Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Forearm Legality (Read 8286 times)
Brent
Ex Member


Forearm Legality
Aug 31st, 2006 at 10:27am
Print Post  
As I slowly build my Borchardt Schuetzen rifle, I have to decide on the shape and size of the forearm.  This will be a combination offhand and benchrest rifle with palm rest etc.  Last night a friend helped with shaping the tenon for the forearm and mentioned that there is a maximum length that is allowed by the rules.   

Any suggestions of what that length might be?

Any suggestions or better, photos of good candidates for forearm tip shapes?  I love a very slight schnable as found on some Ballards and the old Farmingdale Shiloh Sharps, but these are not always the best for shootting off bags (for some reason, a couple of my rifles shoot best when the forearm is on top of the bench rest).   

The forearm will NOT be a big fat flat bottom ugly block of wood.   

Thanks for any suggestions.  Maybe I should take a few pics of progress to date and post them for fun.

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sakoman
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 282
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Joined: Feb 20th, 2006
Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #1 - Aug 31st, 2006 at 11:33am
Print Post  
I think all of us lwould like to see pic's of your progress.

Are you building from a casting kit or from billit?

Regards,

Allen
  
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #2 - Aug 31st, 2006 at 11:38am
Print Post  
Allen, I'm building from an old sporterized and well beaten military Borchardt.  I took a couple of pictures but suddenly my FTP software has crapped out on me.  Can't upload.

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #3 - Aug 31st, 2006 at 12:47pm
Print Post  
Here we go...

The forearm tenon still needs final fitting.  Obviously the stock needs a lot of shaping and the receiver has a scan of a Zischang Borchardt from Seller's book glued to it.  I'm using that a template for filling off the shoulders and lower corners of the military action.  

The block of dark wood is desert ironwood that will be used for the nose piece and the panels.  It may also be used for the grip cap, but I think I'll go with steel there.

Off to the left is a palm rest that will be installed eventually.

It's a .38-55.  

Any help out there on forearm rules and regulations?

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Green_Frog
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline


"It ain't easy being green"
ASSRA Life #281

Posts: 4164
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Joined: Apr 18th, 2004
Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #4 - Aug 31st, 2006 at 1:23pm
Print Post  
Brent, IIRC there is no maximum length for a fore-end in the ASSRA rules, only for maximum width, which (again, IIRC) is 3" on a newly made rifle (exceptions for period pieces.)  It looks like you could take the rifle up to E-G this weekend and be legal as church on Sunday just like it is.
BTW, the grain in that butt stock is GAWJUSS!  I for one can't wait to see it finished.

Regards, Froggie
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
J.D.Steele
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #5 - Aug 31st, 2006 at 2:06pm
Print Post  
Hi Brent, nice-looking rifle!

You already have flare panels in the wood behind the action, so symmetry & aesthetics virtually demand something similar on the forearm, no? I assume that's what you had planned anyway.

The Borchardt frame is quite deep at the front, even the sporters. I suggest that you incorporate a third flare panel in the forearm wood on the bottom side; this will allow a pleasing transition from the deep wood at the action face, through the flare panel & into the shallower (we hope) rest of the forearm. I further suggest that you form some sort of divider between the side panels & the bottom panel, by cutting the two outside bottom corners of the metal at the front of the receiver in whatever fashion. My original design included a small quarter-round cutout at each of the two bottom front corners, and I made the dimension such that the line of the top of the cutout in the receiver could be carried straight out forward into the wood and become the bottom line of the forward portion of the forearm. This helps greatly in serving to 'slim down' the visual appearance of the blocky action & forearm without actually removing much metal or changing the actual strength factors at all.

For the forearm tip I think an elegant solution would be an ebony insert in a shallow schnabel, somewhat larger than the Win walls. I did an 1874 Sharps that way & it turned out quite well although I made it a little wider & deeper than the original. I also like an ebony insert in a round-tip forearm although it's very uncommon. Of course there's always the common ebony tip (full tip), but this IMO is just barely better than no ebony at all, & sometimes worse. Simply everyone has one, dontcha see (VBG).

I specified ebony 'cause I have some of it but you may be able to get some horn & that IMO might be even better.

I don't know what that piece of figured walnut is doing in the picture, so close the rest of the rifle & all. Might contaminate sumthin u know. I wuz lookin around for any white-line spacer material but u musta hid it under the table. I don't blame u. If you use anything but ebony or horn, then may the fleas of a thousand camels infest your armpits forever!
JMOFWIW, darn fine-lookin rifle, regards, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #6 - Aug 31st, 2006 at 2:53pm
Print Post  
Frog, thanks for the news on the regulations and the compliments as well.

The barrel is a Lilja 14 twist.  I think it will shoot a 317 gr Hoch tapered bullet quite well.  We shall see.   

It will also be tried with paper patch, but this might end up being my one grease groove gun.  Sort of disgraceful, but my other rifles have not yet thrown it out of the safe.   

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #7 - Aug 31st, 2006 at 3:03pm
Print Post  
Joe, 

Your ideas for panels on the forearm are great.  I don't think I can cut the metal quite like you suggest.  I don't have any machining ability beyond a drill press.  But I can do the panels to get the forearm slimmed down.  That is a very good plan.   

Your idea for a bottom panel has me thinking.  I have  a CPA made palm rest that will be attached down there somewhere.  I wonder if I could make a bottom panel/pedastal for it.  That would give me a bit more meat where the rest bolts on and maybe improve the looks a mite.   

I don't much like just the plain jane nose cap that modern rifles seem to have.  I have been contemplating a widows peak into some sort of gentle shnable, but not sure.  I could do the wedgie but they are SO Winchester.  I would like to avoid that.   

I think I rather like desert ironwood.  It polishes like ebony but doesn't look like plastic.  So, like it or not, that's what's going into the panels and the nose.   

The stock blank is fairly plain English walnut.  It is almost perfectly straight grain, but has a little contrast.  It is also very close to perfectly quarter-sawn as well.  It was cheap - in the $150 range or less, I forget.  I like my low wall wood much better.  But this will work. 

Currently, I have fantasies of sub-1 inch, 10-shot groups - at 200 yds.

Time will tell.

Brent
   

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
J.D.Steele
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #8 - Aug 31st, 2006 at 11:57pm
Print Post  
Brent, I usually do a lot of my cutting with a Foredom shaft-drive hand grinder; either that or a Dremel would be perfect for the job with a round-nose carbide burr or a small coarse stone, and then polish the resulting small concave trench with a Cratex wheel. Of course it's not absolutely necessary to cut the receiver's corners but it does make things easier when it comes to shaping and blending the three panels together, and it helps greatly in visually slimming the lines of the action. You could easily extend the bottom flare panel to include an attractive base for your folding palm rest, with a nice curve blending into the forward, slimmer portion of your forearm.

I spend a lot of pleasurable time and get a lot of great inspiration in studying pictures of S/S rifles made by Steven Dodd Hughes and Edd Webber. Some of these are shown in Steve Hughes' book Custom Rifles in Black and White. Some of these rifles are real eye candy, for instance Edd Webber's Hagn and his 1877 Sharps are IMO the finest examples of these two rifles that exist, at least to my knowledge. Maybe not the most ornate or the most expensive, but certainly the most beautiful to my eye. And Steve Hughes is just as good IMO. Wish I could do my own work to that level............

Yes, I too like the wood on your low wall a little better 'cause it has more figure. May I also suggest a nice checkering job for the Sharps? It's very gratifying to see how much beauty and interest a good checkering job can add to the looks of even the plainest wood. I emphasize the term 'good' in the previous sentence, and intend it to mean a GOOD SHARP job as opposed to necessarily a fancy or ornate or baroque or carved one.
Regards, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #9 - Sep 1st, 2006 at 9:24am
Print Post  
Joe,
I've been told that if I ever even allow my rifles in the same room as a dremel tool, they will probably never shoot straight again..

I'll file off the corners of the action to make it like a normal sporting action, but not much more than that.  I don't know what a Cratex wheel is either.  Though I'm sure I can find one.  I'll have to think about this but I see exactly what you are suggesting and it's a great idea for launching the panels out of the action.  I may have to give it a go.   

The Sharps will be checkered for sure.  I got the low wall checkered by Doug Mann and he will get this one eventually too.  Really does a fantastic job.  Have I ever posted you a picture since it's been finally case colored and checkered?  For the Borchardt, I'll have Ken scratch up some borders and corners on the Borchardt as well.   

I too enjoy SDH's books and have seen his stuff in a traveling show at the Minneapolis Museum of Art, but after having seen the guy interact on the internet, I enjoy them much much less than I used too.  My low wall was inspired by some of the things he had in his CRBW book.  BTW, that little wall shoots like no other rifle I own.  An amazing rifle.   

