Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) A nice A Henry single (Read 6601 times)
Brent
Ex Member


A nice A Henry single
Jul 8th, 2008 at 2:12pm
Print Post  
This is a nice rifle.  Bit more than I can afford, but I know there are some fans of the English. 

There is an interesting asymmetrical step to the barrel profile that I've never seen or noticed before.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1687
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #1 - Jul 8th, 2008 at 3:57pm
Print Post  
I doubt very much that rear sight is the original one...  doesn't fit the rifle at all.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
J.D.Steele
Ex Member


Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #2 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 9:21am
Print Post  
Ditto the stock wood. Appears to be an 'el Cheapo' (no stalking safety) that's been restocked and reblued. Regards, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1687
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #3 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 12:20pm
Print Post  
Joe,

You're right - the buttstock shape is all wrong - not really AH style...
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #4 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 12:30pm
Print Post  
hmm, well right or wrong, I still like the rifle and if it is altered, it must have been a long time ago.  The wood is oil soaked near the action.   

I don't have any problem with reblued guns or refinished wood. I don't know why this is such a bug up most people's butts.  But I am happy for that bug as it puts the occasional rifle in my dream range if not my price range.

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
1878
Ex Member


Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #5 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 12:57pm
Print Post  
Ok Joe, what is a "stalking safety" and why does this rifle not having one make it less desirable?  It looks like a very pretty action to me!  The top down view with the action open makes that built up (or not machined down) area at the rear of the barrel look like a Rigby flat.  It looks completely different in the two side views, which is weird.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #6 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 1:08pm
Print Post  
I'll answer that - probably a little different than Joe.  

A stalking safety is the single biggest waste of time any English gunsmith ever spent in making a gun.  

Here is a picture of one of my rifles with a pair of the damn things... 
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)  That is a Joseph Lang double rifle (18 bore - about 635 caliber).

The sliding button infront of the hammer moves a tit back into a groove on the backside of the hammer locking it in place.  This only works at half cock.  So, as a "stalking" safety, you have to stalk to within range, then slide the safeties forward (making very audible clicks), then cock the hammers to full cock (more clicks and movements), and then aim and fire.  Meanwhile the buck is somewhere in Nebraska halfway to Wyoming....  Not a lot of help if you have an Iowa tag in your pocket.  I know this for an empirical fact.

If they worked on full cock, I could see some sense in them.  At half cock, they are really just a PITA.  I would not pay a dime for them.  

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
hst
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 569
Joined: Jun 3rd, 2004
Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #7 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 4:38pm
Print Post  
Here is a picture of a stalking safety on a Henry. The purpose of the safety is to lock the hammer at half cock so that whilst one is crawling through the heather in stealthy pursuit of one's unsuspecting quarry, one does not snag said hammer on said heather, pull it back out of the half cock bent and then release said hammer to fall to the firing pin, creating an uncalled for commotion which would most likely alert one's unsuspecting prey and potentially draw blood from innocent bystanders. This is bad form, don't you know.

In that there is little heather in Iowa I can see that such a safety could be considered superfluous there...

Glenn

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
J.D.Steele
Ex Member


Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #8 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 4:46pm
Print Post  
Brent is largely correct in his description and opinion. The original purpose of the stalking safety, as I understand it, was to prevent ADs caused by snagging the hammer spur on vegetation. I've seen them most commonly made to engage at the half-cock position although I remember seeing one that engaged at the full-cock. They were fairly common in the UK (and even on the Continent) at one period on the finer examples of hammer rifles, but were never used in the US to any degree.

The rifle pictured has a simple transverse round pin as the only visible portion of the forearm attachment. This simple pin with no escutcheons around the ends is the standard Henry attachment for his less expensive models, but I've seen several higher-grade Henry and Fraser rifles with actual oblong keys and escutcheons, engraved of course. The unadorned round pin is deceptively simple; it's tapered, tightly fitted & hardened and holds the forearm very firmly indeed in the original rifles I've examined. The simple round pin attachment together with the lack of a stalking safety and the lack of engraving are the reasons I believe it's an el Cheapo.

Relatively speaking, of course.

We must always remember that Fraser and Henry didn't make cheap products. Yes, some were less expensive than others but this was primarily a function of their adornment rather than any difference in the basic quality of the workmanship or materials. Every single original example of both Fraser's and Henry's rifles that I've ever examined has been worthy of the 'Best' label, at least IMO they were, whether they had full-coverage bank-note engraving & gold inlays or none at all. Now, I haven't done up-close-&-personal-disassembly on more than 4 but have closely examined & manipulated about a dozen more of Thad Scott's and Clarence the Collector's rifles and that's my basis of opinion. I wish I could afford one. Heck, I wish I could build one half as good!
Regards, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fallingblock
ASSRA Board Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 634
Location: Wisconsin
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #9 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 5:46pm
Print Post  
This rifle does appear to be marked AHenry on the lock but most would also be marked on barrel. It does have what looks like an APU
# Action Patent Use # but it looks stamped and all I can recall are engraved.
The rear sight looks very close to correct for a plane rifle and may be correct.
The for-end on a plane rifle would be rounded but could be correct as then makers did what the customer wanted. 
Look at Winfer's book and Alexander Henry and you can see it is hard to make any hard and fast rules as to what is correct.
All of the Alex Henry rifles even those made for Australia as Military rifles by BSA Braendlin and others are still very nice 
Cheers,
Laurie
  

Cheers,
Laurie
ASSRA Secretary & Archivist
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bad_Ass_Wallace
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 150
Location: Kingaroy, Australia
Joined: Jul 29th, 2005
Re: A nice A Henry single
Reply #10 - Jul 9th, 2008 at 6:43pm
Print Post  
fallingblock wrote on Jul 9th, 2008 at 5:46pm:
All of the Alex Henry rifles even those made for Australia as Military rifles by BSA Braendlin and others are still very nice

I note that it is a RH hammer rather than the LF version that I recently aquired. Strange that it carries no date or makers name on either side.

I've fired about 20 rounds through mine and it shoots very well and surprisingly not too harsh in the recoil department.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  

Hold still varmint; while I plugs yer!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint