As the particular person who brought that idea up on here a coupla years ago, and got his butt burned for it...... The answer right now is NO!!
If they do become allowed in the future I'm not sure they will help a whole lot with the rifles we use. Gun design is working against us.
Some people seem to have the idea that a Tuner will turn bad ammo into good ammo. Far from it.
What a Tuner does is take good ammo and "smooth" out the accuracy level from lot to lot which is the big bug-a-boo of .22 ammo. Of course "bad" ammo will be improved, but there's no way you can take 2" ammo and make it shoot into 1". I know, I've had lots that shot like a house afire, and the very next lot was so-so. Even with the high priced stuff.
As I get the picture even when made on a dedicated machine the quality cycles like a wave graph. So as the machine goes along the accuracy potential rises and falls. Part of the price you pay is a constant testing on the cartridges coming off that machine, and when the accuracy level drops off then that ammo is shunted to one side until the level returns to spec.'s. The first thing that comes to mind is what is the acceptable accuracy spread, how often do they test, and how many sub standard rounds get thru before they shunt the cartridges off. From descriptions I've read those machines spit out ammo like a stream of water.
This is supposedly where the Tuner comes in.
A while back Precision Shooting reported that some experimenting is going on now with the jacketed bench shooters to see if there's any benefit for them.
PETE