singleshottom;
No offense taken! I'm happy to have civil conversation on disagreements!
Our experience obviously differs when it comes to national shooting organizations attending local matches.
Perhaps it is your writing style that leads me to think your approach was a negative one; if I have misinterpreted your meaning on ANY topic, I apologize.
You take issue with my comparison to NRA sports; that's fair.. it's not a perfect comparison by any means.
I don't take issue with people suggesting changes...
What I readily admit sets my teeth on edge is people who say they want "change", without suggesting specific changes to be made, and suggesting how a small association like ASSRA with a 12 person BOD could actually make those changes, and perhaps volunteering to coordinate those efforts.
Most of the rabble-rousing for change on the forum comes from people who either wish things to be done FOR them, or from those who cannot get over past difficulties (and don't get me wrong, some of those past issues are genuine and troubling! but they are
the past, when we should be focusing on where to go
from here).
You don't strike me as someone who falls into either of those categories.
Oh, and as for what I "know" about the NRA... I KNOW that they get as few CONSTRUCTIVE ideas from shooters coming in to the Competitive Shooting division as (apparently) come in to ASSRA.
Regional NRA reps are no more clairvoyant than 40 Rod claims to be
I'm going to throw out a general suggestion;
let's stop bitching about past injustices and focus, with
gentlemanly discussion, not just
where we want to go from here, but
how each of us can do our own part to get us there!
If you are no longer a member due to past slights, injustices, or disagreements, I can respect that.
Please ask yourself; "How does re-hashing this past incident move things
forward? "
If it does, it does... if it doesn't - can we try to? Please?