Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) antique or ??? (Read 6708 times)
QuestionableMaynard8130
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4144
Location: Benton  Harbor MI
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
antique or ???
Nov 9th, 2011 at 6:44pm
Print Post  
At what serial number does a high-wall shift from an antique that can be freely transferred to an arm that needs to go through an FFL process?

how about other arms?
What is the break point datewise?
  

sacred cows make the best burger
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SSShooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2923
Location: Southern NJ
Joined: Aug 1st, 2010
Re: antique or ???
Reply #1 - Nov 9th, 2011 at 8:16pm
Print Post  
Believe 1899 is the year after which are no longer consider antiques. Per Campbell's book, 85086 is the last High Wall made in 1899.
  

Glenn - 2x CPA 44 1/2 w/22LR (Shilen ratchet-rifled & Bartlein 5R rifled), 38-40RH & 38-55WCF (Bartlein 5R rifled) & 40-65WCF (GrnMtn 'X') barrels
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
MIKE-T
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


[SHOOTCAST>

Posts: 636
Location: Wexford Township Michigan
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: antique or ???
Reply #2 - Nov 9th, 2011 at 8:22pm
Print Post  
Don't hold me to it but I have always used serial #84,700 and below in high walls to be antique and made before 1899.
Mike.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16302
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: antique or ???
Reply #3 - Nov 10th, 2011 at 12:22am
Print Post  
The break point is Dec. 31, 1898 for all guns.
All Ballards are antique, as they stopped production around 1891. Marlins in general are serial numbered together , and not as individual models. They also are recorded by ship date, not mfg. date, so often an old pre 1898 gun will show in the records as shipping later. Marlins before 175,500 are considered antique.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SSShooter
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2923
Location: Southern NJ
Joined: Aug 1st, 2010
Re: antique or ???
Reply #4 - Nov 10th, 2011 at 7:00am
Print Post  
Based on the 12/31/1898 date, the last High Wall that is considered an antique would be 84700 (from Campbell's book).
  

Glenn - 2x CPA 44 1/2 w/22LR (Shilen ratchet-rifled & Bartlein 5R rifled), 38-40RH & 38-55WCF (Bartlein 5R rifled) & 40-65WCF (GrnMtn 'X') barrels
Back to top
GTalk  
IP Logged
 
classicchecker
Ex Member


Re: antique or ???
Reply #5 - Nov 11th, 2011 at 1:24pm
Print Post  
The highwall that I am building has a four digit serial number, and according to Campbells book, was made in 1886.  Practically everything except the action has been replaced.  New block from Wyoming Armory, lower pistol grip tang with wide spaced double set triggers from Ballard Arms Co., new DST sear from Steve Baldwin, and the list goes on!  I found an extremely nice stick of english I will be using for the stocks.  Dave Crossno will be using my pattern stock to duplicate the wood for me.  Crossno also annealed the action before Baldwin trued the face of the action. McGowen Precision has donated a 32 in. heavy round tapered barrel.  They are wanting a little exposure in the BPCR market, so if the barrel shoots, they'll get the exposure.  I just got through threading the barrel, and the new PT&G match 45-70 reamer just came in, so maybe this weekend I'll get it chambered & head spaced.
I swear, building a new rifle is almost as fun as shooting them!  Tim   Smiley Smiley
« Last Edit: Nov 11th, 2011 at 1:30pm by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
QuestionableMaynard8130
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4144
Location: Benton  Harbor MI
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: antique or ???
Reply #6 - Nov 11th, 2011 at 3:59pm
Print Post  
Basically all new, except the action and serial numbered tang even usable with modern mfg ammo.   but its an antique so exempt from all regs???????   or am I misunderstanding things?? Huh
  

sacred cows make the best burger
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
classicchecker
Ex Member


