Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Lubes and Lube Grooves (Read 21996 times)
ole7groove
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #15 - Nov 28th, 2005 at 2:07am
Print Post  
PETE

The efficiency factor (EF) is simply the percentage of retained MV at a given target range. For instance an EF of .804 is 80.4% of the MV (10ft from muzzle). An example an EF profile such as our #45 200grain flatnose bullet with a .115 metplat with MV of 1475fs is as follows: (Range EF times MV).
50yds  = .963 = 1420fs
75yds  = .932 = 1375fs
100yds = .895 = 1320fs
125yds = .873 = 1286fs
150yds = .845 = 1246fs
175yds = .822 = 1212fs
200yds = .799 = 1179fs
The EF's are constant for the 1350fs to 1550fs MV's that may be used for smokeless powder breech seated bullets. Each bullet has its own set of EF's for yardages in 25yd increments. By profiling each bullet design a more direct comparision can be made than by using the "standard Bullet" and "G1" drag function typically used. 

In addition to what I've mentioned before, extremely close velocity tolerance (+/- 5fs) were held for all test series, this also was an excellent way of detecting bullet instability or excessive yaw at downranges. With muzzle velocities held to +/- 5fs, a stable bullet will also yeild equally narrow downrange velocities, while bullets that are unstable will have erratic downrange velocities far in excess of the MV tolerance. While excessive yaw was not indicated with the 16" twist barrel, it was very apparent with a barrel with a 12" twist. Here the downrange velocities were within close tolerances, but retained velocity was about 5% less than when the same bullet was fired at the same velocity in the 16" twist barrel. This relationship of barrel twists will be explored next shooting season. SO MUCH TESTING-SO LITTLE TIME!!! Perhaps the oldtimers prefered 16" twist 32"s for 200 yard shooting for good reason? ??? Tongue

Atmospheric conditions such as humidity, barometric pressure, temperature and altitude have an effect on ballistics, since my ballistic test equipment is computer based accurate data entry of these parameters is required to obtain meaningful results. They do not seem to play as big a role at 200 yards as I once thought. At longer ranges such as those fired by the BP shooters they no doubt play a more tangable effect. Since my tests required certain specified test velocities, slight tweeking of the powder charge was needed due to temp. changes, sometimes as little as .08 grains. I have not crunched the atmospheric data from this past seasons testing yet, so i can not quantify the various variables. If you are testing at longer ranges than I am, I'm sure they may be more apparent to you.

Barry







« Last Edit: Nov 28th, 2005 at 2:52am by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1676
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #16 - Nov 28th, 2005 at 10:27am
Print Post  
Pete:  I think many people that watch humidity don't have a good understanding of what it means and what it does to air pressure.  When you watch the local weatherman, he is reporting the amount of water in the air compared to what it can hold "relative" to a given temperature, thus RH.  As the day warms up, the amount of water vapor in the air dosn't change much unless a front passes over you but the RH goes down because warmer air can hold more water vapor than cold air.  If you want, I can give examples in numbers but it will take a while.  Many people that write BP lube reports say that when the morning started the temps were such and the RH was such but that the air dried out as the day warmed up.  Actually, roughly the same amount of water vapor was in the air but now it looks like there is less because the RH has gone down.  To me, that's why BP fouling is so much a temperature issue.  When the air temps go up, the barrel temp goes up so much faster.  I can huff and puff on the blow tube but I think the fouling dries out just as fast as I'm adding moisture.
Another fallicy that many people have is that warm moist air is more dense than cold dry air when just the opposite is true.  If you take equal volumes of water vapor and air, air will weigh more.  I think the reason people develop this belief is when the temps are high and the amount of water vapor is high, it retards evaporation on your skin and you feel hot and sticky thus they think the air is heavier.  A good example is a hurricane.  Very high temps and high moisture levels yet this is when the lowest barometric pressures are recorded.  Your findings on temperature are right along with mine even though I shoot BP.  As the day progresses, sight settings go up not because of air pressure or humidity, but because the temperature of our loads has gone up so velocity increases.  I learned that the hard way at my first Q.  I got a sight setting early in the morning on the buffalo, but by the time I shot at the buff for score, the temp had risen about 20 degrees.  I shot over it 3 times in a row without seeing any dust kick up because it was happening behind the target.  Finally, somebody clued me in but it was a valuable lesson.  As you probably know, once the Q starts there are no sighters.  Its not as much of a problem in LR shooting because when we move to the different yardages, we get sighters before we shoot for score.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PETE
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #17 - Nov 28th, 2005 at 3:49pm
Print Post  
Barry,

  Thanks for the clarification on efficiency. I'm with you now.

