Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2  Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Powder explosions (Read 7852 times)
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7652
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Powder explosions
May 16th, 2008 at 5:05pm
Print Post  
I see someone has posted the black powder explosion test again.  While one person ran one test and it's repeated often on the Internet powder and suspended material fires are real and very dangerous.  It's NOT a myth.

I know the range mentioned below and have shot in it before. The bay that exploded holds 6 shooters, suspended material could only have come from those 6 shooters with pistols in an area 25 yards long by about  30 feet wide. & 10 feet high. The bays have  forced air ventilation that may or may not have been operating at the time. While the place is not well run the problem is one that could happen in other places through ignorance of potential danger. 

Point is a lot of cubic feet and very little suspended material caused a serious situation.  While not in the news article local officials have speculated unburned powder in the air put the danger level over the top.

Loading a single case full of black powder to my knowledge has not been proven to be dangerous.  Somewhere between that single case full of black and 6 shooters on an indoor range using smokeless there is a danger line.  

Watch the guy who tried to ignite black powder with a spark on the internet, be real carefull when handling powder yourself. He did not duplicate the potentialy dangerious conditon. A pile of sold materal is  not the same as suspended dust.

Boats


The Virginian-Pilot
© May 13, 2008 
VIRGINIA BEACH

The fire that ripped through an indoor shooting range Sunday, injuring seven people, is the latest in a string of problems at the facility.

In the past year, A&P Arms' Lynnhaven Shooting Range has been cited for worker safety violations; had a former manager sent to prison for stealing, selling and giving away guns; and has its license under investigation by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Sunday's fire, which is under investigation, was the third at the business in the past 15 years, fire officials said.

Four of the injured are hospitalized but are doing better, Battalion Chief Leon Dextradeur said.

"They are all upright and talking and have different levels of burn injuries, but none appears to be critical at this time," he said.

A&P Arms is owned by Shooting Sports Distributors Inc. The president of the company is Norman Gladden Jr., according to state records. He did not respond to voice messages Monday on his cell phone and at the store.

A message on the store's answering machine said, "We are temporarily closed and will reopen as soon as possible."

The fire started in one of the store's three shooting lanes and ignited a wood divider that separates them, Dextradeur said.

"With the backing they use to catch the bullets, you'll get lead and other debris that will back up there," said Mike Campbell, spokesman for the ATF. "Depending on their cleaning method, you may get a spark that will start a fire.

"I don't know if there was material that hadn't been cleared out or what. That appears to be what happened at Woodbridge and maybe happened here," Campbell said.

In March 2007, a fire engulfed Shooter's Paradise, a gun store and firing range in Woodbridge in Northern Virginia. No one was injured.

In 1994, an explosion sparked a fire at the A&P shooting range. No one was hurt. An accumulation of chemicals may have caused that fire, officials said at the time.

In June, A&P Arms was fined $1,740 after being cited for five violations by the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The violations were for "lead, inorganic fumes and dusts" and employee exposure to sodium hydroxide.

Last month, a former store manager was sentenced to 15 months for stealing firearms, including a submachine gun. ATF agents identified 51 guns that Marcus A. McCall sold, gave away or kept in his Virginia Beach home, according to court records. McCall worked at the A&P Arms store in Hampton, but often transported guns to the Virginia Beach store, court records showed.

The store's ATF license is under review, confirmed Campbell. He said the investigation is not related to Sunday's fire but declined to give details.

Aaron Applegate, (757) 222-5122, aaron.applegate@pilotonline.com




  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1720
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #1 - May 16th, 2008 at 5:32pm
Print Post  
Dust explosions - and they can and will happen with any type of dust, including seemingly innocent stuff like flour, pudding powder - whatever.  It just needs the right concentration, and a source of ignition to make it happen.
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #2 - May 17th, 2008 at 8:48am
Print Post  
Dust explosions are a far different thing than solid material explosions. As mentioned just about any dust particle can be exploded. An example would be a friend of mine who was welding 14 ft. down in the bottom of a grain elevator when it blew off. With the resulting fire he was lucky to get out of there alive. Even after several hours of forced ventilation the mishap still occurred.

  Talking to a local fire fighter friend about powder being set off in a fire, he said their biggest concern was all those primers laying around the loading room. Don't know if he even thought of the possibility of BP.

