Lynn, Two schools of thought or at least two approaches to the 200 yard plain base lead bullet game have evolved over the years of modern competition. especially from the standpoint of the off-the-bench shooting---though offhand shooters have their own variation in orientation.
one group is more oriented to a more "traditional" approach, the other is more oriented to achieving the maximum potential accuracy ---minimum group size and or maximum scores. Actually its like two ends of a continuum with all shades and flavors along the line. most of us probably fall somewhere in the center portion.
A more traditional (though I hate to use the word) shooter might be more comfortable with a more traditional case design---in this case--no pun intended--the old historic 32-40 and its variations.
A more "progressive" shooter might want to take advantage of modern case design, powders, internal ballistics etc etc. The same kind of thought applies to choices of rifle configuration, actions, barrel lengths, stock designs, sight systems and all the rest of the shebang.
I'm not one to make a judgement, like I said I'm one of those middle section guys. NOW --- IF---I was a good enough shooter, maybe shooting in the middle 240s on a regular basis, I might be tempted to go a bit more "progressive" to win an occasional 250 match or two. However I've gotten sidetracked into the offhand side of the game and now I'm straining to try to break 200.