  On excessive yaw and it's effect on downrange accuracy. I don't know if you have this problem with the .32/40 but every one in that caliber I've had always showed some tipping at 100 & 200 yds. I thought going to a lighter bullet SHOULD solve this problem, but it didn't. Your statement on this would suggest that lighter bullets than would be optimum for a given twist would cause more yaw. This seems to be the trouble when working up loads this past Fall for the .40/65. A nominal bullet (417 grs) for the twist worked up very easy, but going to a lighter bullet (313 grs) took quite a bit more work, and I was beginning to think I wouldn't make the accuracy level I wanted.

  Your comments on retained velocity loss with a quicker twist I'll certainly go along with. A bullet that yaws issubjecting more surface area to all forces that would retard it's flight and it's only reasonable that downrange velocity would be less than a bullet that was more stable. One of my pet peeves is people who say a little tipping is not detrimental to accuracy. As far as I'm concerned if you have to live with it, you do, but I want a stable bullet flight if at all possible and do all my load testing with that in mind.

  Yes.... A stable bullet will yield a stable downrange velocity spread, and that equates into better accuracy. Here's a question I think I know the answer to but would like your opinion to as I've about been told I don't know what I'm talking about. I have an original Win. High Wall in .38/55 with a 1-18" twist, and for bench shooting I use a 320 gr. Brooks bullet. At 100 & 200 yds. this bullet shoots fairly well, but shows a little tipping at 200. A gun I'm aware of in the same caliber, and cut with the same chambering reamer, shooting about the same wgt. bullet, but with a 1-15" twist, is lucky to shoot a 6" group at 200 yds. It is thought that a quicker twist is needed. I don't think so and with your statement on yaw and stability in twists I'm thinking a slower twist would be more useful. Your thoughts?

  Atmospheric conditions at short range. This is what I was trying to prove this past Summer. Forrest Asmus (FAsmus) uses Density Altitude  as a tool for setting sights when shooting out around the 800 to 100 yd. mark. I was curious if this would be a useful tool at Schuetzen ranges. This is gonna need a lot more work as the differences are small, if there at all. Wind, mirage, and personal sighting error are such that I'm not sure that any changes aren't being lost in other things. But, as I've mentioned to Forrest, it's pretty apparent that Temp. does have a noticeable affect on accuracy, and as far as Schuetzen shooting goes should be taken into account. If you ever do "crunch" the atmospheric conditions I hope you post them, as I think your testing eliminates the human error mine doesn't.

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PETE
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #18 - Nov 28th, 2005 at 4:18pm
Print Post  
Old-Win,

  I know about the humidity thing..... Now!  Grin It kind of bowled me over when FAsmus told me that humid air is less dense that dry air. Seemed to go against reasonable thinking. But, he's a pilot and they have to know these things so took his word for it until I did some checking.

  But my shooting this year shows there doesn't seem to be much correlation between humidity and accuracy. If the humidity stays constant doing a test and the Temp. changes it will show up on the chronograph and target. If the humidity changes and the Temp. stays the same there doesn't seem to be any difference I can tell at 100 yds. anyway. I think this would be about the same if carried out to further distances if Barry's last message above is any indication.

  Here's a question for you that I don't have straight in my mind yet. Can warm air hold more moisture than cold air? Or is it vice versa?

  I think the warm moist air vs cold dry air issue just comes from people thinking that if there is moisture in the air it just has to be denser since water weighs more than air.

  I thought the temp. affecting accuracy and sight settings would also apply to BP as well as smokeless, but hadn't done enuf testing to say for sure. I'm glad your testing agrees with that. Possibly it affects BP shooting more, or faster than smokeless due to differences in barrel Temp.'s created. But if you discounted that you still have air temp. and that would be the same for both.

