vertical dispersion you're reporting, though.  Will have to give 4100 a try if I can find it at the next gun show.

I experimented with both 4227 and 296 in the .32-20.  There were never any pressure signs even with MV's well over 1500 fps.  However, vertical stringing persisted regardless of MV. 

I believe the vertical dispersion issue, at least in this case, is rifle-specific and due, in part, to the interaction of the shape of the pressure curve, maximum pressure, and my bench set-up.  

I have friends who achieve excellent vertical dispersion using 296 in rifles chambered in .32-40.

JackHughs

  

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.  W.B. Yeats
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
frnkeore
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7282
Location: Central Point, OR 97502
Joined: Jun 16th, 2010
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #8 - Jan 11th, 2012 at 3:08pm
Print Post  
Jack,
Have any primers been better than others regarding your vertical and was 296 and 4227 better for case life?

I've used 296 in the 32/40 and it gives about (at least when I've chronoed it) 5-6 fps ES and 2.6 or less SD.

Frank
  

ASSRA Member #696, ISSA Member #339
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
JackHughs
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 657
Location: Riverbank
Joined: Sep 27th, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #9 - Jan 11th, 2012 at 4:10pm
Print Post  
[quote author=22362A2F212B3621440 link=1326171638/8#8 date=1326312519]Jack,
Have any primers been better than others regarding your vertical and was 296 and 4227 better for case life?
/quote]

The most consistent performance is with Federal 205 GMM primers.  I tried just about everything including small pistol and small pistol magnum primers.  The Federal 205's are the best of the bunch for this application.

I didn't shoot enough of the 4227 or the 296 to determine case life.  That's because I don't load at the bench. Instead, I start with 200 prepped cases, load at home, and shoot one loaded case at a time.  Two hundred shots results in 200 once-fired cases.

JackHughs 
  

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.  W.B. Yeats
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JLouis
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 10625
Joined: Apr 8th, 2009
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #10 - Jan 11th, 2012 at 5:05pm
Print Post  
Gentleman Jack is a close friend and a fellow competitor and to date you would be hard pressed to find some who could honestly steer you in the right direction in regards to the successful use of AA-4100 for our sport. It is not unusual for him to shoot a 250 in his weekly practice sessions and he has also accomplished shooting back to back 250's so please do not take what he has to share lightly. His dedication to load development is second to none and thus his continued success. This success comes from a tremendous amount of hard work and dedication and it is not unusual for him to be at the range on multiple occasions on a weekly basis. He is continually fine tuning his load for the ever changing conditions we face and to get yet more out of what his CPA Rifle has to offer. His willingness to share his priceless information is a true indication of what we who shoot this sport are truly about. 

J.Louis
  

" It Is Better To Now Have Been A Has Been Than A Never Was Or A Wanna Be "
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #11 - Jan 12th, 2012 at 8:26pm
Print Post  
David,

Sounds right. The biggest powder dealer at the show if I recall right.

I plan on using it in my .32 MS. I'm hoping the slower pressure rise will keep the cases from sticking which is a problem in my gun after just a couple of shots using AA#9.

Pete
« Last Edit: Jan 12th, 2012 at 8:32pm by tenx »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
blk43
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 69
Location: Lodi, California
Joined: Apr 26th, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #12 - Jan 12th, 2012 at 8:48pm
Print Post  
I shoot 4100 in my wife's MIller Short with a 206 grain bullet and in my .33 caliber, 239 grain bullet on a .357 Max case.  In both cases I get better 200 yard accuracy than with H108.  Never did have much luck with #9.  It is not consistant from lot to lot in my experience.

Good luck,

Bruce
  

BLK
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Van
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 251
Location: Uath
Joined: Oct 25th, 2005
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #13 - Jan 13th, 2012 at 12:27am
Print Post  
Tenx    what was your load with AA9 in your miller short?
Right now I'm shooting 10.6 with WWSP and haven't had much luck with over about 11.4 in RWS cases.

Van
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: 4100 vs AA9
Reply #14 - Jan 13th, 2012 at 8:36am
Print Post  
Van,

  I using 12.2 grs. of AA#9 behind a 205 gr. bullet. It's very accurate. Haven't got a 250 yet but have gotten a coupla 249's.

The big problem for me is after firing two or three rds. with one case you have to beat on the lever to get the case out. So have been taking along 100 primed cases and only firing one shot with each. Would like to just use one case like I do for every other gun. I can't complain about the accuracy because shooting in the high 240's all the time is nothing to gripe about but think possibly being able to use just one case might up the scores some.

The 4100 was recommended to me by J. Louis who says a few of the shooters out his way are using it and note longer pressure curves. So with a little luck maybe this powder will cure the problem or at least reduce it to a manageable level.

Pete
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Send TopicPrint