Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) no bolt guns? (Read 27797 times)
KWK
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 402
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
no bolt guns?
May 8th, 2011 at 9:43pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Although our primary focus is on original and reproduction single-shot designs of the 19th and early 20th centuries, we also embrace all other single-shot rifles except bolt action types.


So, are 19th century Schuetzen bolt actions allowed? If so, where is the line drawn on bolt actions?
  

Karl
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11473
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #1 - May 8th, 2011 at 9:47pm
Print Post  
No bolt actions. No line.   

Joe.  Smiley
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11473
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #2 - May 8th, 2011 at 10:12pm
Print Post  
It's sorta like, no Sharps Borchardts in NRA BPCR silhouette matches. 

HUH?  Grin Grin   

But, rules are rules.   Cheesy

     Joe.    Smiley
  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KWK
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 402
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #3 - May 8th, 2011 at 10:53pm
Print Post  
My question was prompted by pictures of some original, 1800's German Schuetzen single shots, based on the 1871 Mauser and other actions, as shown in Rowe's Alte Scheibenwaffen. They're actually fairly attractive, as far as bolt guns go. Here we have genuine BP target rifles dating to before the Winchester single-shot, the Stevens 44.5, etc all banned. It's a curious position.

Most interesting are Rowe's comments that Aydts and Martinis left the bolt actions behind.
  

Karl
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
westerner
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


deleted posts and threads
record holder.

Posts: 11473
Location: Why, out West of course
Joined: May 29th, 2006
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #4 - May 8th, 2011 at 10:58pm
Print Post  
The bolt actions were not popular for some reason. Now look at the Werndl Schutzen rifles. Is it a bolt action or not?   Huh

            Joe.  Smiley

  

A blind squirrel runs into a tree every once in a while.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
40_Rod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


Extremism in the persuit
of accuracy is not a
vice

Posts: 4285
Location: Knoxville, TN
Joined: Apr 20th, 2004
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #5 - May 9th, 2011 at 8:04am
Print Post  
I know that to some the no bolt action rule makes little sense, I also know that there are examples of German Mauser schuetzens. however, the two oldest rules of the ASSRA are 1 no bolt actions and plain-bases lead bullets. The modern explanation is that opening up the rules to bolts would start an arms race that would never end. it starts with a 1900 Mauser and pretty soon someone shows up with a Stole Panda action. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

40 Rod
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7551
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #6 - May 9th, 2011 at 8:24am
Print Post  
You have to draw the line somewere

Boats

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KWK
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 402
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #7 - May 9th, 2011 at 11:13pm
Print Post  
40_Rod wrote on May 9th, 2011 at 8:04am:
the two oldest rules of the ASSRA are no bolt actions and plain-bases lead bullets. The modern explanation is that opening up the rules to bolts would start an arms race that would never end.


I don't follow. The plain base lead bullets rule makes some sense, and it effectively kills any arms race: you can only go so fast with plain lead bullets.

Besides, what bolt action of the era cost more than a Ballard or a Maynard to produce?

Just curious...
  

Karl
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
KWK
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 402
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #8 - May 9th, 2011 at 11:16pm
Print Post  
boats wrote on May 9th, 2011 at 8:24am:
You have to draw the line somewhere


Rifles sans magazines and of a type produced before WW-I?

Perhaps U.S. Schuetzen shooters never used bolt actions? I'm not that familiar with the history of Schuetzen in the U.S.

  

Karl
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Skalkaho
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 787
Location: Montana
Joined: Sep 29th, 2006
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #9 - May 10th, 2011 at 8:54am
Print Post  

You can shoot it in Cast Bullet Assn. Matches. Three Benchrest classes...plain base single shot ...bolt action ....and military style rifles. So here is a group that will permit your rifle to compete. Pete
  

May the Bullet Gods be with you.......
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KWK
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 402
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #10 - May 10th, 2011 at 5:37pm
Print Post  
Skalkaho wrote on May 10th, 2011 at 8:54am:
So here is a group that will permit your rifle to compete.