  If I'm gonna do some Shilouette shooting next year I gotta get this blow tubing down in my mind a little bit better. You're saying that you can huff and puff but you think that the fouling dries out when you stop. I would think that BP fouling being so hygroscopic that if you subject it to moisture it would tend to hold onto it. Especially in our neck of the woods. I recall that by the time I walked out to the parking lot at the NCOWS Buffalo shoot and ran a patch thru the barrel the fouling came out as a soup rather than a solid. As the barrel was cooling down it apparently was sucking in moisture from the air. I didn't think it was particularly humid either. So, I'm kinda confused by your statment. Care to fill that out a bit more? In fact "Blow Tube 101" would be much appreciated.

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Old-Win
Frequent Elocutionist
*****
Offline



Posts: 1676
Location: Minnesota
Joined: Nov 24th, 2005
Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #19 - Nov 28th, 2005 at 6:48pm
Print Post  
Hi Pete:  Yes, warm air does hold more moisture than cold air.  I'll try to make up an example here to show what happens to RH as temperature changes.  Keep in mind that these figures are not real because I don't have a chart but they should explain what's going on.   
Suppose we have a cubic meter of air at 80 degrees and lets say that the maximum amount of water vapor it can hold would be 40 grams at that temperature.  Now, if that volume of air had only 20 grams of water in it then it would have 20/40 (half of what it could hold) or 50% RH.  Now, let's suppose that at 60 degrees, the air is saturated with 30 grams of water.  If you take that same volume of air that we started with and drop its temp to 60 degrees, you now have 20/30 or 66% RH just by dropping the temp without changing the actual amount of water vapor in the air.   
Here's another thing that deals with the density of air.  When water changes to a gas, a water molecule actually weighs less than molecules of air made up of nitrogen and oxygen but take up the same space.   
As far as blow tubing goes, we've started shoots when the temps have been in the low 40's or even lower.  I only use about one breath to keep the fouling soft when we begin.  It doesn't take much for your breath to condense on a cold barrel.  As I continue to shoot, I keep grabbing the barrel to see how it's heating up and adjust to its temp.  I will be up to about 4 breaths by the time its quite warm.  When it gets so hot that I can only hold on to it for a second or two, I am up to six.  This is when things get interesting and I start losing the race.  Every shoot is different and I'm just getting enough experience to handle it.  At the Quigley,  I never clean my barrel all day because we only shoot 8 shots at a time and that is not enough to get the barrel hot.  The LR shoots are a different story because the barrel continues to get hot and you have to average a shot roughly every 1 1/2 to 2 minutes so it doesn't have a chance to cool between shots.  Even though BP residue is hydroscopic, when the barrel is that hot, I think the moisture is evaporting out of it.  My trouble has come up when the temps where in the upper 80's and RH in the 30% range.  Now, What about them lube grooves?? Grin Roll Eyes  Bob
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
horsefly
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #20 - Nov 28th, 2005 at 7:51pm
Print Post  
Good morning, Board;

O.K., Pete, you're down on your knees asking for it.  Blow tube 101 will take a whole career to learn.  Needless to say, I'm still a student.  However, I'll start.

I think there are really two things going on in the bore from blow tubing.  The first is to convert the fat and fouling into soap.  Once that reaction takes place, it is not going to reverse.

The second thing is keeping the fouling and soap moist.  The hotter the day and/or barrel, the more moisture you need to put into the barrel to convert the soap and moisten the fouling.  If you wait too long before firing the next shot, you may need to blow again to soften the soap and fouling.  Knowing how long that is can be a real trick.  I don't much worry about it during a relay because you're shooting more than a round per minute.  The rub comes when you shoot five and have to wait to reset the targets.  Then you may want to blow again just before shooting.  It depends on your gun and load.  Experiment.

How much to blow?  I kind of have a standard three long slow breaths.  If the day is hot or especially dry, I'll add a breath ... maybe two.  If the day is especially humid, I may only blow one or two.  When you start to clean after the relay, blow the same way you blew when you were on the line.  If the patch slides through easily, you're doing it right.  You'll soon develop a feel.

Quite a few of us have those little combo thermometer / hygrometer thingies from Buffalo Arms.  The actual relative humidity will fool you if you just try to guess.

Now, how to blow.  You see a lot of folks on the line blowing hard enough to make their face turn red, their eyes bug out and their ears wiggle.  That's the wrong idea.  A long gentle breath is better.  It's more effective in delivering moisture to the fouling and it's easier on the shooter.  Remember, the idea is to deliver moisture.  If the air passes slowly down the bore, you get a much better transfer than if the air just goes zipping past everything on the way out.

I know a number of shooters who take a water bottle to the line and suck on it every shot to keep hydrated and think it helps keep their breath moist.  It surely doesn't hurt anything, but I think it's unnecessary.  If you get so dry your breath is not moist, you have bigger problems than running a blow tube!  Drinking plenty of water is good for you, but doesn't help in this one instance, ....

Now, it will be interesting to see how many people have a different take.

Y'all be good.

horsefly
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PETE
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #21 - Nov 28th, 2005 at 8:43pm
Print Post  
Old-Win,

  Your post on relative humidity was most interesting. Learned a lot I didn't know. Thanks!

  A question along this line, but totally irrelevant since you can buy instruments that give you the RH, but was the old method of using a wet and dry bulb just a different way of getting the same thing? I can remember my Dad making one of these up and as I recall there was a formula to use to get the answer. Always had it in my head this was a way of determining RH.

  Will have to keep your idea of grabbing the barrel to use as an indicator of blow tubing you need to do. What little I've read on the subject only differentiated between humid and dry conditions. As you know around here during "normal" shooting weather the humidity is above 50%, except on rare occasions. With my experience at the NCOWS match I didn't think of barrel temp. as being a consideration.

  About them lube grooves. Grin Well, actually if you get down to it the last few messages are all about lube grooves and associated problems. You have to have enuf lube to make blow tubing practical. To little and no matter how much blowing you do it isnt gonna be enuf. To much and I personally feel that accuracy will suffer. As I pointed out, different bullets, different loads, and different guns require different amounts of lube..... and you might have to throw in different temp.'s and humidity. There probably is no one answer to the lube question and about all you can do is try to get something that will work for all conditions, knowing it's probably not gonna be best for any.

  You BP shooters might not be familiar with Claude Roderick, but the older Schuetzen shooters on here will be. He was considered one of the founders of modern Schuetzen shooting. I corresponded with him a year or so before he passed away. His thinking on lube was that you needed different tempers for different temp.'s, and sent me a whole page of variations that covered the range of temp.'s we shoot at. Of course this was for smokeless, but as we're finding out in these discussions it would also apply to BP. So, instead of only looking at various lubes and numbers of grooves, you can also look at various tempers in your lube. Feather is looking at harder lubes, but the question would be is if there is such a thing as a lube that will give best results in all temp.'s? Steve Garbe was questioned a while back on whether a variation on SPG would be of benefit over certain temp. ranges. His results showed that there was a slight difference between pan and machine lubing but basically the "old" formula worked the best.

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PETE
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #22 - Nov 28th, 2005 at 8:56pm
Print Post  
horsefly,

  Well, I've got my kneepads on so am ready for anything!  Grin

  Enjoyed your post and learned a few things. I like the idea of "soap" being formed when you blow tube, but not sure I get where this idea comes from. As far as I know none of the new or old soaps are/were made entirely of ingredients found in BP. The closest I can imagine would be the old Lye soap, and I'm not sure I would want to leave any residue like that in my barrel for the length of a match as I've read some seem to do. Which brings up a question.... Aren't you guys afraid of your bores starting to rust if the humidity is high enuf it'll turn the fouling to "soup" if let stand for a short while?

  On using the patch to see if you are blow tubing the right amount. I've been keeping track of this and find that over 50% humidity a dry patch will push easily thru a bore after three long, slow breaths. When the temp. gets down into the 40's and the humidity is around 30%, using three breaths doesn't seem to cut it as you pretty well have to pound on the rod to get the dry patch thru. Even wetting it doesn't improve things to much. would you think more breaths would be needed, or?

  Can I get off my knees now? They're starting to ache!  Grin

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
horsefly
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #23 - Nov 29th, 2005 at 8:57am
Print Post  
Good morning, Pete;

You said, "Can I get off my knees now? They're starting to ache!"  Well.....

A soap is produced in the reaction between a fat and an alkali.  Grandma's lye soap is one good example.  The harshness of the soap is mostly due to an excess of the lye because you really don't want extra fat in your soap.

So far as the soap hurting the bore in the period of one day, I have never heard of any problem.  After all, the fouling is already in the bore and the soap film is between the fouling and the metal.

You have noticed that the patch is hard to push through with three breaths in cold dry weather.  I think this is a good example of the idea that you need more blowing in cold dry weather - both on the line and before cleaning.

Y'all be good.

horsefly
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PETE
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #24 - Nov 29th, 2005 at 1:19pm
Print Post  
Horsefly,

  Yes... I'm aware that lye, and other old time chemicals were used in the making of soap. But I don't see the connection between soap and BP residue. All you've got is a little carbon, sulphur, and potassium(?) mixed together. Mostly carbon I would imagine. There are some soaps used in making some home made lubes, primarily as an agent to saponify it. Maybe some have fat in them, but I don't think the majority have. Might be wrong, so....

  What I was wanting to know is where do you get the lube and BP mixing together to form a "soap"? You're making a leap here I don't see, unless you know the formula's for all the commercial BP lubes out there and how they perform this "soap" making operation.

  BP fouling by itself is hygroscopic and would seem to me to not need any "soap" to soften it.

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
horsefly
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #25 - Nov 29th, 2005 at 4:23pm
Print Post  
Good morning, Pete;

Sorry I didn't make the connection complete.  Most of the fouling left by BP is fly ash - an alkaline (basic or hydroxide) product.  If you leave fouling on a cleaning patch for several hours, it turns white.  It is not carbon.

Lye for soap is leached with water from ashes from the fireplace or stove.

Interestingly enough, when the fouling (fly ash) is fresh it is easily wettable and easily cleaned.  If you wait until it turns white, it becomes much harder and sticks to the bore much more and is harder to clean.

Y'all be good.

horsefly
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
PETE
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #26 - Nov 29th, 2005 at 6:13pm
Print Post  
Horsefly,

  Thanks for your explanation. I've noticed this white residue on dry patches, but guess I'm never gonna get the relation to "white" not being carbon, or at least in great part. All you have to do is look at the burned out charcoal in your BBQ t osee that it's white. Wish Bill Knight was on here! Since the carbon makes up a great proportion of the BP it should also be a large part of the residue.

  I can see the fouling as being alkaline, but not being a chemist I don't see some of the things your putting forth as having anything to do with "soap".

PETE
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
horsefly
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #27 - Nov 29th, 2005 at 7:56pm
Print Post  
Good morning, Pete;

Let me take another whack at it.  We agree, I think, that soap is the product of a reaction between an alkali and fat.  The fat is the layer of lube laid down on the bore.  The alkali is the BP residue laid down in the bore.  When you blow moisture down the bore, the alkali and fat are wetted and a chemical reaction takes place to form a crude soap.  Now you have a layer of soap between the remaining fouling and the bore.

You also said, "Since the carbon makes up a great proportion of the BP it should also be a large part of the residue."  You are right, it is.  But the burning reaction changes the carbon and the potassium nitrate into something else - the alkaline ash.

This chemical reaction stuff can be confusing if you are looking for the reactants to resemble what they were before the reaction.  For instance, if you react hydrochloric acid (strong acid) with sodium hydroxide (a strong base) you get salt and water.  You can drink it if you got the proportions right.  If you burn gasoline in the presence of oxygen, you get carbon dioxide and water.  Neither one of them resemble gasoline.

So, the point is, the carbon is there, but it is not going to act like you think elemental carbon should act.  It is in something new and different.

Y'all be good.

horsefly
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ole7groove
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #28 - Nov 29th, 2005 at 8:58pm
Print Post  
PETE, Old-Win, feather, horsefly

First of few comments about my take on lube grooves and lubes. Not being a BP shooter my comments may or may not apply to BP.

As a bullet mould maker, the shape of lube grooves has nothing to due with with the cherrie cutting tool life or the amount of time required to cut the cavity, whether the grooves are round bottom and shallow or deep square groove. When I first made moulds almost 40 years ago, it soon became quite evident that shallow round bottom grease groove bullets released bullets more easily than square deep groove bullets from the mould. Remember that the alloy shrinks slightly in the mould cavity causing the bullet to grip the cavity. Even now when we make deep grease groove flat bottom bullet cherries they will have about a 3-5 degree side angle to allow the bullets to drop from the mould readily.

Grease groove depth and width, typically bullets of my design will have a GG depth of 5% bullet diameter (.016 deep for 32 caliber and width of .050 wide) rounded bottom. Bullets having only 2 GG's of this size and driving bands .120 wide provided enough lube and preformed as well as bullets having 5 GG's.

