Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol (Read 9688 times)
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16349
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
May 31st, 2011 at 3:53pm
Print Post  
Anyone know much about the Rolling Block pistols that were made up on the little #4 style actions? I've seen a few of them, all in .22LR, and some target style, while others just plinkers.
I picked one up at our singleshot show Sun. and now I'm looking for info about when they were built, etc....
Don't see them often, and I was surprised to see not only this plain one, but also an engraved target one both at the show, by two different sellers.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1837
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #1 - May 31st, 2011 at 7:10pm
Print Post  
Val,

Was it made on a #4 action, or on the cadet action?  I've never seen one on the #4, but the pistols built on cadets are common.   

A lot of them were built custom by builders after a huge overrun of cadet actions was sold to the public.  If I remember, the time frame that these are contemporary to are 1895 to 1915.

dave
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #2 - May 31st, 2011 at 7:59pm
Print Post  
Some time back, there was a thread on rolling block pistols and someone posted a picture of a pair that had been made from #4 actions. From what I remember of the photo, they were nicely done.
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Tom_Trevor assra life no.71
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


Tom Trevor

Posts: 695
Location: Granada Hills Ca.
Joined: Jun 16th, 2004
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #3 - May 31st, 2011 at 11:33pm
Print Post  
You might see if your local library can get on loan the book " REMINGTON ROLLING BLOCK PISTOLS" by jerry langston Rolling Block Press Buena Park Ca. 1981.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #4 - Jun 1st, 2011 at 5:55am
Print Post  
To see the #4 pistols, go to the 2nd page on this link:

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16349
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #5 - Jun 1st, 2011 at 10:53am
Print Post  
ssdave wrote on May 31st, 2011 at 7:10pm:
Val,

Was it made on a #4 action, or on the cadet action?  I've never seen one on the #4, but the pistols built on cadets are common.  

A lot of them were built custom by builders after a huge overrun of cadet actions was sold to the public.  If I remember, the time frame that these are contemporary to are 1895 to 1915.

dave


???? Now I'm really confused! Wasn't the Cadet built on the #4 action? From what I've read they were. Either way, this looks like a #4 or Cadet action with takedwon lever and the top tang bent to a pistol grip shape.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16349
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #6 - Jun 1st, 2011 at 10:56am
Print Post  
Tom_Trevor assra life no.71 wrote on May 31st, 2011 at 11:33pm:
You might see if your local library can get on loan the book " REMINGTON ROLLING BLOCK PISTOLS" by jerry langston Rolling Block Press Buena Park Ca. 1981.


Thanks, I may have to check the library. I saw Womack's has that book for sale, but since I don't plan on getting deep into Rolling Block pistols I probably don't want to buy a copy. 
I've got every other book on rolling Blocks, but none of them cover pistols much, especially these smaller framed ones.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #7 - Jun 1st, 2011 at 3:35pm
Print Post  
I think the Cadet rifle and the Navy pistol (not the earlier spur trigger version, but the later one with the trigger guard) had similar pattern frames. 

Both had that distinctive belly to the frames that reminds me of a dairy cow that's overdue for milking.
  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ssdave
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1837
Location: Eastern Oregon
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #8 - Jun 1st, 2011 at 11:39pm
Print Post  
The cadets were made on a 1867 Navy Rolling Block pistol frame.  As mentioned before, it has a perch belly lower profile to the action, and the action top has no rim or ridge at the rear where it meets the grip.

There's a lot of speculation that there's no such thing as an 1867 navy pistol.  Some claim it is a modification of the 1865 spur trigger model, still others claim it is a modification of the navy cadet carbine.  I know that a lot of them I see are shop made; the story I've heard with them is that remington had a huge surplus of cadet actions, and sold them off to custom builders.  Take your pick of the stories to suit what you're trying to sell is what most sellers do.

If yours has the takedown on the front right corner, it isn't an 1867 pistol action but is probably a #4.  I've never seen an 1867 takedown.  They all had a threaded barrel with the same thread as a blackpowder #1.  Bannerman sold a large number of new surplus .50 cadet barrels a few years ago, and I see them installed on #1 actions and chambered for .50-70 quite often.

The other pistol you see very rarely is the 1871 Army pistol, the 1891 target pistol, and the 1901 target pistol.  They share their frame with the #7 rolling block rifle.  According to Flaydermans, only about 7500 total of the three was made.  They have kind of a peak or rim to the top of the frame at the rear where it meets the grip.