Re: antique or ???
Reply #7 - Nov 11th, 2011 at 6:52pm
Print Post  
Yep, Basically all new except the action.  The serial number on a highwall is on the lower tang, and since mine has been replaced, I will transfer the original serial number to the new lower tang.  Technically it is exempt from the regulations since it was mfg. before 1898, not that it matters to me.  When this rifle is finished it will be a keeper.  However if it came to it, I would treat it as a rifle that had to be transferred based on current regulations of the BATF.  My dealings with BATF auditors tells me that most of them do not know the laws & regulations anyway so why take a chance.  Tim
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1692
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: antique or ???
Reply #8 - Nov 12th, 2011 at 8:51am
Print Post  
Tim, what lever did you choose for your new wall? I built almost the exact rifle other than mine has a 30" barrel about 2 years ago.  I put a Helm lever on it but found that in a 45-70, it bit my fingers a little. Switched it out to the long lazy S which is a lot more comfortable (but uglier) to shoot.  I like the Helm for off hand shooting as it seems easier on the wrist. Bob
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
classicchecker
Ex Member


Re: antique or ???
Reply #9 - Nov 12th, 2011 at 10:46am
Print Post  
Hi Bob, 
    I also used the Helm lever, from Ballard Arms Co.  The two critical things that need fitting are the DST and the Helm lever.  Where the lever bottoms out when closed affects the lock up position of the block.  These two parts (Helm lever & DST pistol grip lower tang) require careful fitting.  I have received excellent advice from Keith at Wyoming Armory in that respect.  
   Yes, I can see where the fingers take a beating with the Helm lever.  After fitting the butt stock and shaping the profile of the grip, I'll heat the finger lever and bend it open a touch for additional clearance.
Whenever I get something worth looking at, I'll post a few photo's.    Tim
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16302
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: antique or ???
Reply #10 - Nov 12th, 2011 at 3:33pm
Print Post  
Technically everything but the serial numbered part can be changed, and it's still antique. Once the serial numbered part is replaced and the same serial number is applied to another tang, receiver, or whatever, it no longer is an antique.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
classicchecker
Ex Member


Re: antique or ???
Reply #11 - Nov 12th, 2011 at 7:38pm
Print Post  
Marlin,  You're probably right about that, but it really gets into a gray area with the regs., so that's why if I ever sold this rifle I would treat it as a modern rifle and the regs. would be adhered to as any currently mfg. rifle.  Thinking about the last audit performed by the BATF on my records, there were two extremely fat buffarilla's who performed the audit.  These two gals barely knew their butts from a hole in the ground.  Almost funny how ignorant they were of the current laws & regulations.  However it was a two day bad dream for me.  Can you imagine explaining the dates of mfg. and the highwall in question to them?  Ha.   Better careful than sorry.   Tim
« Last Edit: Nov 13th, 2011 at 9:54am by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dave
Ex Member


Re: antique or ???
Reply #12 - Nov 13th, 2011 at 12:32am
Print Post  
"buffarilla's"  great word.  I can just picture it, fresh out of DMV.   Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16302
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: antique or ???
Reply #13 - Nov 13th, 2011 at 3:10pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Marlin,  You're probably right about that, but it really gets into a gray area with the regs., so that's why if I ever sold this rifle I would treat it as a modern rifle and the regs. would be adhered to as any currently mfg. rifle.  Thinking about the last audit performed by the BATF on my records, there were two extremely fat buffarilla's who performed the audit.  These two gals barely knew their butts from a hole in the ground.  Almost funny how ignorant they were of the current laws & regulations.  However it was a two day bad dream for me.  Can you imagine explaining the dates of mfg. and the highwall in question to them?  Ha.   Better careful than sorry.   Tim


Believe me, I DO know how rediculous the BATF can get, and that's why I surrendered my FFL years ago, under duress and pressure from them. I'd broken no rules, and they said all my records were in order, but the underlying threats implied were enough for me to give in.
I could go on a long time about all the details, but wont do so here.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint