Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6 Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti (Read 38640 times)
TonyT
Ex Member


Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Nov 13th, 2006 at 3:00pm
Print Post  
I had belived that the original octagon top actions were all of the "thick side" variety. I had a Special sporting in the 14000 serial range with a round top thick side action. A local gunsmith has an octagon tope THIN side action with serial 900. I had always believed that the thick sdie actions preceeded the thin side actions.
Can anyone shed additional light on the subject?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gaintwist
Participating Member
*
Offline



Posts: 11
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Joined: Jan 27th, 2005
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  act
Reply #1 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 3:32pm
Print Post  
Tony,
  I was lucky enough to rescue Highwall #1XX from a varmit conversion back 20 yrs ago. It is a thick side octagon top.
cheers,
-lige
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Quarter_Bore
Oldtimer
*****
Offline



Posts: 817
Location:   
Joined: Dec 16th, 2005
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #2 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 5:12pm
Print Post  
I had a thin side octagon top.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
blackpowdermax
Ex Member


Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #3 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 9:43pm
Print Post  
I have a thickside Hiwall in 40-70 Ballard made in 1893.  Bert Hartman mentioned that he has seen thickside Hiwalls from serial # 50 to serial # 131XXX.  He said most were early but they show up at random later, almost all in large calibers.

max
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Ex Member
*****


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #4 - Nov 13th, 2006 at 10:47pm
Print Post  
I have a thin side special sporting rifle, with small swiss buttplate in serial number range 2xxx. It also has the octagon top, and earliest style ebony inlay in the pistol grip. 
I think I read in Campbell's book that thick side actions, and also octagon tops were found throughout quite a few years of production. Mostly early, but not all in the first years.

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
J.D.Steele
Ex Member


Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #5 - Nov 14th, 2006 at 1:11am
Print Post  
I have owned both thick-side and thin-side octagon-top high walls, and both were very early. The thickside had the cross-pin FP retainer. IMO the thin-side is better-looking & it's my impression that it's rarer also.
Regards, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FITZ
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


REGARDS

Posts: 917
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #6 - Nov 14th, 2006 at 5:56pm
Print Post  
Tony, I have a early Thin Side Octagon top Hiwall. It was in .222 Rem. when I found it. Spring loaded extractor never worked well. So I decided to rebarrel it in some more conventional Caliber. Ended up a 14" twist 30-30. To my suprise the Barrel shank size was Lowall size. 
Serial number 800. I also have a Thickside Octagon top action but it has the large standard Barrel shank size, and it is a four didgit serial #. I have read somehwere, Cambpell maybe? That these early small shank actions were in small calibers. Do knw there is some thought that the early small shank actions should not be barreled in large caliber shells as the wall thickness of the barrel is thin at the shank. I suppose that might have been an issue when the barrel steel was soft and mild. But the .222 with small shank took some fairly high pressure hot loads when I was working at shooting it out. I also have put some hot jacketed 30-30 loads thru it with the Douglas barrel with no problems. I suspect that during the first year or two of production there were a lot of what would later be considered non standard versions leaving the factory. Regards, FITZ.
  

FITZ
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TonyT
Ex Member


Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #7 - Nov 14th, 2006 at 8:55pm
Print Post  
Fitz,
I forgot to mention that #909 also has a lo wall size small shank barrel. According to the Cody museum it was originally barreled in 32 WCF.
Tony
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
marlinguy
Ex Member
*****


Ballards may be weaker,
but they sure are neater!

Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #8 - Nov 14th, 2006 at 9:01pm
Print Post  
Quote:
I have owned both thick-side and thin-side octagon-top high walls, and both were very early. The thickside had the cross-pin FP retainer. IMO the thin-side is better-looking & it's my impression that it's rarer also.
Regards, Joe


Joe, 
Mine also has the crosspin firing pin retaiiner, instead of screw.
  
(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bert_H.
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 145
Location: Kingston
Joined: May 13th, 2004
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #9 - Jan 3rd, 2007 at 10:29am
Print Post  
Hello all,

A very interesting topic, and one that I have studied & researched to some degree.

To clarify some of the impressions and assumptions made by several of the previous respondents, the following statistical information was take directly from by research database:

There are numerous variations of the high-wall frame, but I will simplify it into four (4) basic styles; (the number after the first three frame types is the total number of each that I have personally confirmed).

1. Thick-side frame w/octagon receiver ring (15), all serial numbers are below 5800 except (1) rifle 74492.

2. Thick-side frame w/round receiver ring (41), one of which is also a Takedown. Serial numbers run from 142 - 131043.

3. Thin-side frame w/octagon receiver ring (24), all serial numbers are below 3300 except (1) rifle 92995.

4. Thin-side frame w/round receiver ring (50K+)

It appears that you fellows either own or know of several specimens that I have not yet recorded. For those that would like to help with my continuing research and/or participate in a survey, please contact me at Win1885@msn.com.

Regards,
Bert Hartman

  

Real Men own and shoot a WINCHESTER Single Shot!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bert_H.
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 145
Location: Kingston
Joined: May 13th, 2004
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #10 - Jan 3rd, 2007 at 1:37pm
Print Post  
Hello Dave,

I do not have your high-wall's serial number in my database yet, and I would very much like to know what the complete serial number is (you can email it to me if you are concerned about privacy). 

