Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Postal Matches (Read 37198 times)
marlinguy
Ex Member
*****


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Re: Postal Matches
Reply #45 - Mar 15th, 2008 at 6:11pm
Print Post  
Jim, if you live "in the real world", then you know that if a guy is going to cheat, then witness signatures mean nothing. A cheater would just sign two fictitious names, or have two of his cheatin' buddies sign the target.
To assume everyone is a cheater is like the cop who thinks everyone is guilty until they prove they are innocent. I think the group of gentlemen here are above average, and I'd like to think there are very few cheaters among the ASSRA shooters.
But maybe I'm naive.-Vall
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Shooter_1
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #46 - Mar 15th, 2008 at 7:40pm
Print Post  
I think that's what Jim is saying, we're all Guilty till proven Innocent. I didn't  think that was the American way of doing things.
Shooter
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #47 - Mar 15th, 2008 at 7:43pm
Print Post  
Jim is just telling you what he thinks of ya'll.  I don't believe that it has to be that way through out the ASSRA, but a handful of people at the top make damn sure you know your place.   

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Shooter_1
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #48 - Mar 15th, 2008 at 8:02pm
Print Post  

I did NOT say you had to be a member of a club in order to shoot the WSU league. You seem to have a fixation on this point, as you've mentioned it a coupla times now. 

tenx, 
this is how I read what you wrote:
The WSU is set up so that in order to join them "you have to form a club". The WSU League on the other hand allows anyone to shoot as long as they can get up a "three man team".
Sorry if I mis-interrupted what you wrote.

Brent cane back with:
"ANYONE can shoot in the WSU Winter League Postal or the NRC bench matches.  All you have to be a member of is the human race.  You don't have to be part of a WSU club or anything".

Nothing in his post about being a member of a three man team, only being a member of  the human race
I guess it was easer for me to understand the post written by Brent.

  Again Sorry.

I've also told you that the rule book is WAY out of date. Please look at when the last revision date was. 

Yes, you did tell me that the rule book is way out of date, the one I have is dated 2002, and I was told that it is the current rule book in use at this time. 

Again, sorry if I was told wrong on this but I'm just a poor old country boy and  don't know no better.
  Shooter
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: Postal Matches
Reply #49 - Mar 15th, 2008 at 11:00pm
Print Post  
Shooter,

The revision of the rule book you mention is the latest update. That's why I said it was out of date. Maybe you and I are not on the same page. Anything 6 years old is out of date in this day and age.

  If I get a past post on here correctly they will soon be issuing a new update.

  What I said about the WSU and the League are correct. If you want to join the WSU you have to do so as a member of a club.

  You do not have to be a member of any organization to shoot the WSU Winter League. It is open to all comers.

  The only requirement is that you form a 3 man team to shoot it since it is a team event. This team can be made up of any human being that resides on this planet.

  Really. I wish you'd get on the WSU web site and look this all up. When you have done so then we can talk in a sane manner. Really... I think all you're trying to do is start an argument on here. I only have an 8th grade education but I'm getting what's said.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Shooter_1
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #50 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 12:03am
Print Post  

tenx,
Sorry you feel and think the way you do. We were just not on the same page, now it's evident that your talking about a 3 man team event and I was talking about individual shooting events. 

As far as me going to WSU site, I just cant look at and check out all the shooting associations on the internet, my poor old eyes just cant take it, there's the NRA, ISSA, WSU, CBA, ASSRA, and I don't want to even think what other ones there are that I may not know about.  I choose to put my efforts and time that I have into ASSRA, that's why I joined it and not some of the other ones and being that this is the ASSRA site that's what I am trying to learn about and concentrate on.

I could care less what some other Associations are doing at this time or how much better they may be than ASSRA, maybe after I get a year or so under my belt I'll give the other ones a look but right now ASSRA is all I can handle.

Sorry that you think all I'm trying to do is start an argument, you are way off base on that statement, and it's almost insulting,  all I'm trying to do is learn about what is going on in the ASSRA, the shooting events, the rules, etc. that's the Association I joined and that's where my interest is at this time.
Shooter
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KAF
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #51 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 6:35am
Print Post  
The rule book of the ASSRA has been under scrutiny.  A couple of rules committees have been going to suggest changes for a couple years, just nothing has been done yet.

Sometimes thing run slower than we'd like.

Some of the suggestions I have seen help clear up many of the rules, and some of the older rules removed.

Hopefully they can be finalized soon.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Cat_Whisperer
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


No 1, 9.3x74R

Posts: 3953
Location: Mountains of Virginia
Joined: Apr 17th, 2004
Re: Postal Matches
Reply #52 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 8:26am
Print Post  
Network and Internet communication tends to get abrasive from time to time - it's  the nature of the beast as it's too easy to misinterpret what the meaning and intent of the message is.

HAVING said that, I hope that y'all take our comments as constructive and that SOME of the input gets into the new rule book.  I hope that the rules are generally INCLUSIVE of new ideas while preserving the original intent and character of the organization.

THANKS!

  

Cat Whisperer (trk)
Chief of Smoke
Pulaski Coehorn Works and Skunk Works
Drafted May 1970, Retired Maj. U.S.Army
assra #9885
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: Postal Matches
Reply #53 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 8:42am
Print Post  
Shooter,

  You're sorry I feel and think the way I do?!? How condescending of you Sir.

  Of course you can subscribe to any Forum you like. But if you wish to talk intelligently on a subject it behooves you to at least get the other side of the issue.

  There is nothing complicated about the WSU's web site and it's very easy to find the info I suggested. If you can't find it let me know and I'll post a point and click entry to that info.

  I gather then that you didn't "point & click" the address to Brent's web site I posted so you could see how the WSU Winter League was set up? It would have showed you immediately that it was a three person league spread out over 10 weeks, with the scores for each team, and each individual score, the teams overall ranking at any given point, plus a list of those who had shot 250's. Plus some stuff I'm sure I've forgotten offhand.

  I gather from your comments that you think all other organizations think they are better than the ASSRA. I would disagree with that. I don't know why those who formed the ISSA split off from the ASSRA, but the WSU has nothing against the ASSRA. In fact I, and many others belong to both. If you'd look them over you'd find they mostly complement each other. About the only difference is that the WSU wants to hold to a more rigid interpretation of how it was done in the "Golden Age" of Schuetzen. Kind of like the difference between NCOWS and SASS. Nothing wrong with either, and you can pick the one that suits you the best.

  Personally I think the WSU has shot themselves in the foot by going to being a strictly offhand organization. But, I ain't on the BoD so I'll show my displeasure by letting my feet do the talking. I don't necessarily agree with  how the ASSRA handles some things but they fit my way of thinking better.

  I haven't got a clue about the ISSA.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
digitall423
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 747
Location: Mexico Beach, FL
Joined: Aug 5th, 2005
Re: Postal Matches
Reply #54 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 9:25am
Print Post  
KAF

From your post I assume that the proposed benchrest postal matches will be .22 only. Why not have centerfire benchrest postals? 

Bill
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
matt_carter
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #55 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 9:56am
Print Post  
This has been an interesting and some what "bumpy" thread. 
I've shot ASSRA postal matches in the past and would like to shoot in them again. If things get lined out and going, I'll participate.
I enjoy the shooting I don't enter matches based on the "prize pool". I like most, attempt to shoot "possibles" one hole in the center of the 25 ring. In the end it all comes down the individual effort. If you cheat your cheating yourself first and foremost. 
In the end when it's all over and you get a trinket for your dishonest effort, was the trinket worth it?
I think not.
I believe that the folks here in this "brother hood" have much greater self respect. 
Hopefully things can get rolling and we can spend our time on the range making holes in the 25 ring instead of typing on this darn thread.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
KAF
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #56 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 11:15am
Print Post  
I am hoping for CF bench and 22 bench postal matches.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Shooter_1
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #57 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 12:18pm
Print Post  
tenx,

I did not intend my comment to be condescending, if that's what you thought it was, well I guess that's the way you think, so be it,  As far as me talking intelligently on a subject, sorry I cant do that very well because I'm still learning all this stuff about ASSRA, bottom line, I'm NOT INTERESTED in the other side of any "issues" unless there ASSRA issues. I tried to make it clear that I'm trying to learn as much about the association "I joined".  Now, is there any part of this that you don't  understand ?.

 "I gather from your comments that you think all other organizations think they are better than the ASSRA."

 I have no idea what your talking about, I don't know anything about the other associations to make any comments about them, I only know what you and some others have said about them on this ASSRA site, and like I've already said I have NO INTEREST in them, I am a ASSRA member, not a member of  WSU or any others. 

 Are you following me so far, If I'm typing to fast for you to understand what I'm saying I'll try to slow it down a bit. OK maybe that comment was not called for but I'm trying to make my point as simple as I can.

You gather that I didn't "point & click" the address to Brent's web site, you gathered correct, I'm NOT INTERESTED. If it has nothing to do with ASSRA. 

I can only do one association at a time, and at this time it's ASSRA. I see that your not happy with the way WSU is doing things, I could care less about what there doing, if in you think they shot themselves in the foot, don't waste your time telling me about it, I don't care, go tell someone that does.

Your saying something about the difference between NCOWS and SASS. and that there's nothing wrong with either, and to pick the one that suits me best, I don't know what those associations are and I don't want to know, I already picked the association that I think suits me best, I joined the ASSRA. 

  Are you "getting" this.

"I don't necessarily agree with  how the ASSRA handles some things but they fit my way of thinking better"

I'm so happy for you that ASSRA fits your way of "thinking", maybe with all your experience you could step up to the plate and "help" ASSRA with any thing you don't, as you said, "necessarily agree with" but please try to help within the polices of the ASSRA, not force your way of "thinking" on the ASSRA just because you and possibly only you or just a few others "think" your correct. It cant always be your way or no way, that's the way dictators think.

I see your still on the rule book thing,  in one of your post, in the same breath, I think,  your saying that the revision I have is the "latest update", then your saying that it's out of date ?, again I guess we are not on the same page. 

Please educate me, when does a "rule book" become out of date, how long does it take ? one year, two years, ?. I've been told by someone that should know that the book I have is the current one and it's the "only" one "in use" at this time, therefore I would think it's "in date" and will stay "in date"  till another revision comes out. 

 This came from one of the ASSRA officials, not just some guy on this forum, then again maybe I mis-understood what he said. 

This is starting to get a bit childish, dumb, and stupid. I can see from reading some of the messages that there are some guys that cause problems for ASSRA and are disrespectful to other members. lets try an put our efforts into making the ASSRA better for all the members, not just a few. 
 Shooter
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
tenx
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 385
Joined: Feb 23rd, 2008
Re: Postal Matches
Reply #58 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 2:14pm
Print Post  
Shooter,

   Whatever you say!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Shooter_1
Ex Member


Re: Postal Matches
Reply #59 - Mar 16th, 2008 at 2:52pm
Print Post  
tenx,
Thank You for understanding.
Shooter
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7
Send TopicPrint