  Often wondered if the can BP comes in was tight enuf to cause an explosion if heated to the cooking off point.

  Another thing that's always had me wondering. If the danger of static electricity was so great in connection with BP how come most of it is shipped in steel cans. It would seem to me that if static was such a danger with BP steel cans would be the last thing they would ship the stuff in.

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartiniBelgian
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1720
Location: Aarschot
Joined: Jun 7th, 2004
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #3 - May 17th, 2008 at 5:21pm
Print Post  
BP in a can is probably less violent in a fire than the jerrycan full of petrol (gasoline) for the lawnmower...  But I agree with your firefirghter friend, primers are extemely violent and much more powerful than they seem, and when a pack of 1,000 will ignite in a fire, I wouldn't want to be anywhere near.
And the risk of dust explosions in grain elevators is so well documented (as are the destructions caused by them) - your welder firen was very lucky to escape alive.  Sometimes a dust explosion will cause a chain reaction - the pressure wave of the 1st one will lift more dust, causing it to trigger too, and so on...
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
RJM
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 212
Location: State of Confusion
Joined: Oct 15th, 2006
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #4 - May 18th, 2008 at 7:27am
Print Post  
They were shooting black powder indoors! Everyone knows the smoking section is outside.

Other than a saloon in Dodge City in the 1880, have others been doing this these days?
Regards, Ron
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
QuestionableMaynard8130
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 4144
Location: Benton  Harbor MI
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #5 - May 18th, 2008 at 8:55am
Print Post  
the story is really garbled and illogical---typical newsreporter reaction to any firearms-related news item.   First it talks about an explosion  with guys getting burned, then about a fire, then about an earlier fire in accuumlated backstop junk, OSHA violations that probably had nothing to do with any of the previous, likwise the employee doing illeagle guns sales.  Kind of an over-ripe fruitsalad of a story.  The fire department report would be a lot more interesting and valid.

It's hard for me to make sense of it as reported.  I can't see smokeless pistol cartridges putting enough unburned powder out the muzzle to create a sparkable condition---or we'd be hearing about a lot more of these things.   they tend to muzzle flash off with each round and even 6 at a time banging away at a time with full autos would not create an explosion.
MAYBE half a dozen SAS-type shooters rapidfiring blackpowder cartridge revolvers with overcharges of finegrain BP MIGHT possibly throw enough unburned powder out ahead of the firing line to set off a flashable situation---If they'd been at it for a while.  IF the place had sloppy housekeeping, which the story seems to imply, maybe other crappe' could have then caught.   But it still seems kind of far fetched.
  

sacred cows make the best burger
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
J.D.Steele
Ex Member


Re: Powder explosions
Reply #6 - May 18th, 2008 at 9:49am
Print Post  
A few years ago I read a story about the construction of a shooting baffle, to mitigate the noise. The baffle box was constructed of plywood sheets and had dimensions of ~ 4'x4'x8' with holes in both ends and was lined with roll insulation batting. The noise reduction was effective, however the accumulated unburned (smokeless rifle) powder eventually ignited and significantly altered the shape of the baffle box. Didn't blow it completely up but did require that it be strengthened when reassembled. This was printed in a national magazine but CRS has me firmly in its grip & I don't remember which one.
FYI, good luck, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fineredmist
Ex Member


Re: Powder explosions
Reply #7 - May 18th, 2008 at 10:06am
Print Post  
Tenex, to answer your question regarding BP in metal cans; the powder in a metal can will not generate a static charge as the metal container will conduct any charge to ground before it will become a problem. BP, smokeless or any other powder will "cling" to and generate a static charge in a plastic container. In the good old days BP was shipped in wood barrels and in lead containers to eliminate the problem of static charges. The lead containers also provided the material to cast the bullets the soldiers would use.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
mriisj assra Life
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 148
Location: Copenhagen
Joined: Dec 11th, 2007
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #8 - May 18th, 2008 at 1:53pm
Print Post  
All electronic components are today packed in antistatic plastic bags, I wonder if the Swiss powder plastic container is made of antistatic plastic to, and why the manufactors of powder measures dont use this materials, maybe they then have more products to sell.