Say, does anyone want to venture an idea of how far out on the forearm I should attach the base of the palm rest?  I sure would like some best guess.  I've never used one before and have no rifles with a palm rest.

Brent


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
chrisj
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 91
Location: Iowa
Joined: Jan 11th, 2006
Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #10 - Sep 1st, 2006 at 1:59pm
Print Post  
"Say, does anyone want to venture an idea of how far out on the forearm I should attach the base of the palm rest?  I sure would like some best guess.  I've never used one before and have no rifles with a palm rest."


Brent:

Find the Center of gravity.  The controversy will begin there.  I think it comes down to personal preference.

For my rifle the palm rest is very close to right under the center of gravity, it works well for me.  Perhaps I'm just used to it.

Is there a way to test out various positions and see what you like?

Chris Jens
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #11 - Sep 1st, 2006 at 2:21pm
Print Post  
Chris, I don't know if you have ever seen my low wall with its lever-ball palmrest, but this puts the support point quite a bit behind the center of gravity.  I think this might be normal for heavy barreled schuetzen.  For sure, mine will be nose heavy due to its heavy barrel.  I suppose I could add weight to the butt, but the purpose of the hooked breech is to allow the nose drag to be caught by the lower prong of the hook under the shooter's arm.   

There is some adjustability in the rest, but not a lot.  I'll probably set it pretty far back - just wish I knew more about the details of these things.

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
boats
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 7728
Location: Virginia
Joined: Apr 23rd, 2004
Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #12 - Sep 1st, 2006 at 2:41pm
Print Post  
Brent,

I have half a dozen palm rest forearms around.  The Pope style swinging palm rest fixture can be run two ways. Post behind the swing axis and post in front of the swing axis. The hole for the rest goes all the way thoough so it can be mounted either way.

I shoot my Shuetzens equiped with that style in the rear positon which puts the center of the post 2 inches forward of my CPA recivers. On one of my rifles I shoot with the post about vertical and the other angled slightly toward the action for even closer support. They are buttstocked different and ballance different too. There are even small diffferences in set up when switching barrels center to rim fire. Mostly in the cant toward the reciever. Rimfire with a more powerfull scope I keep the knob real close to my body with cant in the adjustment.

On my modern palm rest rifles the rest slides in a rail so it can go anyware I want it to.  I end up with the palm rest on my old Anschutz 52 real close to the front of the reciever.  Further out on a 10M air rifle.  The 10 m gun has never felt right with the palm rest mostly because the buttplate does not have enough hook to counter the weight out front.

So you can see a lot of varabiles. I would strongly suggest making up a trial forearm to mount your rest.  The positon is dependent on your arm leingth, how you put you elbow on hip and the balance of the rifle itself. I don't know if you are going traditonal or if ASSA allows rails but a rail would not be a bad idea for set up while figureing out just what the best for you would be.  You could ditch it for a nice looking fixed arrangement later.

The Palm rest itself has a lot of possablities.  I started with the flat plate Anschutz style a long time ago and went to the Doorknob style when I set my first schuetzen up.   I also have one made from a drilled Billard ball for a fancy knob. It's too small !! light rifle perhaps but 14 # plus no way. 

Now I am using both a standard Scoyen from CPA and some home made varations of it. The standard Scoyen seems to be about the best.

Boats
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #13 - Sep 1st, 2006 at 2:58pm
Print Post  

Thanks Boats.  My rest is a CPA Schoyen style as well that will traditionally mounted (no rail).  Your suggestion about experimenting with a dummy forearm is a good one.  I might have to do a little of that.  I'm so damned in patient but this is to be the offhand rifle to end all offhand rifles.   

Might be the ultimate bench rifle as well.  But it may take a stock attachment to do that. The belly of the stock does not quite flatten out (front to back). So I have thought about a removable, bolt-on, bottom plate, but they may not be legal in all formats.  Sort of a wild hair idea that I thought of yesterday.  Someone must have already done this though.

Anyway, thanks for the comments, they help give me an idea of where to start.   

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Brent
Ex Member


Re: Forearm Legality
Reply #14 - Sep 2nd, 2006 at 4:11pm
Print Post  
Well, I made a cherry forearm that is pretty close in size to the eventual walnut forearm.  I mounted the palmrest pretth far back but I can see that the solution to my dilemma will be to mount it as far back as possible.

Now, to hope for a little break in the weather and I'll shoot it tomorrow.

Brent
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint