Schuetzendave wrote on Feb 17
th, 2011 at 6:35pm:
At the time we wanted targets the rule existed. Since we could not get targets we printed up our own supply. Eight years worth to make the printing economical; so we will not be able to support ASSRA through the purchase of targets now until about 2020.
That is what happens when you throw out restrictive practices; members go elsewhere. Unfortunately the harm has already been done even though it has since been resolved.
A fair point, sir...
Let me put forth some food for thought;
If grudges over past practices have no expiration date, why SHOULD the ASSRA change anything, ever?
Just as legitimate grievances SHOULD be voiced (a lot more politely than some other folks are doing), should not also people whose grievances HAVE, however belatedly, been addressed, not also eventually admit so?
I'm not saying everyone should "kiss and make up"... but it seems to me that over the last year, several of the issues most often cited by people as reasons for their dissatisfaction with the ASSRA have been addressed, most publicly so. Where is the acknowledgment?
Speaking more broadly; here we have a PROPOSAL... a very clear one.
Now wild accusations fly of "cutting non-members out of the forum"...
On the other side of course, we have folks with limited abilities to be civil as well, so there's room for improvement on both sides, I grant...
It makes me wonder; why would ANY member of the Board bother to solicit opinions on ideas for the Association if the replies are this sort of bitter vitriol (rather that schutzendave's very well thought out and polite discussion, I would add...)?
Were I on the Board, I would be inclined to ask myself "What purpose does this forum serve in furthering the goals of the ASSRA?".
with respect to all;
Paul F.