I beleive its important that excess lube be spun out of the GG's as the bullet exits the muzzle. The blackened (leaded edge) seen on the target is powder/bullet residue that is too minute to be spun off. We have all noticed that the first shot from a clean barrel does not display this residue edge, but a much lighter colored grey colored leaded edge. I have not seen any advantage to deeper or wider grease grooves.

With smokeless powders the bullet traveling down the barrel is lubricated more by the lube residue from the previous shot than the lube being carried in the grease grooves. Since the bullet seals the bore, the amount of residue left in the bore is the same regardless of GG size. To my way of thinking the residue left in the bore, is forced between the bullet and the steel of the barrel, much like the hydraulic wedge created in a journal bearing. I agree with you Pete that the rortaional force of lube against the bore while in the barrel plays a part in lubrication.

Any good bullet lube will have a high enough shear strength to hold up during the extreme pressures at the interface of the bullet and barrel surfaces. The consistancy of the bore residue changes with changes to temperature and humidity, this can vary with with lube formulas. As a schuetzen shooter, I breech seat the next bullet after firing as soon as possible to prevent fouling in the throat from hardening and also seal off air flow that might occur through the bore.

Powder fouling in the throat that is allowed to build up and harden will cause erratic muzzle velocities. Most schuetzen shooters are familiar with the black caking that can build up on the case neck if not cleaned off regularly. If allowed to build up this caking on the case is most difficult to clean off, this same condition occurs in the throat and at times in the bore at a point where the pressure peak of the powder occurs.This fouling build up is choking bore and works like a sizing die and will change the diameter of the bullet beyond the area of the fouling.

Thats my take on it  Roll Eyes
Barry

« Last Edit: Nov 29th, 2005 at 9:10pm by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ole7groove
Ex Member


Re: Lubes and Lube Grooves
Reply #29 - Nov 29th, 2005 at 10:22pm
Print Post  
PETE,

We are getting off subject on this thread I think.

Here are some of my thoughts regarding stability and yaw, right now they are just speculation on my part based on my obsevations doing two years of testing breechseated bullets.

Previously, I mentioned that when comparing the same bullets shot from a 16" twist barrel to them same fired from a 12" the downrange (200yd) EF was about 5% less with 12" twist. While this is true, groups shot with particular barrel shoots groups regularly under minute of angle (200yds). The 16" twist barrel also shoots sub-minute of angle groups with the appropriate velocity. I suspect that there are several conditions the occur during the bullets flight.
1. Random instability - a condition that causing extreme downrange velocity spreads.
2. Random yaw - the effect of this condition are the same as for #1
3. Repeating instability - this condition results in similar velocity spreads downrange as muzzle velocity spreads. This may explain why slight tipping is seen even on very small groups.
4. Repeating yaw - again this condition results are similar to #3
5. Stabilized and tangent yaw - perfection. The bullet spins about its axis and the nose of the bullet is tangent to the trajectory arc.
Next shooting season I plan to explore these conditions in more detail, using 16", 14" and 12" twist barrels.

With respect to your 38-55 x 18" twist barrel, when I was making barrels I also found that a twist faster than 16" in 38 caliber did not perform well at 100 or 200 yards. With the 18" twist, as I recall, a 300 grain bullet was performed best accuracy-wise. I beleive the faster the twist the more any inbalances in the bullet are amplified, which may be the result of your friends 15" twist. I made up a 40caliber barrel chambered for .405 with a 18" twist and have found that is capable of excellent accuracy at 200yds with a 375 grain bullet 1.350 long. A 415grain bullet showed slight tipping at 200yds, although accuracy was good, the recoil was not pleasant, recoil was more than 13 ft lbs. at 1525fs. Too much for this old fart, 50 shots a day is about all I want to tolerate.

Going back to this past seasons testing data, I checked the velocity difference between 60F and 82F of same bullet fired at the same MV = 12fs. This is the average of 30 shots each at 1500fs. The effect of humidity of downrange ballistics in nil., I beleive its effect we see has more to do with the internal ballistics. The altitude of my test range is 1640 feet above sea level, I have observed atltimeter readings from 1470 to 1750 during the course of testing, this has a small effect on velocity and follows barometric pressure.

Barry
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Send TopicPrint