Just to be clear, I neither own nor desire a Schuetzen rifle built off a 71 Mauser or the like. Given how popular these were in Germany, I find it peculiar they are banned here.
  

Karl
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #11 - May 10th, 2011 at 6:36pm
Print Post  
Not to repeat it too often, the objective of ASSRA is to preserve and replicate what was done in the USA, and prior to WW1.   There weren't any bolt action Schuetzen rifles here.   What may have been done in Europe is outside the scope of the ASSRA mission.

  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MP
Ex Member


Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #12 - May 10th, 2011 at 6:47pm
Print Post  
uscra112 wrote on May 10th, 2011 at 6:36pm:
Not to repeat it too often, the objective of ASSRA is to preserve and replicate what was done in the USA, and prior to WW1.   There weren't any bolt action Schuetzen rifles here.   What may have been done in Europe is outside the scope of the ASSRA mission.


I would have to disagree what that!

100% made in the USA circa 1913 and it's a single-shot.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)




« Last Edit: May 10th, 2011 at 9:40pm by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KWK
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 402
Location: USA
Joined: Jul 12th, 2004
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #13 - May 10th, 2011 at 7:37pm
Print Post  
uscra112 wrote on May 10th, 2011 at 6:36pm:
the objective of ASSRA is to preserve and replicate what was done in the USA, and prior to WW1.


I understand that.

Quote:
There weren't any bolt action Schuetzen rifles here.


I wondered about that, in a post above. A quick glance though Ned Robert's book shows no mention of any bolts. Certainly, it was never a major contender. However, I suspect the blanket statement "there weren't any" will prove false. Given the large number of home grown bolt actions plus those available in Europe, I suspect someone will find written reference to them being used here at times.

Now, given MP's rifle, shall we rewrite the rules?  Smiley
  

Karl
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
uscra112
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4079
Location: Switzerland of Ohio
Joined: May 7th, 2007
Re: no bolt guns?
Reply #14 - May 10th, 2011 at 7:45pm
Print Post  
Quote:
Perhaps U.S. Schuetzen shooters never used bolt actions? I'm not that familiar with the history of Schuetzen in the U.S.


We are.  They didn't.

I'm going to invoke an experience of my youth here.  My moniker refers to my last racing number in the United States Classic Racing Association.  An organization devoted to the preservation and use of road racing motorcycles up to about 1967.  I was club champion in 250cc class in 1988.   I also raced a BSA DBD34 Goldstar that I built myself, (on a tight budget), to good effect.  That's my credentials.  Now, this sport was big in Europe, too.  A large mistake was made in Europe.   It is a fact that there was ONE Norton Manx built in the early '60s that had an automotive type plain-bearing crankshaft.  It was raced by none other than Mike Hailwood and cost a mint of money.   The mistake that was made in the '80s was to permit replicas of ANY make of engine to use a plain bearing crank, citing the Hailwood special as precedent.  So we started to see Goldstars and G50s with these cranks, and they had 25%+ horsepower advantage.   Trouble was, they still cost a mint of money, so the whole class became totally dominated by fat wallets.  (And I will tell you that the cheating that went on, due to these big money players insisting in winning at all costs, was pervasive.)  The ordinary sportsman owner/rider was completely shut out of the top placings.   

The ASSRA can deal with this unique bolt action that's been shown up in one of two ways. We can do like VSCCA in the USA, and permit ONLY documented originals, or we could permit replicas the way the vintage motorcycle clubs did.   Either way, the existing enthusiast of limited means will get shut out.  Documented originals cost the earth. If we allow replica bolt actions, based on ONE historical example, the bolts will take over the class and leave all the present enthusiasts shut out.   That will destroy the spirit of the club.   Q.E.D.  
« Last Edit: May 10th, 2011 at 8:28pm by uscra112 »  

<div class=
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
Send TopicPrint