Barry,
Off topic? Nah! Well, maybe a little,
but that's what usually happens as one thing leads to another. For me anyway, topics are dynamic issues and one point usually brings up a coupla more in relation to it, which then leads further astray as the topic expands.
On points 1 & 2..... I wish I had two chronographs so I could have seen this point of yours. When working up the load for the .40 cal. 313 gr. bullet I figured the 1-16" twist would create an overstabilized bullet but what was confusing were the low SD/ES's at the muzzle, but not corresponding accuracy at 100 yds. With your comments here it could possibly be what was happening.
Points 3 & 4..... Does sound like what I've observed with the .32/40 especially.
Your point number 5..... I have heard arguments that this is not necessarily so. That the gyroscopic effect as the bullet spins going down range tends to keep the nose of the bullet pointed to the initial line of flight from the muzzle. Which I thought might be the cause of my .38 cal. bullets showing a slight amount of tipping at 200 yds.
Interesting that you think a 1-16" twist for the 320 gr. .38 cal. bullet would be better than a 1-15" or 1-14". In a discussion while shooting .22's indoors this morning I was thinking the same. Well, I guess we'll find out, as if my info is correct a 1-14" barrel is on the way if not here already.
Your observations on humidity affecting down range performance mirrors what I was thinking. My range is 950 ft. above sea level. I wonder why that is? You would think that the density of the air would play a major role in down range performance just due to more or less drag on the bullet. Possibly it does at further distances than we shoot at in Schuetzen. But why would you think humidity would have an affect on internal ballistics? Internal air column resistance on ignition?
PETE