Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Side Lever Ruger Action (Read 34907 times)
wesg
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 322
Joined: Sep 13th, 2004
Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #45 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 4:59am
Print Post  
Interesting point Joe brought up about thread wear. Got me thinking and doing a little math. Assuming .001 wear, a square thread responds in a ratio depending on the thread pitch. A 60° V thread responds in a 1/.866 ratio, which results in a 20% increase in linear movement to take up the slack.

Without typing all the math, a 16 TPI square thread would need 5.76° of rotation to take up .001 wear, while a 16 TPI V thread would require 6.912° of rotation.

However, the square threads I've seen on barrels are typically a 10 TPI thread, and the same .001 wear would result in 3.6° of rotation (4.32° for a 10 TPI V thread).

That's a 20% increase for the V thread over a square thread, but a 60% increase for the 16 TPI thread over the 10 TPI. It's not so much the V thread that causes the apparent wear as the finer pitch they use.

As for a takedown on a Ruger, the easy way out is to use the original main spring and hammer strut.  Doesn't require anything more than a pin to remove once the hammer is cocked. Doing it with a flat spring requires, most likely, a screwdriver (which you already needed to remove the forearm anyway), or you could possibly swing it aside if the hammer had a tail extending forward of the receiver face. An internal torsion spring might be a challenge.

The hanger came off mine sunday. I left 1/4" for the extractor pin. I'm planning on replacing it with a lug attached to the barrel, which will anchor the original main spring system for now. I haven't decided whether I'll try to implement the ejector spring or not.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JDSteele
Ex Member


Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #46 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 12:09pm
Print Post  
I've seen the locking nut arrangement done on an 1898 Mauser with the internal shoulder and it worked well. Should also work well on a single shot, if done correctly. Don't know how it would look/work with an octagon bbl, however, when things finally began to get loose. Scope mounting would take some thought.
Interesting, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JDSteele
Ex Member


Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #47 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 12:16pm
Print Post  
Wesg, a question. When you calculated the takeup with the different thread systems, did you apply the vee-thread formula to both parts of the thread? 'Cause I think both sides (bbl & frame) would be subject to the same reaction since they're both slanted 60 degrees.
Just a thought, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wesg
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 322
Joined: Sep 13th, 2004
Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #48 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 4:10pm
Print Post  
Joe,

I just assumed one face was fixed and the other had all the wear. I think the math works out the same as half on each. So the .001 gap is aligned at the 60°, or 30° from the bore line. That makes a 30-60-90 triangle with the hypotenuse in line with the bore.

I'd have to get out the book and make some calculations, but I don't think there's a huge difference in face area between the 16TPI V and the 10TPI square. The square is .050 deep, and the V is .062 minus the root fillet and tip flat.

Another thought, the Ruger has a 1" thread. May be reasonable to bore it out and cut a 1.100 x 10TPI square thread in it. I don't know if I'd want to do it with a belted mag, but for anything a typical single shot nut would want I think it'd work fine.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Tentman
Ex Member


Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #49 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 4:42pm
Print Post  
Hello Folks

Lots of good thinking going on here, its wonderful.

Wesg - how are you planning to attach the mainspring anchor to the barrel - I'm thinking a dovetail slot same as a sight mount, or will you solder/weld something on ??

Interesting point about the wear, the reason I was thinking about the locking nut was to remove the "slack" without rotating the barrel (and sights and fittings . . . ) and I thought headspace might be compensated by adjusting the reloading dies.  If the wear is minimal as per Wes's estimate then headspace won't be signifgantly affected.

Cheers - Foster
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JDSteele
Ex Member


Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #50 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 6:39pm
Print Post  
Wesg, you might also consider a 12tpi square thread as used in the Marlins, it would give you a little more room and minimize the 'crush' wear effect at the same time. I'll bet you could use something like 1.050" x 12 tpi instead of 1.100" and still have plenty of wall thickness left. But I bet you hafta use a carbide tool to cut that Ruger receiver ring!
Regards, Joe
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
wesg
Senior Forum Member
****
Offline



Posts: 322
Joined: Sep 13th, 2004
Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #51 - Oct 28th, 2005 at 7:10pm
Print Post  
Joe,

The finer pitch sounds like a good idea. I'll go with the V thread on mine, and just open it up whatever it takes to straighten it out. I haven't laid a cutting tool on it yet. Just ground the sides flat for reference, and cut the hanger on the wire EDM so I had a narrow gap in case I decided to weld it back on at some point. Am I in for a surprise? The Ruger bolt action I did wasn't any problem to rework.

Foster,

I'm thinking of an oval block held on with a couple screws. Probably set it in a shallow pocket to take the shear load off the screws. Depending on how that looks I may go with a dovetail instead.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Tentman
Ex Member


Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #52 - Oct 29th, 2005 at 6:02pm
Print Post  
Hello Folks

After a bit of late night scheming I think there is a way of doing the ignition faster and with nothing in front.

The Rugers hammer is replaced and becomes a sort of light-weight link, it is uses the existing sear but the firing impulse is delivered to the transfer bar via a strut or striker that connects at the sear end of the link, somewhat like the Hagn action.  The striker pivots from under the stock bolt along the line of the saftey bar, which it replaces.  The safety would be a "preventer" that stops the striker from pivoting up.

This would deliver a striking action based on impluse like a modern bolt action(sorry I'm not a smith or engineer so don't know the right jargon) rather that the effect of a hammer, which I think of as based on momentum.

There is a little milling to be done to the reciever web that lies just to the front of the sear and a seat for the base of the striker but if it is no good then it should be possible to go back to the original parts (as long as the hanger bar hasn't yet been "chopped")

Now all someone has to do is figure how to have the lever have a positive position at all times, instead of being "floppy" when not being pushed on by the mainspring.

Cheers - Foster
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Tentman
Ex Member


Re: Side Lever Ruger Action
Reply #53 - Nov 3rd, 2005 at 3:45pm
Print Post  
Hello

I have just been reading the De Haas "Gunsmithing Ideas" book and found a gem of an idea that had not previously registered on me.

He is suggesting that a hanger be attached to the underside of the barrel via screws into the reinforce of the barrel.  On the Ruger this would enable a switch barrel/takedown to be adopted, whilst retaining the current mainspring arrangement, albeit with a little modification.  He allows in the book that  this was his preferred forend attachment method.

Has anyone tried it or know of other folk who have  - results??

Cheers - Foster
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Send TopicPrint