Your response got me to thinking that it might be helpful for me to post all of the serial numbers I currently have in my database so that everyone can see which ones I already have... so here they are by frame type:

Thick-side w/octagon receiver ring

50
160
214
265
337
1380
1749
1849
2298
2307
2375
2494
3994
5755
74492


Thick-side w/round receiver ring

142
325
762
2715
3290
474x
9866
9895
11315
11471
12302
12307
12311
14868
16385
16399
16459
17462
20348
20522
24503
24520
24522
307xx
30794
30798
49xxx
54302
63012
66230
74551
76359
76694
99956
111169
113120
113121
113122
114517
114922
131043 (Takedown)

Thin-side w/octagon receiver ring

273
526
551
557
913
1162
1204
1556
1588
1615
1716
1919
1927
1933
2104
2116
2122
2194
2229
2438
2482
2731
3274
92995

  

Real Men own and shoot a WINCHESTER Single Shot!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bert_H.
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 145
Location: Kingston
Joined: May 13th, 2004
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #11 - Jan 3rd, 2007 at 11:22pm
Print Post  
Hello Dave,

I agree... the serial number on the lower tang was factory restamped, and it was done sometime after 1910. Winchester made the switch from the italic style serial number to the block style precisely at serial number 110,000.

I also agree with you in that J.C. is not correct in his assertion that the numeral stamped on the barrel right next to the frame is the barrel size. The barrel size number is almost always stamped on the bottom of the barrel just forward of the forestock tip (some very early rifles were not marked), and the size number stamp is also frequently (approx. 50%) found under the forestock stamped between the flat-spring dovetail and the forestock tenon slot. It is my belief, that the number stamped next to the frame designates the shanks size (e.g. a "3" designates a .935" shank, and a "1" designates a .825" shank). I have not been able to conclusively proove it yet though. I am very interested in any information that you can get off of those old barrels.

I would also like to get all of the original participants in this topic string to post any comments or information that they may have.

Bert
  

Real Men own and shoot a WINCHESTER Single Shot!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bert_H.
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 145
Location: Kingston
Joined: May 13th, 2004
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #12 - Jan 3rd, 2007 at 11:29pm
Print Post  
ssdave wrote on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 11:05pm:
I did get the new rifle, I'll post info on it when it comes in.  It's in .40-70, rough shape, but thick side octagon.  Think the serial # is in the 1200's, its a little hard to read and I've only got photo's at this point.

And, got to looking and found another thick side round top in the safe.  It might be the same one as the 49xxx in your list, 49,117.  It came to me as an interesting basement project, ugliest .32-20, unfinished and new in the white homemade barrel you ever saw, musket stock, and looked to be a new in the white action never cycled or used before, but left to sit in a basement for 40 years till it turned an even brown outside.  Steve Durren made it into a nice .38-72 for my 10 year old son to shoot as a 1000 yard competition rifle, which he did quite successfully this year.

dave


The rifle in my records is a 50 Eley, 28" No. 3 round barrel, shotgun butt, and with British proof marks... I do not believe that it is yours (just another rifle in the same serial number range). As you can see by my list, the thick-side w/round receiver rings are spread throughout the entire production range.

Bert

p.s. Forgot to add... I own serial number 12302, which is a 50-95 W.C.F. If you would like to see pictures of it, go to this link - (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  

Real Men own and shoot a WINCHESTER Single Shot!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bert_H.
Full Member
***
Offline



Posts: 145
Location: Kingston
Joined: May 13th, 2004
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #13 - Jan 4th, 2007 at 2:10am
Print Post  
Hmmmm....  Undecided

The only other plausible theory would be that it is an inspection or assemblers stamp mark. I have a fair number of high-walls with a No. 3 barrel that have the "3" stamped next to the punch mark at the frame juncture.

Bert
  

Real Men own and shoot a WINCHESTER Single Shot!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
FITZ
Oldtimer
*****
Offline


REGARDS

Posts: 917
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
Joined: Apr 16th, 2004
Re: Win 1885 - Thick Side vs Octagon Top  acti
Reply #14 - Jan 6th, 2007 at 3:56pm
Print Post  
Bert, here is some more data for you.

#800 Thinside Hiwall with Octagon top and small Shank as a Lowall size. I bought it as a .222 Varmint and have built it into a heavy 30-30.

#818 Thickside, Octagon top, Large Shank  action straight grip. Have had it for awhile. Needs to be refinished.

#131043   "A" Tang. Thickside, Coil Spring Round Top action. Bought at Auction as  30-40 Krag. Was an obvious put together as the Barrel and forend showed lots of use, and the action was as new with I believe original factory blue. It is now a full Schuetzen with a #4 full Octagon Winchester barrel with the top three flats matted. All original Winchester 3X wood. The tang has been replaced with a fulll pistol grip couble set trigger tang.  HTH helps. Regards, FITZ.
  

FITZ
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
Send TopicPrint