Michael
  
Back to top
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #9 - May 18th, 2008 at 4:44pm
Print Post  
fineredmist,

  Thanks for the info. Wasn't aware that metal cans would automatically conduct any static to ground.

mriisj,

  Swiss plastic powder cans are marked with a triangle made up of arrows and inside are the letters 02. Just below the triangle are the letters PE-HD, and to the right is a big letter 1. Above are the makers name, I assume, RP Finland.

  Possibly this could give those in the know enuf info to tell us if this is anti-static material or not. I assume it is, but you know where assuming gets you! 

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
13Echo
Ex Member


Re: Powder explosions
Reply #10 - May 18th, 2008 at 8:46pm
Print Post  
TenX,
That's High density Polyethylene.  It is not antistatic.  Elephant used to use similar plastic bottles.

As for the shipping of BP in wood casks and lead containers in the "Good Old Days", it wasn't to eliminate static, it's because that's what they had.  No plastics then.

Jerry Liles
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7652
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #11 - May 18th, 2008 at 10:33pm
Print Post  
The paper is anti gun and the article is confused.  However the range did have a flash fire with extensive damage and injury.  I saw the damage from there last explosion. Knocked out the whole cinder block back wall.  Friend of mine on the fire department said speculation this time is lack of ventilation mixed with unburned smokeless powder in the air ignited when something sparked. They think either the target carriers motors range light bulbs or ventilation fans cutting on was the source of ignition.

This accident has nothing to do with loading a case full of black powder at home or at the range.  The lesson though is a very small amount of airborne powder dust can be very dangerous.  When we transfer larger quantities of powder container to container or into a powder measure the risk is real. Best pratice is small quantities,  no extra powder around the loading bench, good ventilation, and keeping possible ignition sources away. Unlikely sources can ignite, blown light bulb, fans etc.

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DoubleD
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 726
Location: Edmond
Joined: Feb 14th, 2006
Re: Powder explosions
Reply #12 - May 19th, 2008 at 9:41am
Print Post  
Glock had a similar accident in their shooting tunnel several years ago that injured three people.  It was reported that the fire was was started when a spark from shooting ignited accumulated unburned powder down range.

I know that one indoor range I trained on had a mandatory sweep down after each training session. You would be surprised how much powder residue was swept up.
  

Douglas, Ret.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wildbill
Ex Member


Re: Powder explosions
Reply #13 - May 21st, 2008 at 10:36am
Print Post  
Quote:
A few years ago I read a story about the construction of a shooting baffle, to mitigate the noise. The baffle box was constructed of plywood sheets and had dimensions of ~ 4'x4'x8' with holes in both ends and was lined with roll insulation batting. The noise reduction was effective, however the accumulated unburned (smokeless rifle) powder eventually ignited and significantly altered the shape of the baffle box. Didn't blow it completely up but did require that it be strengthened when reassembled. This was printed in a national magazine but CRS has me firmly in its grip & I don't remember which one.
FYI, good luck, Joe

JD, now you have my attention. After moving out here to Oregon and joining the local gun club, I noticed the bench rests had noise suppresion barrels to shoot through. There are a couple open benches for black powder firing as it is strictly forbidden to shoot black through the barrels. These are two 55 gallon drums welded together end to end, and rectangular holes cut through the ends to facilitate firing and sighting. The club is of the opinion that residual smokeless powder won't ignite, but the unburned black powder will. I know there is the potential for the black to go poof, but now the smoleless sounds like it could be an issue as well. I'd hate to be the guy touching one off and have a bunch of hot gas come back on my hat rack.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
J.D.Steele
Ex Member


Re: Powder explosions
Reply #14 - May 21st, 2008 at 12:45pm
Print Post  
Bill, I wouldn't be too worried about an outdoor structure that would admit rainwater into its interior. The baffle box I cited was installed indoors and IMO rainwater would eliminate the worry, IF it had good access to the powder remainder.

But you can inform your members that unburned smokeless powder accumulations will most certainly ignite, with sometimes spectacular results. The baffle box cited was much larger and constructed of wood, and bulged & separated significantly upon the powder ignition, thus sparing the shooter much of the potential backblast. I, for one, would hate to be on the receiving end of a powder blast contained by steel drums with no relief holes in them!
Good luck, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 
Send TopicPrint