I'd hazard a guess that a #4 framed pistol is a custom conversion, as I've never heard of a factory one.  I did a quick look through my books to see if anything; but nothing surfaced.  But, there's always  surprises out there, and I'm definitely not an authority on them!

dave


marlinguy wrote on Jun 1st, 2011 at 10:53am:
???? Now I'm really confused! Wasn't the Cadet built on the #4 action? From what I've read they were. Either way, this looks like a #4 or Cadet action with takedwon lever and the top tang bent to a pistol grip shape.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BP
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 8039
Location: Westside
Joined: Aug 27th, 2006
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #9 - Jun 2nd, 2011 at 2:29am
Print Post  
Val,

Were you thinking of the 28" long barreled #4 that Remington released as the 4S "Boy Scout" rifle, and that was later renamed to the 4S "Military Model" rifle? 

I've got to agree with Dave. None of my literature indicates that Remington produced a pistol using the #4 frame. Do the serial numbers, caliber stamps and roll marks all look correct? 

Can you post a couple pictures?
« Last Edit: Jun 2nd, 2011 at 2:37am by BP »  

There are three kinds of men: The ones that learn by reading, the few who learn by observation, and the rest who have to pee on the electric fence and find out for themselves.
Proud Noodlehead
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16349
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #10 - Jun 2nd, 2011 at 11:35am
Print Post  
I'm going from John Gyde' and Roy Marcot's book on the Remington .22 rifles. In that treatise he lists the Boy Scout version and the Cadet version both as being based on the #4 action, and neither have the retaining pins and plate of the Rolling Block Navy pistol, or Army pistol. They actually list that gun in Rem. catalog as the "No. 4-S Cadet" model. Built from 1911-1912 only. Boy Scout from 1913-1914, and Military Model from 1914-1923. Combinedd production of around 6,000 guns.
Since both of the pistols at the show seemed identical, (except for barrels) I thought it must be something Rem. built based on leftover #4 actions, since comparing it to one of my #4's it's definitely that action, but with different tangs. I suppose it could just be a very popular gunsmith rework, and that would explain seeing so many of them. I need to do more research and see what's up.
I'll try to get it apart and check numbers, possible frame mods, etc. and post pics.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Posts: 16349
Location: Oregon
Joined: Feb 2nd, 2009
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #11 - Jun 2nd, 2011 at 11:41am
Print Post  
Just found another reference in the Rem. .22 book to the other Cadet rifle Dave mentioned. On page 48 he states, "The #4 Cadet should not be confused with the larger caliber Cadet rifles marketed by Hartley & Co. at the turn of the century utilizing Rem. Model 1866 Navy pistol frames. Rem. #1 1/2 Sporting frames and Rem. #2 Sporting frames." 
So part of the mystery on Cadet labeled guns is clearer to me now.
  

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RBKenn
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 278
Location: fallon
Joined: Apr 8th, 2011
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #12 - Jun 26th, 2011 at 11:52am
Print Post  
Remington rolling block #4 actions have a unique feature, the block and hammer are mounted on screws rather than pins. Remington did not make a pistol on this action, however, Landskron does document several that were made (modified) by custom gunsmiths from #4 rifle actions.  The lever take down feature on the #4 rifle was itself unique to rifles produced from 1890 until 1924, It is a weak system that Remington abandoned in favor of the left side mounted screw (take down system) for the third generation of #4 rifles almost always found with round barrels.  Remington pistols made on both the Navy and Army frames have breech block and hammer mounted on pins with pin retainer plates.   
If you see a #4 rifle in center fire configuration, that will also be an aftermarket modification as Remington only produced for sale #4s in rim fire cartridges.   
As for the military cadet rifles made on the Navy pistol frames, They are well documented in Landskron's book and it is practically the only source for most of that information.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MAD MIKE
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 655
Location: So Cal
Joined: Oct 31st, 2006
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #13 - Jun 27th, 2011 at 2:28am
Print Post  
I don't know what all this confusion is about, but the Rem. rolling block pistol was based on the #2 rifle frame. According to deHaas' SINGLE SHOT RIFLES & ACTIONS, the Army model was made in 1871 & the target (.22 RF) model was made in 1901, both based on the #2 rifle action. That's page 62, upper left.         ...MIKE...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bull Schmitt
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 39
Location: Ohio
Joined: May 31st, 2011
Re: OT (a bit) Rolling Block pistol
Reply #14 - Jun 28th, 2011 at 12:05pm
Print Post  
It is my impression that converting a rifle to a pistol is forbidden by Federal law. I have seen some early single shot rifles that had been converted years ago. Is there a "cutoff" date that lets early/antique rifles to be converted? Huh
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint