Page Index Toggle Pages: [1]  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) .45-70 / pyrodex (Read 20911 times)
c.robertson
Ex Member


.45-70 / pyrodex
Aug 6th, 2008 at 7:47pm
Print Post  
I am just starting to (try) loading pyrodex in the .45-70. It was my understanding that pyrodex was substitute for black powder and that the '70' was the amount of BP to cram into the case??

WELL!!  50gr of pyrodex fills the case to the point that there is not enough room for the 405gr cast bullet, and yes it is RS granulation.

What am I almost doing wrong. ??
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Jeff_Schultz
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1612
Location: Ransomville, NY
Joined: Apr 25th, 2004
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #1 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 8:16pm
Print Post  
Trying to use Pyrodex.
  

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo

“There is no situation so bad that it cannot be made worse."

  Confidence- The feeling you get before you fully understand the situation.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
13Echo
Ex Member


Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #2 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 8:25pm
Print Post  
Pyrodex is a volume for volume replacement for black powder.  It is considerably less dense.  I've never used Pyrodex so I really can't recommend a proper load.  You should also know that Pyrodex is actually more corrosive than black powder and will also react with any ammonia containing bore cleaner you might use to cause rust.  Try going to the Hodgdon web site and see what they list.

Jerry Liles
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
J.D.Steele
Ex Member


Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #3 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 8:25pm
Print Post  
step 1, use a long 24"-36" drop tube & trickle the powder 'til it reaches the top of the case, I promise it will be a lot more than 50 grs.

step 2, use a compression die to compress the powder ~0.300"-0.350" or just enough to fully & easily seat the bullet to the desired depth without further powder compression.

step 3, seat the bullet.

Please be advised that this is what works for black powder, I don't use no stinkin' Pyrodex but some folks get good results from it.
Good luck, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
c.robertson
Ex Member


Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #4 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 8:55pm
Print Post  
Thank y'all.   
I tried looking it up, but without success. Pyrodex is NOT going to be my main powder, just a short term experiment.

I put 50gr of that 'stinking'  Wink pyrodex under a 300gr cast bullet. This is just a 'gee whiz' thing to experience the smoke. Besides, 2 cans of the stuff only cost $20.00.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7573
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #5 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 9:02pm
Print Post  
I tried it n the 45/70 when it first came out,was a waste of time.   Average Joe muzzle loader hunting once a year perhaps, accuarcy from a cartridge rifle I did not have any luck

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #6 - Aug 6th, 2008 at 10:32pm
Print Post  
Works great in my .50 Cal CVA Side by side double rifle. Have tried some in my .45-70 Trapdoor and accuracy was ok for my informal targed practice. Less corosive than black in my experience and a little easier to clean up. Hot soap and water works just like black powder.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bent_Ramrod
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1467
Location: Southern Arizona
Joined: Feb 8th, 2006
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #7 - Aug 8th, 2008 at 9:22pm
Print Post  
My Garrett Sharps carbine likes 44 gr of Pyrodex CTG under the Ideal 457124, giving a little over 2-1/4" for 5 shots at 100 yards.  With the Lawrence sights on the thing, I thought that was pretty good.  I could shave this slightly by using 39 gr of Pyrodex CTG with 5 gr of Pyrodex RS on top of the main charge, under the same bullet.  The reverse (fine powder near the primer) wasn't as accurate.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
jhrosier
Ex Member


Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #8 - Aug 8th, 2008 at 9:27pm
Print Post  
I have used Hodgdon's Triple7 in cartridge guns with good results.
It is much easier to clean up than BP.
I tried Pyrodex in several muzzle loaders, with mostly indifferent results, so did not bother with it in cartridges.

Jack
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
irish66
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 536
Location: newbraunfels
Joined: Apr 7th, 2007
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #9 - Aug 9th, 2008 at 8:04am
Print Post  
I agree with jeff, I have shot bpcs since 1982 and have tried pyropuke. the stuff was made for front stuffers and is all but worthless in a cartridge.
swiss is a very good powder and it does not like a lot of compression, .030 and you can use either 2fg goex or cartridge goex. I recomend either spg for lack of any other reliable lube or make your own.
there is a lot of stuff available from buffalo arms skip and dave will be very helpful. especially to your credit card.
and dependinh on what you are shooting you might wnat to try a lyman 500 gr, or a lyman postell to get you started then go buy a real mold. like a hoch or a jones or a-------?
cheers 
irish
did not think this pic would load, but shot this and it repeats at 200 yards using goex and a jones mold on the nbsv range in my back 40. Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
singelshotman
Ex Member


Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #10 - Aug 9th, 2008 at 5:31pm
Print Post  
Just use a MAg Primer and compress it a lot, about .375"works fine.Have used it in a 38-55 Ballard and a 50-70 and a 40-50SS  Rolling Block and others
which are foreign to this board, military bolt actions.It must be heavily compressed to burn good, not like Black powder in that regard. I would never use Triple 777 in a Ballard as it been proven to be HOT Stuff. Black powder is sold in a Gun Store only three miles from here, but by local fire codes they can get only 25# at a time, so it sells out in a hurry.I could buy #5 at a time by mail, but that would`cost me over $100, try selling that to the wife when my 15year old daughter needs a pair of $250 glasses, she needs them in a week-back to school time.
The only bad thing about Pyrodex is it MUST BE CLEANED WITHIN 24 hours, with water, or your rifle may be ruined. I have ruined a 40-50 SS
Hepburn barrel by not cleaning soon  enough, so i've been there.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #11 - Aug 10th, 2008 at 12:11am
Print Post  
Have to disagree about Pyrodex destroying a rifle after 24 hours. Have left my CVA .50 Cal double rifle for a couple of days with no serious problem. I find it less corrosive than black powder. I DO NOT recomend leaving it set though. You should always clean immeidately whenever possible.

The comments about compressing Pyrodex did remind me of the problems I had when I first started using Pyrodex in my double barreled muzzle loader. If I did not firmly compress the load with the ramrod, the gun would not always go bang. Compress the load and no problem. I normaly use Tripple Seven for hunting now and it does seem to be hotter. It is supposed to generate higher velocities.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
13Echo
Ex Member


Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #12 - Aug 10th, 2008 at 10:31am
Print Post  
I have no actual experience with Pyrodex so most of my information comes from the Mad Monk, one of the leading experts on black powder and substitutes.  According to him one of the combustion products of Pyrodex is, I believe (I need to find my discs) sal ammoniac.  This is hygroscopic and will cause pitting corrosion of steel and, according to the Mad Monk, is much worse than the corrosion caused by quality black powder.  If you shoot pyrodex and the humidity is sufficient you will have problems if you wait to clean.  It is also supposedly particularly hard on brass. Additionally combustion products of Pyrodex will react with ammonia containing bore solvents to cause almost instant rust.   Finally, unlike quality black powder, Pyrodex will deteriorate with time.

Pyrodex is certainly a lot better than nothing and I would use it if it were all I could get but I would clean like a fiend after shooting.

My 2 cents.

Jerry Liles
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7573
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #13 - Aug 10th, 2008 at 12:14pm
Print Post  
Franky I never understood the "clean up" apeal of Pyrodex.  You need to clean a rifle after you shoot.  Black cleans just as easy as anything else. In fact it takes me less time to clean my 38/55 after a session with Black powder than it does to get the copper out of my Hunter class 7mm08 Silouette rifle. True the 38/55 had a good barrel and the Hunter class bolt gun is Remmington hammer forged 10 dollar barrel.

If you leave Pyrodex in a muzzleloader without cleaning it causes no end of   trouble. I know because on of my buddies left his fired with no cleaning deer season to next dear season, and brought the rifle to me to "fix"

So if it cleaning is no easier and it does not work as well, why use it.

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slumlord44
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 2850
Location: Lebanon, Illinois 62254
Joined: Dec 21st, 2007
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #14 - Aug 10th, 2008 at 10:14pm
Print Post  
If you use black powder and do not clean for a year you are also going to have a major problem. Use what works for you. I have been using some turn of the century Dupont black powder and it works great. Have had no problem with Pyrodex or Tripple Seven. I have heard that Pyrodex degrades over time. Got some real old Pyrodex that I bought cheap a few years ago. Need to try it to see how it works. One of the problems with black is that it is difficult to get in some areas because of shipping and storage regulations. I bought several pounds a few years ago when it was available. The only problem is that some areas have limits as to how much black powder you can store in your home and how it should be stored.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
irish66
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 536
Location: newbraunfels
Joined: Apr 7th, 2007
Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #15 - Aug 11th, 2008 at 7:20am
Print Post  
GUys,
the joke around here is that if my house ever catches fire there wll be a huge fire ball, and a crater!!!!!
We had a local gent show up to shoot a bpcs match a couple of years ago with a his favorite highwall, and boy he said that thing shot so good at100 with pyropuke. well 60 shots later he had not hit one animal not even the sighters, and we have not seenn him since.
yesterday I was helping a friend get ready for some long range match in nebraske, and he was shooting a couple of different slugs with 63 grs of swiss. in a typical so. tx shifty condititon he managed to shoot a 10 shot group that measured 1.25 vertical by 2 inches horizontal. he is supposed to send me a picture of the target and rifle so I will try to post when i get it.
so why bother with pyro puke? when black is original and it is better.
cheers
irish
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DavidVanVorous
Ex Member


Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #16 - Aug 12th, 2008 at 4:37pm
Print Post  
Ive messed with pyrodex a few times (ML  specifically not BPCR) and found it to be only "OK". Big problem I ran into was with compression variations causing some serious inconsistencies regardless of range. The biz about compression is what I fanllay tracked down to and later there was an article in a late '80s copy of MuzzleLoader magazine that also confirmed this suspicion as they found that most of the then available alternatives were very sensitive to compression or lack thereof in comparison to BP proper. The compression inconsitency and effect on accuracy why a little device called the Kadooty was developed and in fact tried in the article.  This widget was supposed to allow one to measure and apply a consistent compression of the powder (through the slug or ball)

As to pyrodex and its other issues, Im reminded of a ML pig hunting trip at  Ft.Hunter-Ligget in CA where a friend had a new Kodiak that he was using pyrodex in. At the end of the day we had to unload and used the typical CO2 unloaders, we hear a kerthwap! at a tree and in looking to see iffen the slug was still useable we find a perfectly formed to breech slug of  pyrodex the load...  Huh

The rifle had been loaded in the evening prior to the days hunt but left uncapped until we hit the field so it was exposed to no more than a 24 hr time at what ever the relative humidity was over night... Sorta said something to me and the others I was with. Next time out the Kodiak owner was using Goex 2f...  Wink 

D.

« Last Edit: Aug 12th, 2008 at 4:50pm by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BigOtto
Ex Member


Re: .45-70 / pyrodex
Reply #17 - Aug 18th, 2008 at 5:33am
Print Post  
I have not used pyrodex in cartridges. 
I have had a bit of experience with it in muzzleloaders.   
Caps and flints.
The good days have been low humidity, warm sunny days.   
You will needs a tranquil aura about you.   
Bluebirds singing. 
Bunnies frolicking.   
A disney like castle in the distance.
A unicorn or two standing around.   
A virgin with a fan, another feeding you grapes.
Perhaps a waterfall with a rainbow? ..............Way far away.

Otherwise, when it gets humid, you're screwed!
Rain...fugedaboudit! It aint goin off.
Snow....watch your flashpan brother!


If you gonna use the "propellants" you need an inline with shotgun primers.  Then it still might not work right.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 
Send TopicPrint